Radeon HD 7570 vs GeForce GTX 670MX SLI

VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared GeForce GTX 670MX SLI with Radeon HD 7570, including specs and performance data.

GTX 670MX SLI
2012
150 Watt
9.96
+530%

GTX 670MX SLI outperforms HD 7570 by a whopping 530% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking453964
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency4.551.80
ArchitectureKepler (2012−2018)TeraScale 2 (2009−2015)
GPU code nameN13E-GRTurks
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date1 October 2012 (12 years ago)5 January 2012 (12 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores1920480
Core clock speed600 MHz650 MHz
Number of transistors5080 Million716 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm40 nm
Power consumption (TDP)150 Watt60 Watt
Texture fill rateno data15.60
Floating-point processing powerno data0.624 TFLOPS
ROPsno data8
TMUsno data24

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizelargeno data
Interfaceno dataPCIe 2.0 x16
Widthno data1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone
SLI options+-

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5DDR3, GDDR5
Maximum RAM amountno data2 GB
Memory bus width2x 192 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed2800 MHz800 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data64 GB/s
Shared memory-no data

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectorsno data1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGA
HDMI-+

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Optimus+-

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX1111.2 (11_0)
Shader Modelno data5.0
OpenGLno data4.4
OpenCLno data1.2
Vulkan-N/A
CUDA+-

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD66
+560%
10−12
−560%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 14−16
+650%
2−3
−650%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 24−27
+700%
3−4
−700%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 14−16
+650%
2−3
−650%
Battlefield 5 30−35
+675%
4−5
−675%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 20−22
+567%
3−4
−567%
Cyberpunk 2077 14−16
+650%
2−3
−650%
Far Cry 5 21−24
+667%
3−4
−667%
Far Cry New Dawn 27−30
+600%
4−5
−600%
Forza Horizon 4 65−70
+560%
10−11
−560%
Hitman 3 18−20
+533%
3−4
−533%
Horizon Zero Dawn 50−55
+575%
8−9
−575%
Metro Exodus 30−35
+675%
4−5
−675%
Red Dead Redemption 2 27−30
+575%
4−5
−575%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 30−35
+540%
5−6
−540%
Watch Dogs: Legion 60−65
+600%
9−10
−600%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 24−27
+700%
3−4
−700%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 14−16
+650%
2−3
−650%
Battlefield 5 30−35
+675%
4−5
−675%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 20−22
+567%
3−4
−567%
Cyberpunk 2077 14−16
+650%
2−3
−650%
Far Cry 5 21−24
+667%
3−4
−667%
Far Cry New Dawn 27−30
+600%
4−5
−600%
Forza Horizon 4 65−70
+560%
10−11
−560%
Hitman 3 18−20
+533%
3−4
−533%
Horizon Zero Dawn 50−55
+575%
8−9
−575%
Metro Exodus 30−35
+675%
4−5
−675%
Red Dead Redemption 2 27−30
+575%
4−5
−575%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 30−35
+540%
5−6
−540%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 24−27
+550%
4−5
−550%
Watch Dogs: Legion 60−65
+600%
9−10
−600%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 24−27
+700%
3−4
−700%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 14−16
+650%
2−3
−650%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 20−22
+567%
3−4
−567%
Cyberpunk 2077 14−16
+650%
2−3
−650%
Far Cry 5 21−24
+667%
3−4
−667%
Forza Horizon 4 65−70
+560%
10−11
−560%
Hitman 3 18−20
+533%
3−4
−533%
Horizon Zero Dawn 50−55
+575%
8−9
−575%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 30−35
+540%
5−6
−540%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 24−27
+550%
4−5
−550%
Watch Dogs: Legion 60−65
+600%
9−10
−600%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 27−30
+575%
4−5
−575%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5 18−20
+533%
3−4
−533%
Far Cry New Dawn 14−16
+650%
2−3
−650%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 10−11
+900%
1−2
−900%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 6−7 0−1
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 10−11
+900%
1−2
−900%
Cyberpunk 2077 5−6 0−1
Far Cry 5 10−12
+1000%
1−2
−1000%
Forza Horizon 4 40−45
+633%
6−7
−633%
Hitman 3 12−14
+550%
2−3
−550%
Horizon Zero Dawn 20−22
+567%
3−4
−567%
Metro Exodus 14−16
+600%
2−3
−600%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 12−14
+550%
2−3
−550%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 9−10
+800%
1−2
−800%
Watch Dogs: Legion 60−65
+589%
9−10
−589%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 16−18
+700%
2−3
−700%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5 9−10
+800%
1−2
−800%
Far Cry New Dawn 7−8
+600%
1−2
−600%
Hitman 3 6−7 0−1
Horizon Zero Dawn 40−45
+600%
6−7
−600%
Metro Exodus 8−9
+700%
1−2
−700%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 7−8
+600%
1−2
−600%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 6−7 0−1
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 4−5 0−1
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 5−6 0−1
Cyberpunk 2077 1−2 0−1
Far Cry 5 5−6 0−1
Forza Horizon 4 12−14
+1100%
1−2
−1100%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 6−7 0−1
Watch Dogs: Legion 4−5 0−1

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 9−10
+800%
1−2
−800%

This is how GTX 670MX SLI and HD 7570 compete in popular games:

  • GTX 670MX SLI is 560% faster in 1080p

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 9.96 1.58
Recency 1 October 2012 5 January 2012
Chip lithography 28 nm 40 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 150 Watt 60 Watt

GTX 670MX SLI has a 530.4% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 8 months, and a 42.9% more advanced lithography process.

HD 7570, on the other hand, has 150% lower power consumption.

The GeForce GTX 670MX SLI is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon HD 7570 in performance tests.

Be aware that GeForce GTX 670MX SLI is a notebook card while Radeon HD 7570 is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce GTX 670MX SLI
GeForce GTX 670MX SLI
AMD Radeon HD 7570
Radeon HD 7570

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.7 3 votes

Rate GeForce GTX 670MX SLI on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.5 364 votes

Rate Radeon HD 7570 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.