Radeon PRO W7700 vs Apple M1 8-Core GPU

VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared M1 8-Core GPU with Radeon PRO W7700, including specs and performance data.

Apple M1 8-Core GPU
2020
13.53

PRO W7700 outperforms Apple M1 8-Core GPU by a whopping 332% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking38138
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data72.03
Power efficiencyno data21.45
Architectureno dataRDNA 3.0 (2022−2024)
GPU code nameno dataNavi 32
Market segmentLaptopWorkstation
Release date10 November 2020 (4 years ago)13 November 2023 (1 year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$999

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores83072
Core clock speed1278 MHz1900 MHz
Boost clock speedno data2600 MHz
Number of transistorsno data28,100 million
Manufacturing process technology5 nm5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)no data190 Watt
Texture fill rateno data499.2
Floating-point processing powerno data31.95 TFLOPS
ROPsno data96
TMUsno data192
Ray Tracing Coresno data48

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Interfaceno dataPCIe 4.0 x16
Lengthno data241 mm
Widthno data2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno data1x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeno dataGDDR6
Maximum RAM amountno data16 GB
Memory bus widthno data256 Bit
Memory clock speedno data2250 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data576.0 GB/s
Shared memory+-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectorsno data4x DisplayPort 2.1

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectXno data12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Modelno data6.7
OpenGLno data4.6
OpenCLno data2.2
Vulkan-1.3

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD27
−307%
110−120
+307%

Cost per frame, $

1080pno data9.08

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2 21−24
−313%
95−100
+313%
Cyberpunk 2077 27−30
−307%
110−120
+307%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5 45−50
−322%
190−200
+322%
Counter-Strike 2 21−24
−313%
95−100
+313%
Cyberpunk 2077 27−30
−307%
110−120
+307%
Forza Horizon 4 55−60
−318%
230−240
+318%
Forza Horizon 5 35−40
−317%
150−160
+317%
Metro Exodus 35−40
−321%
160−170
+321%
Red Dead Redemption 2 30−35
−312%
140−150
+312%
Valorant 55−60
−318%
230−240
+318%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5 45−50
−322%
190−200
+322%
Counter-Strike 2 21−24
−313%
95−100
+313%
Cyberpunk 2077 27−30
−307%
110−120
+307%
Dota 2 45−50
−329%
210−220
+329%
Far Cry 5 50−55
−331%
220−230
+331%
Fortnite 75−80
−290%
300−310
+290%
Forza Horizon 4 55−60
−318%
230−240
+318%
Forza Horizon 5 35−40
−317%
150−160
+317%
Grand Theft Auto V 45−50
−329%
210−220
+329%
Metro Exodus 35−40
−321%
160−170
+321%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 100−105
−300%
400−450
+300%
Red Dead Redemption 2 30−35
−312%
140−150
+312%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 40−45
−329%
180−190
+329%
Valorant 55−60
−318%
230−240
+318%
World of Tanks 180−190
−312%
750−800
+312%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 45−50
−322%
190−200
+322%
Counter-Strike 2 21−24
−313%
95−100
+313%
Cyberpunk 2077 27−30
−307%
110−120
+307%
Dota 2 45−50
−329%
210−220
+329%
Far Cry 5 50−55
−331%
220−230
+331%
Forza Horizon 4 55−60
−318%
230−240
+318%
Forza Horizon 5 35−40
−317%
150−160
+317%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 100−105
−300%
400−450
+300%
Valorant 55−60
−318%
230−240
+318%

1440p
High Preset

Dota 2 20−22
−325%
85−90
+325%
Grand Theft Auto V 20−22
−325%
85−90
+325%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 110−120
−327%
500−550
+327%
Red Dead Redemption 2 12−14
−317%
50−55
+317%
World of Tanks 95−100
−317%
400−450
+317%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 27−30
−307%
110−120
+307%
Cyberpunk 2077 10−11
−300%
40−45
+300%
Far Cry 5 30−35
−306%
130−140
+306%
Forza Horizon 4 30−35
−324%
140−150
+324%
Forza Horizon 5 21−24
−329%
90−95
+329%
Metro Exodus 27−30
−314%
120−130
+314%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 18−20
−317%
75−80
+317%
Valorant 30−35
−312%
140−150
+312%

4K
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 7−8
−329%
30−33
+329%
Dota 2 24−27
−317%
100−105
+317%
Grand Theft Auto V 24−27
−317%
100−105
+317%
Metro Exodus 9−10
−289%
35−40
+289%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 40−45
−325%
170−180
+325%
Red Dead Redemption 2 9−10
−289%
35−40
+289%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 24−27
−317%
100−105
+317%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 12−14
−323%
55−60
+323%
Counter-Strike 2 7−8
−329%
30−33
+329%
Cyberpunk 2077 4−5
−300%
16−18
+300%
Dota 2 24−27
−317%
100−105
+317%
Far Cry 5 16−18
−312%
70−75
+312%
Fortnite 14−16
−300%
60−65
+300%
Forza Horizon 4 18−20
−321%
80−85
+321%
Forza Horizon 5 10−11
−300%
40−45
+300%
Valorant 14−16
−300%
60−65
+300%

This is how Apple M1 8-Core GPU and PRO W7700 compete in popular games:

  • PRO W7700 is 307% faster in 1080p

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 13.53 58.44
Recency 10 November 2020 13 November 2023

PRO W7700 has a 331.9% higher aggregate performance score, and an age advantage of 3 years.

The Radeon PRO W7700 is our recommended choice as it beats the M1 8-Core GPU in performance tests.

Be aware that Apple M1 8-Core GPU is a notebook card while Radeon PRO W7700 is a workstation one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


Apple M1 8-Core GPU
M1 8-Core GPU
AMD Radeon PRO W7700
Radeon PRO W7700

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4 926 votes

Rate M1 8-Core GPU on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.8 4 votes

Rate Radeon PRO W7700 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.