GeForce GTX 1650 vs FirePro M6000

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared FirePro M6000 with GeForce GTX 1650, including specs and performance data.

FirePro M6000
2012
2 GB GDDR5, 43 Watt
4.72

GTX 1650 outperforms M6000 by a whopping 333% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking643265
Place by popularitynot in top-1003
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data40.32
Power efficiency8.0619.98
ArchitectureGCN 1.0 (2011−2020)Turing (2018−2022)
GPU code nameHeathrowTU117
Market segmentMobile workstationDesktop
Release date1 July 2012 (12 years ago)23 April 2019 (5 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$149

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores640896
Core clock speed800 MHz1485 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1665 MHz
Number of transistors1,500 million4,700 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm12 nm
Power consumption (TDP)43 Watt75 Watt
Texture fill rate32.0093.24
Floating-point processing power1.024 TFLOPS2.984 TFLOPS
ROPs1632
TMUs4056

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizemedium sizedno data
Bus supportn/ano data
InterfaceMXM-B (3.0)PCIe 3.0 x16
Lengthno data229 mm
Widthno data2-slot
Form factorMXM-Bno data
Supplementary power connectorsNoneNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount2 GB4 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed1000 MHz2000 MHz
Memory bandwidth72 GB/s128.0 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort
HDMI-+
StereoOutput3D+-

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_1)12 (12_1)
Shader Model5.16.5
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL1.21.2
Vulkan1.2.1311.2.131
CUDA-7.5

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

FirePro M6000 4.72
GTX 1650 20.42
+333%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

FirePro M6000 1820
GTX 1650 7875
+333%

3DMark Vantage Performance

3DMark Vantage is an outdated DirectX 10 benchmark using 1280x1024 screen resolution. It taxes the graphics card with two scenes, one depicting a girl escaping some militarized base located within a sea cave, the other displaying a space fleet attack on a defenseless planet. It was discontinued in April 2017, and Time Spy benchmark is now recommended to be used instead.

FirePro M6000 10744
GTX 1650 44694
+316%

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

FirePro M6000 2422
GTX 1650 13645
+463%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

900p58
−331%
250−260
+331%
Full HD44
−59.1%
70
+59.1%
1440p8−9
−375%
38
+375%
4K5−6
−360%
23
+360%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 8−9
−300%
30−35
+300%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 12−14
−308%
53
+308%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 5−6
−840%
47
+840%
Battlefield 5 12−14
−558%
79
+558%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 10−11
−420%
52
+420%
Cyberpunk 2077 8−9
−300%
30−35
+300%
Far Cry 5 10−11
−540%
64
+540%
Far Cry New Dawn 12−14
−515%
80
+515%
Forza Horizon 4 27−30
−690%
229
+690%
Hitman 3 10−11
−390%
49
+390%
Horizon Zero Dawn 30−35
−842%
292
+842%
Metro Exodus 10−12
−818%
101
+818%
Red Dead Redemption 2 12−14
−542%
77
+542%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 16−18
−576%
115
+576%
Watch Dogs: Legion 45−50
−398%
224
+398%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 12−14
−538%
83
+538%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 5−6
−600%
35
+600%
Battlefield 5 12−14
−500%
72
+500%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 10−11
−360%
46
+360%
Cyberpunk 2077 8−9
−300%
30−35
+300%
Far Cry 5 10−11
−420%
52
+420%
Far Cry New Dawn 12−14
−331%
56
+331%
Forza Horizon 4 27−30
−593%
201
+593%
Hitman 3 10−11
−370%
47
+370%
Horizon Zero Dawn 30−35
−739%
260
+739%
Metro Exodus 10−12
−545%
71
+545%
Red Dead Redemption 2 12−14
−358%
55
+358%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 16−18
−335%
74
+335%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 16−18
−171%
45−50
+171%
Watch Dogs: Legion 45−50
−358%
206
+358%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 12−14
−92.3%
25
+92.3%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 5−6
−160%
13
+160%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 10−11
+25%
8
−25%
Cyberpunk 2077 8−9
−300%
30−35
+300%
Far Cry 5 10−11
−290%
39
+290%
Forza Horizon 4 27−30
−124%
65
+124%
Hitman 3 10−11
−310%
41
+310%
Horizon Zero Dawn 30−35
−93.5%
60
+93.5%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 16−18
−265%
62
+265%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 16−18
−147%
42
+147%
Watch Dogs: Legion 45−50
+114%
21
−114%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 12−14
−350%
54
+350%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5 9−10
−367%
42
+367%
Far Cry New Dawn 7−8
−414%
36
+414%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 4−5
−350%
18
+350%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 4−5
−475%
21−24
+475%
Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
−500%
12−14
+500%
Far Cry 5 5−6
−380%
24
+380%
Forza Horizon 4 9−10
−1256%
122
+1256%
Hitman 3 9−10
−200%
27
+200%
Horizon Zero Dawn 10−12
−291%
43
+291%
Metro Exodus 2−3
−1950%
41
+1950%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 4−5
−500%
24−27
+500%
Watch Dogs: Legion 30−33
−383%
145
+383%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 9−10
−289%
35
+289%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5 3−4
−567%
20
+567%
Far Cry New Dawn 3−4
−467%
17
+467%
Hitman 3 1−2
−1200%
13
+1200%
Horizon Zero Dawn 5−6
−720%
41
+720%
Metro Exodus 1−2
−2600%
27
+2600%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 1−2
−2500%
26
+2500%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 3−4
−333%
13
+333%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 2−3
−150%
5
+150%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 2−3
−450%
10−12
+450%
Cyberpunk 2077 0−1 4−5
Far Cry 5 2−3
−500%
12
+500%
Forza Horizon 4 4−5
−650%
30
+650%
Watch Dogs: Legion 1−2
−700%
8
+700%

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 5−6
−240%
17
+240%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Valhalla 13
+0%
13
+0%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 45
+0%
45
+0%

4K
Ultra Preset

Shadow of the Tomb Raider 26
+0%
26
+0%

This is how FirePro M6000 and GTX 1650 compete in popular games:

  • GTX 1650 is 331% faster in 900p
  • GTX 1650 is 59% faster in 1080p
  • GTX 1650 is 375% faster in 1440p
  • GTX 1650 is 360% faster in 4K

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Watch Dogs: Legion, with 1080p resolution and the Ultra Preset, the FirePro M6000 is 114% faster.
  • in Metro Exodus, with 4K resolution and the High Preset, the GTX 1650 is 2600% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • FirePro M6000 is ahead in 2 tests (3%)
  • GTX 1650 is ahead in 66 tests (93%)
  • there's a draw in 3 tests (4%)

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 4.72 20.42
Recency 1 July 2012 23 April 2019
Maximum RAM amount 2 GB 4 GB
Chip lithography 28 nm 12 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 43 Watt 75 Watt

FirePro M6000 has 74.4% lower power consumption.

GTX 1650, on the other hand, has a 332.6% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 6 years, a 100% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 133.3% more advanced lithography process.

The GeForce GTX 1650 is our recommended choice as it beats the FirePro M6000 in performance tests.

Be aware that FirePro M6000 is a mobile workstation card while GeForce GTX 1650 is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD FirePro M6000
FirePro M6000
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650
GeForce GTX 1650

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.8 10 votes

Rate FirePro M6000 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.8 22668 votes

Rate GeForce GTX 1650 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.