GeForce GTX 950 vs Apple M1 8-Core GPU

M1 7-Core GPU M1 8-Core GPU M1 GPU M1 Max 24-Core GPU M1 Max 32-Core GPU M1 Pro 14-Core GPU M1 Pro 16-Core GPU
VS
GTX 750 GM206 GTX 750 v2 GTX 950 GTX 950 Low Power GTX 960 GTX 960 OEM

Aggregate performance score

We've compared M1 8-Core GPU with GeForce GTX 950, including specs and performance data.

Apple M1 8-Core GPU
2020
11.82

GTX 950 outperforms Apple M1 8-Core GPU by a minimal 1% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Contents

Apple M1 8-Core GPU M1 8-Core GPU
GTX 950 GTX 950

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking393387
Place by popularitynot in top-10090
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data7.60
Power efficiencyno data10.54
Architectureno dataMaxwell 2.0 (2014−2019)
GPU code nameno dataGM206
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date10 November 2020 (4 years ago)20 August 2015 (9 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$159

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the performance-to-price ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices for comparison.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores8768
Core clock speed1278 MHz1024 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1188 MHz
Number of transistorsno data2,940 million
Manufacturing process technology5 nm28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)no data90 Watt
Texture fill rateno data57.02
Floating-point processing powerno data1.825 TFLOPS
ROPsno data32
TMUsno data48

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Bus supportno dataPCI Express 3.0
Interfaceno dataPCIe 3.0 x16
Lengthno data202 mm
Heightno data4.376" (11.1 cm)
Widthno data2-slot
Recommended system power (PSU)no data350 Watt
Supplementary power connectorsno data1x 6-pin
SLI options-+

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeno dataGDDR5
Maximum RAM amountno data2 GB
Memory bus widthno data128 Bit
Memory clock speedno data6.6 GB/s
Memory bandwidthno data105.6 GB/s
Shared memory+-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectorsno dataDual Link DVI-I, HDMI 2.0, 3x DisplayPort 1.2
Multi monitor supportno data4 displays
HDMI-+
HDCP-+
Maximum VGA resolutionno data2048x1536
G-SYNC support-+
Audio input for HDMIno dataInternal

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

GameStream-+
GeForce ShadowPlay-+
GPU Boostno data2.0
GameWorks-+

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectXno data12 (12_1)
Shader Modelno data6.4
OpenGLno data4.5
OpenCLno data1.2
Vulkan-1.1.126
CUDA-+

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD28
−85.7%
52
+85.7%
4K21−24
−4.8%
22
+4.8%

Cost per frame, $

1080pno data3.06
4Kno data7.23

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Atomic Heart 30−35
−3.1%
30−35
+3.1%
Counter-Strike 2 70−75
−1.4%
70−75
+1.4%
Cyberpunk 2077 27−30
+0%
27−30
+0%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Atomic Heart 30−35
−3.1%
30−35
+3.1%
Battlefield 5 55−60
−1.8%
55−60
+1.8%
Counter-Strike 2 70−75
−1.4%
70−75
+1.4%
Cyberpunk 2077 27−30
+0%
27−30
+0%
Far Cry 5 40−45
+0%
40−45
+0%
Fortnite 70−75
−1.4%
75−80
+1.4%
Forza Horizon 4 50−55
−1.9%
55−60
+1.9%
Forza Horizon 5 40−45
−2.5%
40−45
+2.5%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 45−50
+0%
45−50
+0%
Valorant 110−120
−0.9%
110−120
+0.9%

Full HD
High Preset

Atomic Heart 30−35
−3.1%
30−35
+3.1%
Battlefield 5 55−60
−1.8%
55−60
+1.8%
Counter-Strike 2 70−75
−1.4%
70−75
+1.4%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 180−190
−0.6%
180−190
+0.6%
Cyberpunk 2077 27−30
+0%
27−30
+0%
Dota 2 85−90
+0%
85−90
+0%
Far Cry 5 40−45
+0%
40−45
+0%
Fortnite 70−75
−1.4%
75−80
+1.4%
Forza Horizon 4 50−55
−1.9%
55−60
+1.9%
Forza Horizon 5 40−45
−2.5%
40−45
+2.5%
Grand Theft Auto V 45−50
+32.4%
37
−32.4%
Metro Exodus 24−27
−3.8%
27−30
+3.8%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 45−50
+0%
45−50
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 35−40
−8.6%
38
+8.6%
Valorant 110−120
−0.9%
110−120
+0.9%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 55−60
−1.8%
55−60
+1.8%
Cyberpunk 2077 27−30
+0%
27−30
+0%
Dota 2 85−90
+0%
85−90
+0%
Far Cry 5 40−45
+0%
40−45
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 50−55
−1.9%
55−60
+1.9%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 45−50
+0%
45−50
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 35−40
+66.7%
21
−66.7%
Valorant 110−120
−0.9%
110−120
+0.9%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Fortnite 70−75
−1.4%
75−80
+1.4%

