RTX 2000 Ada Generation vs Radeon Pro W5700X
Aggregate performance score
We've compared Radeon Pro W5700X with RTX 2000 Ada Generation, including specs and performance data.
Primary details
GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.
Place in performance ranking | 74 | 76 |
Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation | 47.84 | 38.77 |
Architecture | RDNA 1.0 (2019−2020) | Ada Lovelace (2022−2024) |
GPU code name | Navi 10 | AD107 |
Market segment | Workstation | Desktop |
Release date | 11 December 2019 (4 years ago) | 12 February 2024 (less than a year ago) |
Launch price (MSRP) | $999 | $649 |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation
Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.
Pro W5700X has 23% better value for money than RTX 2000 Ada Generation.
Detailed specifications
General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.
Pipelines / CUDA cores | 2304 | 2816 |
Boost clock speed | 2040 MHz | 2130 MHz |
Number of transistors | 10,300 million | 18,900 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 7 nm | 5 nm |
Power consumption (TDP) | 205 Watt | 70 Watt |
Texture fill rate | 293.8 | 187.4 |
Floating-point performance | 9.4 gflops | no data |
Form factor & compatibility
Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).
Interface | PCIe 4.0 x16 | PCIe 4.0 x8 |
Length | 305 mm | 168 mm |
Width | Quad-slot | 2-slot |
Supplementary power connectors | None | None |
VRAM capacity and type
Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.
Memory type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
Maximum RAM amount | 16 GB | 16 GB |
Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 128 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 14000 MHz | 16 GB/s |
Memory bandwidth | 448.0 GB/s | 256.0 GB/s |
Connectivity and outputs
Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.
Display Connectors | 1x HDMI, 4x Thunderbolt | 4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a |
HDMI | + | - |
API compatibility
List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.
DirectX | 12 (12_1) | 12 Ultimate (12_2) |
Shader Model | 6.5 | 6.7 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
OpenCL | 2.0 | 3.0 |
Vulkan | 1.2.131 | 1.3 |
CUDA | - | 8.9 |
Synthetic benchmark performance
Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.
Combined synthetic benchmark score
This is our combined benchmark performance score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.
Passmark
This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark, part of Passmark PerformanceTest suite. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.
GeekBench 5 OpenCL
Geekbench 5 is a widespread graphics card benchmark combined from 11 different test scenarios. All these scenarios rely on direct usage of GPU's processing power, no 3D rendering is involved. This variation uses OpenCL API by Khronos Group.
GeekBench 5 Vulkan
Geekbench 5 is a widespread graphics card benchmark combined from 11 different test scenarios. All these scenarios rely on direct usage of GPU's processing power, no 3D rendering is involved. This variation uses Vulkan API by AMD & Khronos Group.
Gaming performance
Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.
Pros & cons summary
Performance score | 45.58 | 45.38 |
Recency | 11 December 2019 | 12 February 2024 |
Chip lithography | 7 nm | 5 nm |
Power consumption (TDP) | 205 Watt | 70 Watt |
Pro W5700X has a 0.4% higher aggregate performance score.
RTX 2000 Ada Generation, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 4 years, a 40% more advanced lithography process, and 192.9% lower power consumption.
Given the minimal performance differences, no clear winner can be declared between Radeon Pro W5700X and RTX 2000 Ada Generation.
Be aware that Radeon Pro W5700X is a workstation graphics card while RTX 2000 Ada Generation is a desktop one.
Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Comparisons with similar GPUs
We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.