GeForce RTX 3050 6 GB vs Arc A550M

VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Arc A550M with GeForce RTX 3050 6 GB, including specs and performance data.

Arc A550M
2022
8 GB GDDR6, 60 Watt
24.57

RTX 3050 6 GB outperforms Arc A550M by a moderate 12% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking223199
Place by popularitynot in top-10021
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data75.37
Power efficiency28.5627.45
ArchitectureGeneration 12.7 (2022−2023)Ampere (2020−2024)
GPU code nameDG2-512GA107
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date2022 (2 years ago)2 February 2024 (less than a year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$179

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores20482304
Core clock speed900 MHz1042 MHz
Boost clock speed2050 MHz1470 MHz
Number of transistors21,700 million8,700 million
Manufacturing process technology6 nm8 nm
Power consumption (TDP)60 Watt70 Watt
Texture fill rate262.4105.8
Floating-point processing power8.397 TFLOPS6.774 TFLOPS
ROPs6432
TMUs12872
Tensor Cores25672
Ray Tracing Cores1618

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 4.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x8
Lengthno data242 mm
Widthno data2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount8 GB6 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit96 Bit
Memory clock speed1750 MHz1750 MHz
Memory bandwidth224.0 GB/s168.0 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsPortable Device Dependent1x HDMI 2.1, 3x DisplayPort 1.4a
HDMI-+

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 Ultimate (12_2)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model6.66.7
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL3.03.0
Vulkan1.31.3
CUDA-8.6

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 35−40
−2.6%
40−45
+2.6%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 50−55
−5.8%
55−60
+5.8%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 40−45
−9.8%
45−50
+9.8%
Battlefield 5 75−80
−9%
85−90
+9%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 45−50
−2%
50−55
+2%
Cyberpunk 2077 35−40
−2.6%
40−45
+2.6%
Far Cry 5 55−60
−9.1%
60−65
+9.1%
Far Cry New Dawn 60−65
−11.1%
70−75
+11.1%
Forza Horizon 4 140−150
−6.4%
150−160
+6.4%
Hitman 3 45−50
−4.2%
50−55
+4.2%
Horizon Zero Dawn 110−120
−8.1%
120−130
+8.1%
Metro Exodus 80−85
−9.8%
90−95
+9.8%
Red Dead Redemption 2 60−65
−4.8%
65−70
+4.8%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 80−85
−6.3%
85−90
+6.3%
Watch Dogs: Legion 100−110
−8.9%
110−120
+8.9%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 50−55
−5.8%
55−60
+5.8%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 40−45
−9.8%
45−50
+9.8%
Battlefield 5 75−80
−9%
85−90
+9%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 45−50
−2%
50−55
+2%
Cyberpunk 2077 35−40
−2.6%
40−45
+2.6%
Far Cry 5 55−60
−9.1%
60−65
+9.1%
Far Cry New Dawn 60−65
−11.1%
70−75
+11.1%
Forza Horizon 4 140−150
−6.4%
150−160
+6.4%
Hitman 3 45−50
−4.2%
50−55
+4.2%
Horizon Zero Dawn 110−120
−8.1%
120−130
+8.1%
Metro Exodus 80−85
−9.8%
90−95
+9.8%
Red Dead Redemption 2 60−65
−4.8%
65−70
+4.8%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 80−85
−6.3%
85−90
+6.3%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 50−55
−5.8%
55−60
+5.8%
Watch Dogs: Legion 100−110
−8.9%
110−120
+8.9%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 50−55
−5.8%
55−60
+5.8%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 40−45
−9.8%
45−50
+9.8%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 45−50
−2%
50−55
+2%
Cyberpunk 2077 35−40
−2.6%
40−45
+2.6%
Far Cry 5 55−60
−9.1%
60−65
+9.1%
Forza Horizon 4 140−150
−6.4%
150−160
+6.4%
Hitman 3 45−50
−4.2%
50−55
+4.2%
Horizon Zero Dawn 110−120
−8.1%
120−130
+8.1%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 80−85
−6.3%
85−90
+6.3%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 50−55
−5.8%
55−60
+5.8%
Watch Dogs: Legion 100−110
−8.9%
110−120
+8.9%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 60−65
−4.8%
65−70
+4.8%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5 45−50
−11.1%
50−55
+11.1%
Far Cry New Dawn 35−40
−11.1%
40−45
+11.1%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 24−27
−8%
27−30
+8%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 21−24
−4.3%
24−27
+4.3%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 27−30
−11.1%
30−33
+11.1%
Cyberpunk 2077 14−16
−6.7%
16−18
+6.7%
Far Cry 5 27−30
−7.1%
30−33
+7.1%
Forza Horizon 4 130−140
−10.3%
150−160
+10.3%
Hitman 3 27−30
−7.1%
30−33
+7.1%
Horizon Zero Dawn 45−50
−2%
50−55
+2%
Metro Exodus 45−50
−11.1%
50−55
+11.1%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 50−55
−7.8%
55−60
+7.8%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 27−30
−3.4%
30−33
+3.4%
Watch Dogs: Legion 130−140
−10.3%
150−160
+10.3%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 40−45
+0%
40−45
+0%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5 21−24
−4.3%
24−27
+4.3%
Far Cry New Dawn 18−20
+0%
18−20
+0%
Hitman 3 18−20
−10.5%
21−24
+10.5%
Horizon Zero Dawn 120−130
−5.7%
130−140
+5.7%
Metro Exodus 27−30
−11.1%
30−33
+11.1%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 24−27
−3.8%
27−30
+3.8%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 12−14
−7.7%
14−16
+7.7%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 12−14
−7.7%
14−16
+7.7%
Cyberpunk 2077 6−7
+0%
6−7
+0%
Far Cry 5 12−14
−7.7%
14−16
+7.7%
Forza Horizon 4 30−35
−6.1%
35−40
+6.1%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 27−30
−3.4%
30−33
+3.4%
Watch Dogs: Legion 10−12
−9.1%
12−14
+9.1%

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 21−24
+0%
21−24
+0%

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 24.57 27.55
Maximum RAM amount 8 GB 6 GB
Chip lithography 6 nm 8 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 60 Watt 70 Watt

Arc A550M has a 33.3% higher maximum VRAM amount, a 33.3% more advanced lithography process, and 16.7% lower power consumption.

RTX 3050 6 GB, on the other hand, has a 12.1% higher aggregate performance score.

The GeForce RTX 3050 6 GB is our recommended choice as it beats the Arc A550M in performance tests.

Be aware that Arc A550M is a notebook card while GeForce RTX 3050 6 GB is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


Intel Arc A550M
Arc A550M
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 6 GB
GeForce RTX 3050 6 GB

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4 75 votes

Rate Arc A550M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.7 1033 votes

Rate GeForce RTX 3050 6 GB on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.