ATI Radeon VE vs Apple M1 8-Core GPU

VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking3891545
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Architectureno dataRage 6 (2000−2007)
GPU code nameno dataRage 6
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date10 November 2020 (4 years ago)19 February 2001 (24 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores8no data
Core clock speed1278 MHz183 MHz
Number of transistorsno data30 million
Manufacturing process technology5 nm180 nm
Power consumption (TDP)no data23 Watt
Texture fill rateno data0.55
ROPsno data1
TMUsno data3

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Interfaceno dataAGP 4x
Widthno data1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeno dataDDR
Maximum RAM amountno data32 MB
Memory bus widthno data64 Bit
Memory clock speedno data183 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data2.928 GB/s
Shared memory+no data

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectorsno data1x DVI, 1x VGA, 1x S-Video

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectXno data7.0
OpenGLno data1.3
OpenCLno dataN/A
Vulkan-N/A

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD28no data

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Atomic Heart 30−35 no data
Counter-Strike 2 70−75 no data
Cyberpunk 2077 27−30 no data

Full HD
Medium Preset

Atomic Heart 30−35 no data
Battlefield 5 55−60 no data
Counter-Strike 2 70−75 no data
Cyberpunk 2077 27−30 no data
Far Cry 5 40−45 no data
Fortnite 70−75 no data
Forza Horizon 4 50−55 no data
Forza Horizon 5 40−45 no data
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 45−50 no data
Valorant 110−120 no data

Full HD
High Preset

Atomic Heart 30−35 no data
Battlefield 5 55−60 no data
Counter-Strike 2 70−75 no data
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 170−180 no data
Cyberpunk 2077 27−30 no data
Dota 2 85−90 no data
Far Cry 5 40−45 no data
Fortnite 70−75 no data
Forza Horizon 4 50−55 no data
Forza Horizon 5 40−45 no data
Grand Theft Auto V 45−50 no data
Metro Exodus 24−27 no data
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 45−50 no data
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 35−40 no data
Valorant 110−120 no data

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 55−60 no data
Cyberpunk 2077 27−30 no data
Dota 2 85−90 no data
Far Cry 5 40−45 no data
Forza Horizon 4 50−55 no data
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 45−50 no data
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 35−40 no data
Valorant 110−120 no data

Full HD
Epic Preset

Fortnite 70−75 no data

1440p
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 24−27 no data
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 95−100 no data
Grand Theft Auto V 20−22 no data
Metro Exodus 14−16 no data
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 100−110 no data
Valorant 130−140 no data

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 35−40 no data
Cyberpunk 2077 10−12 no data
Far Cry 5 27−30 no data
Forza Horizon 4 30−35 no data
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 21−24 no data

1440p
Epic Preset

Fortnite 27−30 no data

4K
High Preset

Atomic Heart 10−11 no data
Counter-Strike 2 8−9 no data
Grand Theft Auto V 24−27 no data
Metro Exodus 9−10 no data
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 16−18 no data
Valorant 70−75 no data

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 18−20 no data
Counter-Strike 2 8−9 no data
Cyberpunk 2077 5−6 no data
Dota 2 45−50 no data
Far Cry 5 12−14 no data
Forza Horizon 4 21−24 no data
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 12−14 no data

4K
Epic Preset

Fortnite 12−14 no data

Pros & cons summary


Recency 10 November 2020 19 February 2001
Chip lithography 5 nm 180 nm

Apple M1 8-Core GPU has an age advantage of 19 years, and a 3500% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between M1 8-Core GPU and Radeon VE. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Apple M1 8-Core GPU is a notebook card while Radeon VE is a desktop one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


Apple M1 8-Core GPU
M1 8-Core GPU
ATI Radeon VE
Radeon VE

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4 930 votes

Rate M1 8-Core GPU on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2 1 vote

Rate Radeon VE on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can give us your opinion about M1 8-Core GPU or Radeon VE, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.