GeForce RTX 4090 D vs Arc A730M

Place in the ranking	203	2
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation	no data	17.27
Power efficiency	23.33	14.79
Architecture	Generation 12.7 (2022−2023)	Ada Lovelace (2022−2024)
GPU code name	DG2-512	AD102
Market segment	Laptop	Desktop
Release date	2022 (2 years ago)	28 December 2023 (less than a year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)	no data	$1,599

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	3072	14592
Core clock speed	1100 MHz	2280 MHz
Boost clock speed	2050 MHz	2520 MHz
Number of transistors	21,700 million	76,300 million
Manufacturing process technology	6 nm	5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	80 Watt	425 Watt
Texture fill rate	393.6	1,149
Floating-point processing power	12.6 TFLOPS	73.54 TFLOPS
ROPs	96	176
TMUs	192	456
Tensor Cores	384	456
Ray Tracing Cores	24	114

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop size	medium sized	no data
Interface	PCIe 4.0 x16	PCIe 4.0 x16
Length	no data	304 mm
Width	no data	3-slot
Supplementary power connectors	no data	1x 16-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	GDDR6	GDDR6X
Maximum RAM amount	12 GB	24 GB
Memory bus width	192 Bit	384 Bit
Memory clock speed	1750 MHz	1313 MHz
Memory bandwidth	336.0 GB/s	1,008 GB/s
Shared memory	-	-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors	Portable Device Dependent	1x HDMI 2.1, 3x DisplayPort 1.4a
HDMI	-	+

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	12 Ultimate (12_2)	12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model	6.6	6.7
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
OpenCL	3.0	3.0
Vulkan	1.3	1.3
CUDA	-	8.9

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Arc A730M 27.22

RTX 4090 D 91.70
+237%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Arc A730M 10487

RTX 4090 D 35333
+237%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD	73 −229%	240−250 +229%
1440p	41 −217%	130−140 +217%
4K	23 −226%	75−80 +226%

Cost per frame, $

1080p	no data	6.66
1440p	no data	12.30
4K	no data	21.32

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077

71
−224%

230−240

+224%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	75−80 −233%	250−260 +233%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	64 −228%	210−220 +228%
Battlefield 5	110−120 −207%	350−400 +207%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	70−75 −233%	240−250 +233%
Cyberpunk 2077	64 −228%	210−220 +228%
Far Cry 5	75−80 −233%	260−270 +233%
Far Cry New Dawn	85−90 −226%	290−300 +226%
Forza Horizon 4	180−190 −231%	600−650 +231%
Hitman 3	51 −233%	170−180 +233%
Horizon Zero Dawn	150−160 −231%	500−550 +231%
Metro Exodus	110−120 −202%	350−400 +202%
Red Dead Redemption 2	85−90 −229%	280−290 +229%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	120−130 −215%	400−450 +215%
Watch Dogs: Legion	120−130 −225%	400−450 +225%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	75−80 −233%	250−260 +233%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	54 −233%	180−190 +233%
Battlefield 5	110−120 −207%	350−400 +207%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	70−75 −233%	240−250 +233%
Cyberpunk 2077	54 −233%	180−190 +233%
Far Cry 5	75−80 −233%	260−270 +233%
Far Cry New Dawn	85−90 −226%	290−300 +226%
Forza Horizon 4	180−190 −231%	600−650 +231%
Hitman 3	47 −219%	150−160 +219%
Horizon Zero Dawn	150−160 −231%	500−550 +231%
Metro Exodus	110−120 −202%	350−400 +202%
Red Dead Redemption 2	85−90 −229%	280−290 +229%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	149 −236%	500−550 +236%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	70−75 −229%	240−250 +229%
Watch Dogs: Legion	120−130 −225%	400−450 +225%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	75−80 −233%	250−260 +233%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	48 −233%	160−170 +233%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	70−75 −233%	240−250 +233%
Cyberpunk 2077	52 −227%	170−180 +227%
Far Cry 5	75−80 −233%	260−270 +233%
Forza Horizon 4	180−190 −231%	600−650 +231%
Hitman 3	46 −226%	150−160 +226%
Horizon Zero Dawn	88 −230%	290−300 +230%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	124 −223%	400−450 +223%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	45 −233%	150−160 +233%
Watch Dogs: Legion	48 −233%	160−170 +233%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

85−90
−229%

280−290

+229%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5	65−70 −228%	220−230 +228%
Far Cry New Dawn	50−55 −233%	180−190 +233%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	35−40 −216%	120−130 +216%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	37 −224%	120−130 +224%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	40−45 −217%	130−140 +217%
Cyberpunk 2077	31 −223%	100−105 +223%
Far Cry 5	40−45 −217%	130−140 +217%
Forza Horizon 4	200−210 −222%	650−700 +222%
Hitman 3	39 −233%	130−140 +233%
Horizon Zero Dawn	66 −233%	220−230 +233%
Metro Exodus	65−70 −228%	220−230 +228%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	80−85 −233%	280−290 +233%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	45−50 −227%	160−170 +227%
Watch Dogs: Legion	180−190 −233%	600−650 +233%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

60−65
−233%

200−210

+233%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5	35−40 −214%	110−120 +214%
Far Cry New Dawn	27−30 −228%	95−100 +228%
Hitman 3	27−30 −228%	95−100 +228%
Horizon Zero Dawn	160−170 −225%	550−600 +225%
Metro Exodus	40−45 −218%	140−150 +218%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	40−45 −217%	130−140 +217%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	21−24 −226%	75−80 +226%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	21−24 −233%	70−75 +233%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	21−24 −218%	70−75 +218%
Cyberpunk 2077	10−12 −218%	35−40 +218%
Far Cry 5	20−22 −225%	65−70 +225%
Forza Horizon 4	45−50 −227%	160−170 +227%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	54 −233%	180−190 +233%
Watch Dogs: Legion	16−18 −224%	55−60 +224%

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

30−35
−223%

100−105

+223%

This is how Arc A730M and RTX 4090 D compete in popular games:

RTX 4090 D is 229% faster in 1080p
RTX 4090 D is 217% faster in 1440p
RTX 4090 D is 226% faster in 4K

Pros & cons summary

Performance score	27.22	91.70
Maximum RAM amount	12 GB	24 GB
Chip lithography	6 nm	5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	80 Watt	425 Watt

Arc A730M has 431.3% lower power consumption.

RTX 4090 D, on the other hand, has a 236.9% higher aggregate performance score, a 100% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 20% more advanced lithography process.

The GeForce RTX 4090 D is our recommended choice as it beats the Arc A730M in performance tests.

Be aware that Arc A730M is a notebook card while GeForce RTX 4090 D is a desktop one.

Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.