Ultra 9 285K vs Xeon W-10855M

VS

Aggregate performance score

Xeon W-10855M
2020
6 cores / 12 threads, 45 Watt
7.93
Core Ultra 9 285K
2024
24 cores / 24 threads, 125 Watt
42.98
+442%

Core Ultra 9 285K outperforms Xeon W-10855M by a whopping 442% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Xeon W-10855M and Core Ultra 9 285K processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking95354
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data74.24
Market segmentMobile workstationDesktop processor
SeriesIntel Comet Lakeno data
Power efficiency16.6832.54
Architecture codenameComet Lake-H (2020)Arrow Lake-S (2024−2025)
Release date13 May 2020 (4 years ago)24 October 2024 (less than a year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$589

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Xeon W-10855M and Core Ultra 9 285K basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores6 (Hexa-Core)24 (Tetracosa-Core)
Performance-coresno data8
Efficient-coresno data16
Threads1224
Base clock speed2.8 GHz3.7 GHz
Boost clock speed4.9 GHz5.6 GHz
Bus rate8 GT/s250 MHz
L1 cache384 KB112 KB (per core)
L2 cache1.5 MB3 MB (per core)
L3 cache12 MB36 MB (shared)
Chip lithography14 nm3 nm
Die sizeno data243 mm2
Maximum core temperature100 °Cno data
Number of transistorsno data17,800 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility+no data
Unlocked multiplier-+

Compatibility

Information on Xeon W-10855M and Core Ultra 9 285K compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketFCBGA1440FCLGA1851
Power consumption (TDP)45 Watt125 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon W-10855M and Core Ultra 9 285K. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2Intel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2
AES-NI++
AVX++
vProno data+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Speed Shift++
Turbo Boost Technologyno data2.0
Hyper-Threading Technology+no data
TSX-+
Idle States++
Thermal Monitoring++
Flex Memory Access+no data
SIPP++
Turbo Boost Max 3.0++
Deep Learning Boost-+
Supported AI Software Frameworks-OpenVINO™, WindowsML, DirectML, ONNX RT, WebNN

Security technologies

Xeon W-10855M and Core Ultra 9 285K technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT++
EDB++
Secure Key++
Identity Protection+-
SGXYes with Intel® MEno data
OS Guard++

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon W-10855M and Core Ultra 9 285K are enumerated here.

AMD-V+-
VT-d++
VT-x++
EPT++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon W-10855M and Core Ultra 9 285K. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4DDR5-6400
Maximum memory size128 GB192 GB
Max memory channels22
Maximum memory bandwidth45.8 GB/sno data
ECC memory support++

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardIntel UHD Graphics for 10th Gen Intel ProcessorsIntel® Graphics
Quick Sync Video++
Graphics max frequency1.2 GHz2 GHz

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Xeon W-10855M and Core Ultra 9 285K integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supported34
eDP+no data
DisplayPort+-
HDMI+-
DVI+no data

Graphics image quality

Maximum display resolutions supported by Xeon W-10855M and Core Ultra 9 285K integrated GPUs, including resolutions over different interfaces.

4K resolution support+no data
Max resolution over HDMI 1.44096x2304@30Hz4K @ 60Hz (HDMI 2.1 TMDS) 8K @ 60Hz (HDMI2.1 FRL)
Max resolution over eDP4096x2304@60Hz4K @ 60Hz
Max resolution over DisplayPort4096x2304@60Hz8K @ 60Hz

Graphics API support

APIs supported by Xeon W-10855M and Core Ultra 9 285K integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectX1212
OpenGL4.54.5

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon W-10855M and Core Ultra 9 285K.

PCIe version3.05.0 and 4.0
PCI Express lanes1620

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Xeon W-10855M 7.93
Ultra 9 285K 42.98
+442%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Xeon W-10855M 12591
Ultra 9 285K 68271
+442%

Geekbench 5.5 Multi-Core

Xeon W-10855M 6231
Ultra 9 285K 25963
+317%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 7.93 42.98
Recency 13 May 2020 24 October 2024
Physical cores 6 24
Threads 12 24
Chip lithography 14 nm 3 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 45 Watt 125 Watt

Xeon W-10855M has 177.8% lower power consumption.

Ultra 9 285K, on the other hand, has a 442% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 4 years, 300% more physical cores and 100% more threads, and a 366.7% more advanced lithography process.

The Core Ultra 9 285K is our recommended choice as it beats the Xeon W-10855M in performance tests.

Be aware that Xeon W-10855M is a mobile workstation processor while Core Ultra 9 285K is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon W-10855M and Core Ultra 9 285K, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Xeon W-10855M
Xeon W-10855M
Intel Core Ultra 9 285K
Core Ultra 9 285K

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.5 68 votes

Rate Xeon W-10855M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.4 178 votes

Rate Core Ultra 9 285K on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Xeon W-10855M or Core Ultra 9 285K, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.