ATI Radeon 9200 SE vs GeForce GTX 1660 Ti

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking	166	1540
Place by popularity	31	not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation	39.05	no data
Power efficiency	19.01	no data
Architecture	Turing (2018−2022)	Rage 7 (2001−2006)
GPU code name	TU116	RV280
Market segment	Desktop	Desktop
Release date	22 February 2019 (6 years ago)	1 March 2003 (22 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)	$279	no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the performance-to-price ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices for comparison.

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	1536	no data
Core clock speed	1500 MHz	200 MHz
Boost clock speed	1770 MHz	no data
Number of transistors	6,600 million	36 million
Manufacturing process technology	12 nm	150 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	120 Watt	28 Watt
Texture fill rate	169.9	0.8
Floating-point processing power	5.437 TFLOPS	no data
ROPs	48	4
TMUs	96	4

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Interface	PCIe 3.0 x16	AGP 8x
Length	229 mm	no data
Width	2-slot	1-slot
Supplementary power connectors	1x 8-pin	None

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	GDDR6	DDR
Maximum RAM amount	6 GB	64 MB
Memory bus width	192 Bit	64 Bit
Memory clock speed	1500 MHz	166 MHz
Memory bandwidth	288.0 GB/s	2.656 GB/s
Shared memory	-	no data

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors	1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort	1x DVI, 1x VGA, 1x S-Video
HDMI	+	-

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	12 (12_1)	8.1
Shader Model	6.5	no data
OpenGL	4.6	1.4
OpenCL	1.2	N/A
Vulkan	1.2.131	N/A
CUDA	7.5	-

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

---

---

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD	104	no data
1440p	59	no data
4K	39	no data

Cost per frame, $

1080p	2.68	no data
1440p	4.73	no data
4K	7.15	no data

FPS performance in popular games

Pros & cons summary

---

Recency	22 February 2019	1 March 2003
Maximum RAM amount	6 GB	64 MB
Chip lithography	12 nm	150 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	120 Watt	28 Watt

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.

---