ATI Radeon HD 3870 vs GeForce GT 650M SLI

Aggregate performance score

We've compared GeForce GT 650M SLI with Radeon HD 3870, including specs and performance data.

GT 650M SLI
2012
2x2 GB GDDR5
5.08
+253%

GT 650M SLI outperforms ATI HD 3870 by a whopping 253% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking625993
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data0.06
Power efficiencyno data0.95
ArchitectureKepler (2012−2018)TeraScale (2005−2013)
GPU code nameN13E-GERV670
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date22 March 2012 (12 years ago)19 November 2007 (17 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$269

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores768320
Core clock speed790 MHz777 MHz
Boost clock speed835 MHzno data
Number of transistorsno data666 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm55 nm
Power consumption (TDP)no data106 Watt
Texture fill rateno data12.43
Floating-point processing powerno data0.4973 TFLOPS
ROPsno data16
TMUsno data16

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizemedium sizedno data
Interfaceno dataPCIe 2.0 x16
Lengthno data241 mm
Widthno data2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno data1x 6-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR4
Maximum RAM amount2x2 GB512 MB
Memory bus width2x 128 Bit256 Bit
Memory clock speed4000 MHz1126 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data72.06 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectorsno data2x DVI, 1x S-Video

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Optimus+-

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX1110.1 (10_1)
Shader Modelno data4.1
OpenGLno data3.3
OpenCLno dataN/A
Vulkan-N/A
CUDA+-

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

900p79
+276%
21−24
−276%
Full HD49
+308%
12−14
−308%

Cost per frame, $

1080pno data22.42

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 9−10
+350%
2−3
−350%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 14−16
+367%
3−4
−367%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 5−6
+400%
1−2
−400%
Battlefield 5 12−14
+333%
3−4
−333%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 10−12
+267%
3−4
−267%
Cyberpunk 2077 9−10
+350%
2−3
−350%
Far Cry 5 10−12
+267%
3−4
−267%
Far Cry New Dawn 14−16
+367%
3−4
−367%
Forza Horizon 4 30−35
+256%
9−10
−256%
Hitman 3 10−12
+267%
3−4
−267%
Horizon Zero Dawn 30−35
+267%
9−10
−267%
Metro Exodus 12−14
+300%
3−4
−300%
Red Dead Redemption 2 14−16
+367%
3−4
−367%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 18−20
+260%
5−6
−260%
Watch Dogs: Legion 45−50
+292%
12−14
−292%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 14−16
+367%
3−4
−367%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 5−6
+400%
1−2
−400%
Battlefield 5 12−14
+333%
3−4
−333%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 10−12
+267%
3−4
−267%
Cyberpunk 2077 9−10
+350%
2−3
−350%
Far Cry 5 10−12
+267%
3−4
−267%
Far Cry New Dawn 14−16
+367%
3−4
−367%
Forza Horizon 4 30−35
+256%
9−10
−256%
Hitman 3 10−12
+267%
3−4
−267%
Horizon Zero Dawn 30−35
+267%
9−10
−267%
Metro Exodus 12−14
+300%
3−4
−300%
Red Dead Redemption 2 14−16
+367%
3−4
−367%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 18−20
+260%
5−6
−260%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 18−20
+260%
5−6
−260%
Watch Dogs: Legion 45−50
+292%
12−14
−292%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 14−16
+367%
3−4
−367%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 5−6
+400%
1−2
−400%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 10−12
+267%
3−4
−267%
Cyberpunk 2077 9−10
+350%
2−3
−350%
Far Cry 5 10−12
+267%
3−4
−267%
Forza Horizon 4 30−35
+256%
9−10
−256%
Hitman 3 10−12
+267%
3−4
−267%
Horizon Zero Dawn 30−35
+267%
9−10
−267%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 18−20
+260%
5−6
−260%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 18−20
+260%
5−6
−260%
Watch Dogs: Legion 45−50
+292%
12−14
−292%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 14−16
+367%
3−4
−367%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5 9−10
+350%
2−3
−350%
Far Cry New Dawn 8−9
+300%
2−3
−300%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 5−6
+400%
1−2
−400%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 0−1 0−1
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 4−5
+300%
1−2
−300%
Cyberpunk 2077 2−3 0−1
Far Cry 5 6−7
+500%
1−2
−500%
Forza Horizon 4 12−14
+300%
3−4
−300%
Hitman 3 9−10
+350%
2−3
−350%
Horizon Zero Dawn 10−12
+267%
3−4
−267%
Metro Exodus 3−4 0−1
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 4−5
+300%
1−2
−300%
Watch Dogs: Legion 30−35
+256%
9−10
−256%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 9−10
+350%
2−3
−350%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5 4−5
+300%
1−2
−300%
Far Cry New Dawn 3−4 0−1
Hitman 3 1−2 0−1
Horizon Zero Dawn 8−9
+300%
2−3
−300%
Metro Exodus 2−3 0−1
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 1−2 0−1

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 3−4 0−1
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 2−3 0−1
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 2−3 0−1
Cyberpunk 2077 0−1 0−1
Far Cry 5 2−3 0−1
Forza Horizon 4 4−5
+300%
1−2
−300%
Watch Dogs: Legion 1−2 0−1

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 6−7
+500%
1−2
−500%

This is how GT 650M SLI and ATI HD 3870 compete in popular games:

  • GT 650M SLI is 276% faster in 900p
  • GT 650M SLI is 308% faster in 1080p

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 5.08 1.44
Recency 22 March 2012 19 November 2007
Chip lithography 28 nm 55 nm

GT 650M SLI has a 252.8% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 4 years, and a 96.4% more advanced lithography process.

The GeForce GT 650M SLI is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon HD 3870 in performance tests.

Be aware that GeForce GT 650M SLI is a notebook card while Radeon HD 3870 is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce GT 650M SLI
GeForce GT 650M SLI
ATI Radeon HD 3870
Radeon HD 3870

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.3 28 votes

Rate GeForce GT 650M SLI on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.6 161 vote

Rate Radeon HD 3870 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.