Quadro RTX A6000 vs GeForce GT 650M SLI

Place in the ranking	625	38
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation	no data	10.36
Power efficiency	no data	13.63
Architecture	Kepler (2012−2018)	Ampere (2020−2024)
GPU code name	N13E-GE	GA102
Market segment	Laptop	Workstation
Release date	22 March 2012 (12 years ago)	5 October 2020 (4 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)	no data	$4,649

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	768	10752
Core clock speed	790 MHz	1410 MHz
Boost clock speed	835 MHz	1800 MHz
Number of transistors	no data	28,300 million
Manufacturing process technology	28 nm	8 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	no data	300 Watt
Texture fill rate	no data	604.8
Floating-point processing power	no data	38.71 TFLOPS
ROPs	no data	112
TMUs	no data	336
Tensor Cores	no data	336
Ray Tracing Cores	no data	84

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop size	medium sized	no data
Interface	no data	PCIe 4.0 x16
Length	no data	267 mm
Width	no data	2-slot
Supplementary power connectors	no data	8-pin EPS

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	GDDR5	GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount	2x2 GB	48 GB
Memory bus width	2x 128 Bit	384 Bit
Memory clock speed	4000 MHz	2000 MHz
Memory bandwidth	no data	768.0 GB/s
Shared memory	-	-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors

no data

4x DisplayPort 1.4a

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Optimus

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	11	12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model	no data	6.7
OpenGL	no data	4.6
OpenCL	no data	3.0
Vulkan	-	1.3
CUDA	+	8.6

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

GT 650M SLI 5.08

RTX A6000 58.63
+1054%

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

GT 650M SLI 3597

RTX A6000 50957
+1317%

3DMark Vantage Performance

3DMark Vantage is an outdated DirectX 10 benchmark using 1280x1024 screen resolution. It taxes the graphics card with two scenes, one depicting a girl escaping some militarized base located within a sea cave, the other displaying a space fleet attack on a defenseless planet. It was discontinued in April 2017, and Time Spy benchmark is now recommended to be used instead.

GT 650M SLI 12812

RTX A6000 89510
+599%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

900p	79 −1039%	900−950 +1039%
Full HD	49 −259%	176 +259%
1440p	10−12 −1250%	135 +1250%
4K	10−12 −1070%	117 +1070%

Cost per frame, $

1080p	no data	26.41
1440p	no data	34.44
4K	no data	39.74

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077

9−10

−722%

70−75
+722%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	14−16 −529%	85−90 +529%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	5−6 −1340%	70−75 +1340%
Battlefield 5	12−14 −923%	130−140 +923%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	10−12 −664%	80−85 +664%
Cyberpunk 2077	9−10 −722%	70−75 +722%
Far Cry 5	10−12 −709%	85−90 +709%
Far Cry New Dawn	14−16 −629%	100−110 +629%
Forza Horizon 4	30−35 −516%	190−200 +516%
Hitman 3	10−12 −709%	85−90 +709%
Horizon Zero Dawn	30−35 −418%	170−180 +418%
Metro Exodus	12−14 −992%	130−140 +992%
Red Dead Redemption 2	14−16 −579%	95−100 +579%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	18−20 −756%	150−160 +756%
Watch Dogs: Legion	45−50 −181%	130−140 +181%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	14−16 −529%	85−90 +529%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	5−6 −1340%	70−75 +1340%
Battlefield 5	12−14 −923%	130−140 +923%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	10−12 −664%	80−85 +664%
Cyberpunk 2077	9−10 −722%	70−75 +722%
Far Cry 5	10−12 −709%	85−90 +709%
Far Cry New Dawn	14−16 −629%	100−110 +629%
Forza Horizon 4	30−35 −516%	190−200 +516%
Hitman 3	10−12 −709%	85−90 +709%
Horizon Zero Dawn	30−35 −418%	170−180 +418%
Metro Exodus	12−14 −992%	130−140 +992%
Red Dead Redemption 2	14−16 −579%	95−100 +579%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	18−20 −1528%	293 +1528%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	18−20 −378%	85−90 +378%
Watch Dogs: Legion	45−50 −181%	130−140 +181%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	14−16 −529%	85−90 +529%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	5−6 −1340%	70−75 +1340%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	10−12 −664%	80−85 +664%
Cyberpunk 2077	9−10 −722%	70−75 +722%
Far Cry 5	10−12 −709%	85−90 +709%
Forza Horizon 4	30−35 −516%	190−200 +516%
Hitman 3	10−12 −709%	85−90 +709%
Horizon Zero Dawn	30−35 −579%	224 +579%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	18−20 −1500%	288 +1500%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	18−20 −900%	180 +900%
Watch Dogs: Legion	45−50 −181%	130−140 +181%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

14−16

−579%

95−100
+579%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5	9−10 −800%	80−85 +800%
Far Cry New Dawn	8−9 −700%	60−65 +700%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	5−6 −800%	45−50 +800%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	0−1	45−50
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	4−5 −1125%	45−50 +1125%
Cyberpunk 2077	2−3 −1600%	30−35 +1600%
Far Cry 5	6−7 −700%	45−50 +700%
Forza Horizon 4	12−14 −1817%	230−240 +1817%
Hitman 3	9−10 −511%	55−60 +511%
Horizon Zero Dawn	10−12 −1809%	210 +1809%
Metro Exodus	3−4 −2000%	63 +2000%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	4−5 −1450%	60−65 +1450%
Watch Dogs: Legion	30−35 −519%	190−200 +519%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

9−10

−700%

70−75
+700%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5	4−5 −950%	40−45 +950%
Far Cry New Dawn	3−4 −1067%	35−40 +1067%
Hitman 3	1−2 −3300%	30−35 +3300%
Horizon Zero Dawn	8−9 −2250%	180−190 +2250%
Metro Exodus	2−3 −2600%	50−55 +2600%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	1−2 −14500%	146 +14500%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	3−4 −867%	27−30 +867%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	2−3 −1250%	27−30 +1250%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	2−3 −1250%	27−30 +1250%
Cyberpunk 2077	0−1	14−16
Far Cry 5	2−3 −1150%	24−27 +1150%
Forza Horizon 4	4−5 −1350%	55−60 +1350%
Watch Dogs: Legion	1−2 −2000%	21−24 +2000%