Ultra 7 265F vs Xeon W-10855M

VS

Primary details

Comparing Xeon W-10855M and Core Ultra 7 265F processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking936not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentMobile workstationDesktop processor
SeriesIntel Comet Lakeno data
Power efficiency16.74no data
Architecture codenameComet Lake-H (2020)Arrow Lake-S (2024−2025)
Release date13 May 2020 (4 years ago)January 2025

Detailed specifications

Xeon W-10855M and Core Ultra 7 265F basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores6 (Hexa-Core)20 (Icosa-Core)
Threads1220
Base clock speed2.8 GHz2.4 GHz
Boost clock speed4.9 GHz5.3 GHz
Bus rate8 GT/sno data
L1 cache384 KB112 KB (per core)
L2 cache1.5 MB3 MB (per core)
L3 cache12 MB30 MB (shared)
Chip lithography14 nm3 nm
Die sizeno data243 mm2
Maximum core temperature100 °Cno data
Number of transistorsno data17,800 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility+no data

Compatibility

Information on Xeon W-10855M and Core Ultra 7 265F compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketFCBGA14401851
Power consumption (TDP)45 Watt65 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon W-10855M and Core Ultra 7 265F. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2no data
AES-NI++
AVX++
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Speed Shift+no data
Hyper-Threading Technology+no data
TSX-+
Idle States+no data
Thermal Monitoring+-
Flex Memory Access+no data
SIPP+-
Turbo Boost Max 3.0+no data

Security technologies

Xeon W-10855M and Core Ultra 7 265F technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT++
EDB+no data
Secure Key+no data
Identity Protection+-
SGXYes with Intel® MEno data
OS Guard+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon W-10855M and Core Ultra 7 265F are enumerated here.

AMD-V+-
VT-d++
VT-x++
EPT+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon W-10855M and Core Ultra 7 265F. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4DDR5
Maximum memory size128 GBno data
Max memory channels2no data
Maximum memory bandwidth45.8 GB/sno data
ECC memory support+-

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardIntel® UHD Graphics for 10th Gen Intel® ProcessorsN/A
Quick Sync Video+-
Graphics max frequency1.2 GHzno data

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Xeon W-10855M and Core Ultra 7 265F integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supported3no data
eDP+no data
DisplayPort+-
HDMI+-
DVI+no data

Graphics image quality

Maximum display resolutions supported by Xeon W-10855M and Core Ultra 7 265F integrated GPUs, including resolutions over different interfaces.

4K resolution support+no data
Max resolution over HDMI 1.44096x2304@30Hzno data
Max resolution over eDP4096x2304@60Hzno data
Max resolution over DisplayPort4096x2304@60Hzno data

Graphics API support

APIs supported by Xeon W-10855M and Core Ultra 7 265F integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectX12no data
OpenGL4.5no data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon W-10855M and Core Ultra 7 265F.

PCIe version3.05.0
PCI Express lanes1620

Pros & cons summary


Physical cores 6 20
Threads 12 20
Chip lithography 14 nm 3 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 45 Watt 65 Watt

Xeon W-10855M has 44.4% lower power consumption.

Ultra 7 265F, on the other hand, has 233.3% more physical cores and 66.7% more threads, and a 366.7% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Xeon W-10855M and Core Ultra 7 265F. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Xeon W-10855M is a mobile workstation processor while Core Ultra 7 265F is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon W-10855M and Core Ultra 7 265F, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Xeon W-10855M
Xeon W-10855M
Intel Core Ultra 7 265F
Core Ultra 7 265F

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.5 67 votes

Rate Xeon W-10855M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate Core Ultra 7 265F on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Xeon W-10855M or Core Ultra 7 265F, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.