GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Mobile vs GTX 670MX SLI

Place in the ranking	447	269
Place by popularity	not in top-100	69
Power efficiency	4.67	28.19
Architecture	Kepler (2012−2018)	Turing (2018−2022)
GPU code name	N13E-GR	TU116
Market segment	Laptop	Laptop
Release date	1 October 2012 (12 years ago)	23 April 2020 (4 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	1920	1024
Core clock speed	600 MHz	1350 MHz
Boost clock speed	no data	1485 MHz
Number of transistors	5080 Million	6,600 million
Manufacturing process technology	28 nm	12 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	150 Watt	50 Watt
Texture fill rate	no data	95.04
Floating-point processing power	no data	3.041 TFLOPS
ROPs	no data	32
TMUs	no data	64

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop size	large	medium sized
Interface	no data	PCIe 3.0 x16
SLI options	+	-

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	GDDR5	GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount	no data	4 GB
Memory bus width	2x 192 Bit	128 Bit
Memory clock speed	2800 MHz	1500 MHz
Memory bandwidth	no data	192.0 GB/s
Shared memory	-	-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors

no data

No outputs

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Optimus

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	11	12 (12_1)
Shader Model	no data	6.5
OpenGL	no data	4.6
OpenCL	no data	1.2
Vulkan	-	1.2.140
CUDA	+	7.5

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

GTX 670MX SLI 10.05

GTX 1650 Ti Mobile 20.21
+101%

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

GTX 670MX SLI 7042

GTX 1650 Ti Mobile 13266
+88.4%

3DMark Vantage Performance

3DMark Vantage is an outdated DirectX 10 benchmark using 1280x1024 screen resolution. It taxes the graphics card with two scenes, one depicting a girl escaping some militarized base located within a sea cave, the other displaying a space fleet attack on a defenseless planet. It was discontinued in April 2017, and Time Spy benchmark is now recommended to be used instead.

GTX 670MX SLI 23526

GTX 1650 Ti Mobile 43517
+85%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD	71 +22.4%	58 −22.4%
1440p	18−21 −133%	42 +133%
4K	12−14 −125%	27 +125%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077

14−16

−293%

59
+293%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	24−27 −154%	61 +154%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	14−16 −227%	49 +227%
Battlefield 5	30−35 −113%	65−70 +113%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	20−22 −165%	53 +165%
Cyberpunk 2077	14−16 −207%	46 +207%
Far Cry 5	21−24 −200%	69 +200%
Far Cry New Dawn	27−30 −200%	84 +200%
Forza Horizon 4	65−70 −87.9%	120−130 +87.9%
Hitman 3	18−20 −168%	51 +168%
Horizon Zero Dawn	50−55 −235%	181 +235%
Metro Exodus	30−35 −194%	91 +194%
Red Dead Redemption 2	27−30 −63%	44 +63%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	30−35 −109%	65−70 +109%
Watch Dogs: Legion	60−65 −219%	201 +219%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	24−27 −87.5%	45−50 +87.5%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	14−16 −113%	32 +113%
Battlefield 5	30−35 −113%	65−70 +113%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	20−22 −135%	47 +135%
Cyberpunk 2077	14−16 −140%	36 +140%
Far Cry 5	21−24 −152%	58 +152%
Far Cry New Dawn	27−30 −111%	59 +111%
Forza Horizon 4	65−70 −87.9%	120−130 +87.9%
Hitman 3	18−20 −163%	50 +163%
Horizon Zero Dawn	50−55 −233%	180 +233%
Metro Exodus	30−35 −155%	79 +155%
Red Dead Redemption 2	27−30 −44.4%	39 +44.4%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	30−35 −134%	75 +134%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	24−27 −73.1%	45−50 +73.1%
Watch Dogs: Legion	60−65 −190%	183 +190%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	24−27 −12.5%	27 +12.5%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	14−16 +0%	15 +0%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	20−22 −55%	31 +55%
Cyberpunk 2077	14−16 −127%	34 +127%
Far Cry 5	21−24 −69.6%	39 +69.6%
Forza Horizon 4	65−70 −87.9%	120−130 +87.9%
Hitman 3	18−20 −126%	43 +126%
Horizon Zero Dawn	50−55 −18.5%	64 +18.5%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	30−35 −96.9%	63 +96.9%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	24−27 −50%	39 +50%
Watch Dogs: Legion	60−65 +186%	22 −186%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

27−30

−51.9%

41
+51.9%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5	18−20 −105%	35−40 +105%
Far Cry New Dawn	14−16 −153%	38 +153%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	10−11 −110%	21−24 +110%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	6−7 −200%	18−20 +200%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	10−11 −120%	21−24 +120%
Cyberpunk 2077	5−6 −220%	16 +220%
Far Cry 5	10−12 −136%	26 +136%
Forza Horizon 4	40−45 −157%	110−120 +157%
Hitman 3	12−14 −115%	28 +115%
Horizon Zero Dawn	20−22 −105%	40−45 +105%
Metro Exodus	14−16 −171%	35−40 +171%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	12−14 −215%	40−45 +215%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	9−10 −156%	21−24 +156%
Watch Dogs: Legion	60−65 −93.5%	120 +93.5%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

16−18

−106%

30−35
+106%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5	9−10 −122%	20−22 +122%
Far Cry New Dawn	7−8 −186%	20 +186%
Hitman 3	6−7 −167%	16 +167%
Horizon Zero Dawn	40−45 +0%	42 +0%
Metro Exodus	8−9 −175%	21−24 +175%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	7−8 −257%	25 +257%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	6−7 −100%	12−14 +100%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	4−5 −150%	10−11 +150%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	5−6 −120%	10−12 +120%
Cyberpunk 2077	1−2 −500%	6 +500%
Far Cry 5	5−6 −140%	12 +140%
Forza Horizon 4	12−14 −133%	27−30 +133%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	6−7 −283%	21−24 +283%
Watch Dogs: Legion	4−5 −125%	9−10 +125%

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

9−10

−100%

18−20
+100%

This is how GTX 670MX SLI and GTX 1650 Ti Mobile compete in popular games:

GTX 670MX SLI is 22% faster in 1080p
GTX 1650 Ti Mobile is 133% faster in 1440p
GTX 1650 Ti Mobile is 125% faster in 4K

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

in Watch Dogs: Legion, with 1080p resolution and the Ultra Preset, the GTX 670MX SLI is 186% faster.
in Cyberpunk 2077, with 4K resolution and the Ultra Preset, the GTX 1650 Ti Mobile is 500% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

GTX 670MX SLI is ahead in 1 test (1%)
GTX 1650 Ti Mobile is ahead in 69 tests (96%)
there's a draw in 2 tests (3%)

Pros & cons summary

Performance score	10.05	20.21
Recency	1 October 2012	23 April 2020
Chip lithography	28 nm	12 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	150 Watt	50 Watt

GTX 1650 Ti Mobile has a 101.1% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 7 years, a 133.3% more advanced lithography process, and 200% lower power consumption.

The GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Mobile is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce GTX 670MX SLI in performance tests.

Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.