Radeon Pro 5600M vs GeForce GTX 1050 Max-Q

Place in the ranking	436	236
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Power efficiency	9.66	33.06
Architecture	Pascal (2016−2021)	RDNA 1.0 (2019−2020)
GPU code name	GP107	Navi 12
Market segment	Laptop	Mobile workstation
Release date	3 January 2018 (7 years ago)	15 June 2020 (4 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	640	2560
Core clock speed	1190 MHz	1000 MHz
Boost clock speed	1328 MHz	1030 MHz
Number of transistors	3,300 million	no data
Manufacturing process technology	14 nm	7 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	75 Watt	50 Watt
Texture fill rate	53.12	164.8
Floating-point processing power	1.7 TFLOPS	5.274 TFLOPS
ROPs	16	64
TMUs	40	160

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop size	large	medium sized
Interface	PCIe 3.0 x16	PCIe 4.0 x16
Supplementary power connectors	None	None

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	GDDR5	HBM2
Maximum RAM amount	4 GB	8 GB
Memory bus width	128 Bit	2048 Bit
Memory clock speed	1752 MHz	770 MHz
Memory bandwidth	112.1 GB/s	394.2 GB/s
Shared memory	-	-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors

No outputs

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	12 (12_1)	12 (12_1)
Shader Model	6.4	6.5
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
OpenCL	1.2	2.0
Vulkan	1.2.131	1.2
CUDA	6.1	-

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

GTX 1050 Max-Q 10.53

Pro 5600M 24.01
+128%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

GTX 1050 Max-Q 4047

Pro 5600M 9232
+128%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD	45 −122%	100−110 +122%
1440p	27 −122%	60−65 +122%
4K	15 −100%	30−35 +100%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2	18−20 −132%	40−45 +132%
Cyberpunk 2077	20−22 −145%	45−50 +145%
Elden Ring	30−33 −160%	75−80 +160%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5	30−35 −118%	70−75 +118%
Counter-Strike 2	18−20 −132%	40−45 +132%
Cyberpunk 2077	20−22 −145%	45−50 +145%
Forza Horizon 4	40−45 −148%	100−110 +148%
Metro Exodus	39 −61.5%	60−65 +61.5%
Red Dead Redemption 2	44 −20.5%	50−55 +20.5%
Valorant	40−45 −143%	95−100 +143%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5	30−35 −118%	70−75 +118%
Counter-Strike 2	18−20 −132%	40−45 +132%
Cyberpunk 2077	20−22 −145%	45−50 +145%
Dota 2	68 −22.1%	80−85 +22.1%
Elden Ring	30−33 −160%	75−80 +160%
Far Cry 5	65 −15.4%	75−80 +15.4%
Fortnite	47 −160%	120−130 +160%
Forza Horizon 4	40−45 −148%	100−110 +148%
Grand Theft Auto V	45 −84.4%	80−85 +84.4%
Metro Exodus	26 −142%	60−65 +142%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	127 −20.5%	150−160 +20.5%
Red Dead Redemption 2	13 −308%	50−55 +308%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	30−35 −141%	75−80 +141%
Valorant	26 −273%	95−100 +273%
World of Tanks	144 −76.4%	250−260 +76.4%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	30−35 −118%	70−75 +118%
Counter-Strike 2	18−20 −132%	40−45 +132%
Cyberpunk 2077	20−22 −145%	45−50 +145%
Dota 2	104 +25.3%	80−85 −25.3%
Far Cry 5	51 −47.1%	75−80 +47.1%
Forza Horizon 4	40−45 −148%	100−110 +148%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	26 −488%	150−160 +488%
Valorant	40−45 −143%	95−100 +143%

1440p
High Preset

Dota 2	12−14 −208%	40−45 +208%
Elden Ring	14−16 −180%	40−45 +180%
Grand Theft Auto V	14−16 −186%	40−45 +186%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	50−55 −250%	170−180 +250%
Red Dead Redemption 2	9−10 −144%	21−24 +144%
World of Tanks	94 −70.2%	160−170 +70.2%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	20−22 −140%	45−50 +140%
Counter-Strike 2	10−12 −81.8%	20−22 +81.8%
Cyberpunk 2077	8−9 −150%	20−22 +150%
Far Cry 5	33 −109%	65−70 +109%
Forza Horizon 4	21−24 −174%	60−65 +174%
Metro Exodus	24 −129%	55−60 +129%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	12−14 −169%	35−40 +169%
Valorant	24−27 −146%	60−65 +146%

4K
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2	5−6 −320%	21−24 +320%
Dota 2	28 −46.4%	40−45 +46.4%
Elden Ring	6−7 −217%	18−20 +217%
Grand Theft Auto V	28 −46.4%	40−45 +46.4%
Metro Exodus	7 −157%	18−20 +157%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	37 −97.3%	70−75 +97.3%
Red Dead Redemption 2	7−8 −114%	14−16 +114%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	28 −46.4%	40−45 +46.4%
World of Tanks	53 −126%	120−130 +126%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	9−10 −178%	24−27 +178%
Counter-Strike 2	5−6 −320%	21−24 +320%
Cyberpunk 2077	3−4 −167%	8−9 +167%
Dota 2	37 −10.8%	40−45 +10.8%
Far Cry 5	16 −100%	30−35 +100%
Fortnite	10−12 −173%	30−33 +173%
Forza Horizon 4	12−14 −185%	35−40 +185%
Valorant	10−12 −182%	30−35 +182%

This is how GTX 1050 Max-Q and Pro 5600M compete in popular games:

Pro 5600M is 122% faster in 1080p
Pro 5600M is 122% faster in 1440p
Pro 5600M is 100% faster in 4K

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

in Dota 2, with 1080p resolution and the Ultra Preset, the GTX 1050 Max-Q is 25% faster.
in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS, with 1080p resolution and the Ultra Preset, the Pro 5600M is 488% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

GTX 1050 Max-Q is ahead in 1 test (2%)
Pro 5600M is ahead in 62 tests (98%)

Pros & cons summary

Performance score	10.53	24.01
Recency	3 January 2018	15 June 2020
Maximum RAM amount	4 GB	8 GB
Chip lithography	14 nm	7 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	75 Watt	50 Watt

Pro 5600M has a 128% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 2 years, a 100% higher maximum VRAM amount, a 100% more advanced lithography process, and 50% lower power consumption.

The Radeon Pro 5600M is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce GTX 1050 Max-Q in performance tests.

Be aware that GeForce GTX 1050 Max-Q is a notebook graphics card while Radeon Pro 5600M is a mobile workstation one.

Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.