ATI Radeon HD 2600 PRO vs Arc 8-Core iGPU

VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Arc 8-Core iGPU with Radeon HD 2600 PRO, including specs and performance data.

Arc 8-Core iGPU
2023
18.53
+3269%

Arc 8-Core iGPU outperforms ATI HD 2600 PRO by a whopping 3269% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking3011222
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiencyno data1.08
ArchitectureXe LPG (2023)TeraScale (2005−2013)
GPU code nameMeteor Lake iGPURV630
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date14 December 2023 (1 year ago)28 June 2007 (17 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores8120
Core clock speedno data600 MHz
Boost clock speed2300 MHzno data
Number of transistorsno data390 million
Manufacturing process technology5 nm65 nm
Power consumption (TDP)no data35 Watt
Texture fill rateno data4.800
Floating-point processing powerno data0.144 TFLOPS
ROPsno data4
TMUsno data8

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Interfaceno dataPCIe 1.0 x16
Widthno data1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeno dataDDR2
Maximum RAM amountno data512 MB
Memory bus widthno data128 Bit
Memory clock speedno data500 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data16 GB/s
Shared memory-no data

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectorsno data2x DVI, 1x S-Video

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12_210.0 (10_0)
Shader Modelno data4.0
OpenGLno data3.3
OpenCLno dataN/A
Vulkan-N/A

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD36
+3500%
1−2
−3500%
1440p190−1
4K15-0−1

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2 26 0−1
Elden Ring 30 0−1

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5 55−60
+5800%
1−2
−5800%
Counter-Strike 2 23 0−1
Forza Horizon 4 71
+3450%
2−3
−3450%
Metro Exodus 40
+3900%
1−2
−3900%
Red Dead Redemption 2 40−45
+4200%
1−2
−4200%
Valorant 75−80
+3650%
2−3
−3650%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5 55−60
+5800%
1−2
−5800%
Counter-Strike 2 23 0−1
Dota 2 25 0−1
Elden Ring 55−60
+5700%
1−2
−5700%
Far Cry 5 34
+3300%
1−2
−3300%
Fortnite 95−100
+4850%
2−3
−4850%
Forza Horizon 4 59
+5800%
1−2
−5800%
Grand Theft Auto V 25 0−1
Metro Exodus 29 0−1
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 120−130
+4133%
3−4
−4133%
Red Dead Redemption 2 40−45
+4200%
1−2
−4200%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 55−60
+5700%
1−2
−5700%
Valorant 75−80
+3650%
2−3
−3650%
World of Tanks 220−230
+3600%
6−7
−3600%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 55−60
+5800%
1−2
−5800%
Counter-Strike 2 30−35 0−1
Far Cry 5 60−65
+6300%
1−2
−6300%
Forza Horizon 4 46
+4500%
1−2
−4500%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 120−130
+4133%
3−4
−4133%
Valorant 75−80
+3650%
2−3
−3650%

1440p
High Preset

Dota 2 11 0−1
Elden Ring 30−33 0−1
Grand Theft Auto V 11 0−1
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 160−170
+4075%
4−5
−4075%
Red Dead Redemption 2 16−18 0−1
World of Tanks 120−130
+4133%
3−4
−4133%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 35−40
+3700%
1−2
−3700%
Counter-Strike 2 14−16 0−1
Far Cry 5 45−50
+4700%
1−2
−4700%
Forza Horizon 4 30 0−1
Metro Exodus 40−45
+4100%
1−2
−4100%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 24−27 0−1
Valorant 45−50
+4600%
1−2
−4600%

4K
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 14−16 0−1
Dota 2 9 0−1
Elden Ring 12−14 0−1
Grand Theft Auto V 9 0−1
Metro Exodus 12−14 0−1
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 55−60
+5400%
1−2
−5400%
Red Dead Redemption 2 12−14 0−1
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 9 0−1

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 18−20 0−1
Counter-Strike 2 14−16 0−1
Far Cry 5 24−27 0−1
Fortnite 21−24 0−1
Forza Horizon 4 15 0−1
Valorant 21−24 0−1

This is how Arc 8-Core iGPU and ATI HD 2600 PRO compete in popular games:

  • Arc 8-Core iGPU is 3500% faster in 1080p

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 18.53 0.55
Recency 14 December 2023 28 June 2007
Chip lithography 5 nm 65 nm

Arc 8-Core iGPU has a 3269.1% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 16 years, and a 1200% more advanced lithography process.

The Arc 8-Core iGPU is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon HD 2600 PRO in performance tests.

Be aware that Arc 8-Core iGPU is a notebook card while Radeon HD 2600 PRO is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU
Arc 8-Core iGPU
ATI Radeon HD 2600 PRO
Radeon HD 2600 PRO

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.2 50 votes

Rate Arc 8-Core iGPU on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.4 240 votes

Rate Radeon HD 2600 PRO on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.