1440p
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 24−27
−4.2%
24−27
+4.2%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 95−100
−1%
95−100
+1%
Grand Theft Auto V 20−22
+0%
20−22
+0%
Metro Exodus 14−16
−6.7%
16−18
+6.7%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 110−120
−2.7%
110−120
+2.7%
Valorant 130−140
−1.5%
130−140
+1.5%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 35−40
−2.9%
35−40
+2.9%
Cyberpunk 2077 10−12
+0%
10−12
+0%
Far Cry 5 27−30
+0%
27−30
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 30−35
−3.2%
30−35
+3.2%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 20−22
+0%
20−22
+0%

1440p
Epic Preset

Fortnite 27−30
+0%
27−30
+0%

4K
High Preset

Atomic Heart 10−11
+0%
10−11
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 8−9
+0%
8−9
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 24−27
−16.7%
28
+16.7%
Metro Exodus 9−10
+0%
9−10
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 16−18
+30.8%
13
−30.8%
Valorant 70−75
+0%
70−75
+0%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 18−20
+0%
18−20
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 8−9
+0%
8−9
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 5−6
+0%
5−6
+0%
Dota 2 45−50
−2.2%
45−50
+2.2%
Far Cry 5 12−14
−7.7%
14−16
+7.7%
Forza Horizon 4 21−24
−4.5%
21−24
+4.5%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%

4K
Epic Preset

Fortnite 12−14
−8.3%
12−14
+8.3%

This is how Apple M1 8-Core GPU and GTX 950 compete in popular games:

  • GTX 950 is 86% faster in 1080p
  • GTX 950 is 5% faster in 4K

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt, with 1080p resolution and the Ultra Preset, the Apple M1 8-Core GPU is 67% faster.
  • in Grand Theft Auto V, with 4K resolution and the High Preset, the GTX 950 is 17% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • Apple M1 8-Core GPU is ahead in 3 tests (5%)
  • GTX 950 is ahead in 35 tests (56%)
  • there's a draw in 25 tests (40%)

Pros & cons summary

Performance score 11.82 11.96
Recency 10 November 2020 20 August 2015
Chip lithography 5 nm 28 nm

Apple M1 8-Core GPU has an age advantage of 5 years, and a 460% more advanced lithography process.

GTX 950, on the other hand, has a 1.2% higher aggregate performance score.

Given the minimal performance differences, no clear winner can be declared between M1 8-Core GPU and GeForce GTX 950.

Be aware that Apple M1 8-Core GPU is a notebook card while GeForce GTX 950 is a desktop one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.

Apple M1 8-Core GPU
M1 8-Core GPU
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950
GeForce GTX 950
Like
Like

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Apple M1 8-Core GPU M1 8 Core GPU
vs
RX Vega M GL / 870 Radeon RX Vega M GL / 870
GTX 950 GeForce GTX 950
vs
GTX 670 GeForce GTX 670
Apple M1 8-Core GPU M1 8 Core GPU
vs
GTX 1050 Ti Max-Q GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Max-Q
Apple M1 8-Core GPU Apple 8 Core GPU
vs
R9 380 380
Apple M1 8-Core GPU Apple 8 Core GPU
vs
GTX 960 960
Apple M1 8-Core GPU Apple 8 Core GPU
vs
GTX 1050 Ti 1050 Ti
Apple M1 8-Core GPU Apple 8 Core GPU
vs
GTX 680 680
Apple M1 8-Core GPU Apple 8 Core GPU
vs
HD 7970 7970
Apple M1 8-Core GPU Apple 8 Core GPU
vs
GTX 660 Ti 660 Ti
Apple M1 8-Core GPU Apple 8 Core GPU
vs
GTX 760 760
Apple M1 8-Core GPU Apple 8 Core GPU
vs
RX 460 460
Apple M1 8-Core GPU Apple 8 Core GPU
vs
HD 7870 7870
Apple M1 8-Core GPU Apple 8 Core GPU
vs
GTX 1050 1050

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.

4 930 votes

Rate M1 8-Core GPU on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4 2225 votes

Rate GeForce GTX 950 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about M1 8-Core GPU or GeForce GTX 950, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.