Radeon Pro W5700X vs GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Max-Q

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Max-Q with Radeon Pro W5700X, including specs and performance data.

GTX 1050 Ti Max-Q
2018
4 GB GDDR5, 75 Watt
13.86

Pro W5700X outperforms GTX 1050 Ti Max-Q by a whopping 229% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking37475
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data43.59
Power efficiency12.6715.27
ArchitecturePascal (2016−2021)RDNA 1.0 (2019−2020)
GPU code nameGP107Navi 10
Market segmentLaptopWorkstation
Release date3 January 2018 (6 years ago)11 December 2019 (5 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$999

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores7682304
Core clock speed1152 MHz1243 MHz
Boost clock speed1417 MHz2040 MHz
Number of transistors3,300 million10,300 million
Manufacturing process technology14 nm7 nm
Power consumption (TDP)75 Watt205 Watt
Texture fill rate68.02293.8
Floating-point processing power2.177 TFLOPS9.4 TFLOPS
ROPs3264
TMUs48144

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizemedium sizedno data
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x16
Lengthno data305 mm
Widthno dataQuad-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNoneNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount4 GB16 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit256 Bit
Memory clock speed1752 MHz1750 MHz
Memory bandwidth112.1 GB/s448.0 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs1x HDMI, 4x Thunderbolt
HDMI-+
G-SYNC support+-

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

VR Ready+no data

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)12 (12_1)
Shader Model6.46.5
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL1.22.0
Vulkan1.2.1311.2.131
CUDA6.1-

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

GTX 1050 Ti Max-Q 13.86
Pro W5700X 45.65
+229%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

GTX 1050 Ti Max-Q 5339
Pro W5700X 17590
+229%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD56
−221%
180−190
+221%
4K18
−206%
55−60
+206%

Cost per frame, $

1080pno data5.55
4Kno data18.16

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 21−24
−218%
70−75
+218%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 43
−226%
140−150
+226%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 21−24
−218%
70−75
+218%
Battlefield 5 46
−226%
150−160
+226%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 27−30
−221%
90−95
+221%
Cyberpunk 2077 21−24
−218%
70−75
+218%
Far Cry 5 30−35
−213%
100−105
+213%
Far Cry New Dawn 48
−213%
150−160
+213%
Forza Horizon 4 90−95
−219%
290−300
+219%
Hitman 3 24−27
−227%
85−90
+227%
Horizon Zero Dawn 70−75
−219%
230−240
+219%
Metro Exodus 45−50
−219%
150−160
+219%
Red Dead Redemption 2 35−40
−216%
120−130
+216%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 80
−225%
260−270
+225%
Watch Dogs: Legion 75−80
−220%
240−250
+220%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 61
−228%
200−210
+228%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 21−24
−218%
70−75
+218%
Battlefield 5 41
−217%
130−140
+217%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 27−30
−221%
90−95
+221%
Cyberpunk 2077 21−24
−218%
70−75
+218%
Far Cry 5 30−35
−213%
100−105
+213%
Far Cry New Dawn 36
−206%
110−120
+206%
Forza Horizon 4 90−95
−219%
290−300
+219%
Hitman 3 24−27
−227%
85−90
+227%
Horizon Zero Dawn 70−75
−219%
230−240
+219%
Metro Exodus 45−50
−219%
150−160
+219%
Red Dead Redemption 2 35−40
−216%
120−130
+216%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 45−50
−211%
140−150
+211%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 30−35
−224%
110−120
+224%
Watch Dogs: Legion 75−80
−220%
240−250
+220%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 18
−206%
55−60
+206%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 21−24
−218%
70−75
+218%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 27−30
−221%
90−95
+221%
Cyberpunk 2077 21−24
−218%
70−75
+218%
Far Cry 5 30−35
−213%
100−105
+213%
Forza Horizon 4 47
−219%
150−160
+219%
Hitman 3 24−27
−227%
85−90
+227%
Horizon Zero Dawn 70−75
−219%
230−240
+219%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 45−50
−211%
140−150
+211%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 25
−220%
80−85
+220%
Watch Dogs: Legion 75−80
−220%
240−250
+220%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 35−40
−216%
120−130
+216%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5 27−30
−215%
85−90
+215%
Far Cry New Dawn 21−24
−210%
65−70
+210%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 14−16
−221%
45−50
+221%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 10−12
−218%
35−40
+218%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 14−16
−200%
45−50
+200%
Cyberpunk 2077 7−8
−200%
21−24
+200%
Far Cry 5 16−18
−213%
50−55
+213%
Forza Horizon 4 70−75
−224%
230−240
+224%
Hitman 3 16−18
−224%
55−60
+224%
Horizon Zero Dawn 27−30
−221%
90−95
+221%
Metro Exodus 29
−228%
95−100
+228%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 24−27
−213%
75−80
+213%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 14−16
−221%
45−50
+221%
Watch Dogs: Legion 85−90
−226%
280−290
+226%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 21−24
−226%
75−80
+226%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5 10
−200%
30−33
+200%
Far Cry New Dawn 13
−208%
40−45
+208%
Hitman 3 10−11
−200%
30−33
+200%
Horizon Zero Dawn 65−70
−224%
220−230
+224%
Metro Exodus 12−14
−208%
40−45
+208%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 16
−213%
50−55
+213%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 7
−200%
21−24
+200%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 6−7
−200%
18−20
+200%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 7−8
−200%
21−24
+200%
Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
−200%
6−7
+200%
Far Cry 5 7−8
−200%
21−24
+200%
Forza Horizon 4 20
−225%
65−70
+225%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 12−14
−208%
40−45
+208%
Watch Dogs: Legion 5−6
−220%
16−18
+220%

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 12−14
−208%
40−45
+208%

This is how GTX 1050 Ti Max-Q and Pro W5700X compete in popular games:

  • Pro W5700X is 221% faster in 1080p
  • Pro W5700X is 206% faster in 4K

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 13.86 45.65
Recency 3 January 2018 11 December 2019
Maximum RAM amount 4 GB 16 GB
Chip lithography 14 nm 7 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 75 Watt 205 Watt

GTX 1050 Ti Max-Q has 173.3% lower power consumption.

Pro W5700X, on the other hand, has a 229.4% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 1 year, a 300% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 100% more advanced lithography process.

The Radeon Pro W5700X is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Max-Q in performance tests.

Be aware that GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Max-Q is a notebook card while Radeon Pro W5700X is a workstation one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Max-Q
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Max-Q
AMD Radeon Pro W5700X
Radeon Pro W5700X

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.5 103 votes

Rate GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Max-Q on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.9 15 votes

Rate Radeon Pro W5700X on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.