ATI Rage 128 PRO Ultra vs Arc A350M

VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking355not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency41.09no data
ArchitectureGeneration 12.7 (2022−2023)Rage 4 (1998−1999)
GPU code nameDG2-128Rage 4 PRO
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date30 March 2022 (2 years ago)1 August 1999 (25 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores768no data
Core clock speed300 MHz130 MHz
Boost clock speed1150 MHzno data
Number of transistors7,200 million8 million
Manufacturing process technology6 nm250 nm
Power consumption (TDP)25 Wattno data
Texture fill rate55.200.26
Floating-point processing power1.766 TFLOPSno data
ROPs242
TMUs482
Ray Tracing Cores6no data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 4.0 x8AGP 4x
Widthno data1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6SDR
Maximum RAM amount4 GB32 MB
Memory bus width64 Bit64 Bit
Memory clock speed1750 MHz130 MHz
Memory bandwidth112.0 GB/s1.04 GB/s
Shared memory-no data

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs1x VGA

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 Ultimate (12_2)6.0
Shader Model6.6no data
OpenGL4.61.2
OpenCL3.0N/A
Vulkan1.3N/A

Pros & cons summary


Recency 30 March 2022 1 August 1999
Maximum RAM amount 4 GB 32 MB
Chip lithography 6 nm 250 nm

Arc A350M has an age advantage of 22 years, a 12700% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 4066.7% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Arc A350M and Rage 128 PRO Ultra. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Arc A350M is a notebook card while Rage 128 PRO Ultra is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


Intel Arc A350M
Arc A350M
ATI Rage 128 PRO Ultra
Rage 128 PRO Ultra

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.8 57 votes

Rate Arc A350M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.6 7 votes

Rate Rage 128 PRO Ultra on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.