Ultra 5 245K vs Xeon W-10885M

VS

Aggregate performance score

Xeon W-10885M
2020
8 cores / 16 threads, 45 Watt
9.91
Core Ultra 5 245K
2024
14 cores / 14 threads, 125 Watt
27.50
+177%

Core Ultra 5 245K outperforms Xeon W-10885M by a whopping 177% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Xeon W-10885M and Core Ultra 5 245K processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking776174
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data77.74
Market segmentMobile workstationDesktop processor
SeriesComet Lakeno data
Power efficiency20.8420.82
Architecture codenameComet Lake-H (2020)Arrow Lake-S (2024−2025)
Release date13 May 2020 (4 years ago)24 October 2024 (less than a year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$309

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Xeon W-10885M and Core Ultra 5 245K basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores8 (Octa-Core)14 (Tetradeca-Core)
Threads1614
Base clock speed2.4 GHz4.2 GHz
Boost clock speed5.1 GHz5.2 GHz
Bus rate8 GT/s159 MHz
L1 cache512 KB112 KB (per core)
L2 cache2 MB3 MB (per core)
L3 cache16 MB24 MB (shared)
Chip lithography14 nm3 nm
Die sizeno data243 mm2
Maximum core temperature100 °Cno data
Number of transistorsno data17,800 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility+no data
Unlocked multiplier-+

Compatibility

Information on Xeon W-10885M and Core Ultra 5 245K compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketFCBGA14401851
Power consumption (TDP)45 Watt125 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon W-10885M and Core Ultra 5 245K. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2no data
AES-NI++
AVX++
vProno data+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Speed Shift+no data
Hyper-Threading Technology+no data
TSX-+
Idle States+no data
Thermal Monitoring+-
Flex Memory Access+no data
SIPP++
Turbo Boost Max 3.0+no data

Security technologies

Xeon W-10885M and Core Ultra 5 245K technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT++
EDB+no data
Secure Key+no data
Identity Protection+-
SGXYes with Intel® MEno data
OS Guard+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon W-10885M and Core Ultra 5 245K are enumerated here.

AMD-V+-
VT-d++
VT-x++
EPT+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon W-10885M and Core Ultra 5 245K. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4DDR5
Maximum memory size128 GBno data
Max memory channels2no data
Maximum memory bandwidth45.8 GB/sno data
ECC memory support+-

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardIntel UHD Graphics for 10th Gen Intel ProcessorsArc Xe-LPG Graphics 64EU
Quick Sync Video+-
Graphics max frequency1.25 GHzno data

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Xeon W-10885M and Core Ultra 5 245K integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supported3no data
eDP+no data
DisplayPort+-
HDMI+-
DVI+no data

Graphics image quality

Maximum display resolutions supported by Xeon W-10885M and Core Ultra 5 245K integrated GPUs, including resolutions over different interfaces.

4K resolution support+no data
Max resolution over HDMI 1.44096x2304@30Hzno data
Max resolution over eDP4096x2304@60Hzno data
Max resolution over DisplayPort4096x2304@60Hzno data

Graphics API support

APIs supported by Xeon W-10885M and Core Ultra 5 245K integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectX12no data
OpenGL4.5no data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon W-10885M and Core Ultra 5 245K.

PCIe version3.05.0
PCI Express lanes1620

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Xeon W-10885M 9.91
Ultra 5 245K 27.50
+177%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Xeon W-10885M 15748
Ultra 5 245K 43682
+177%

Geekbench 5.5 Multi-Core

Xeon W-10885M 8378
Ultra 5 245K 17760
+112%

Blender(-)

Xeon W-10885M 286
+110%
Ultra 5 245K 136

Geekbench 5.5 Single-Core

Xeon W-10885M 1340
Ultra 5 245K 2224
+66%

7-Zip Single

Xeon W-10885M 5507
Ultra 5 245K 6477
+17.6%

7-Zip

Xeon W-10885M 45696
Ultra 5 245K 77921
+70.5%

WebXPRT 3

Xeon W-10885M 229
Ultra 5 245K 346
+51.1%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 9.91 27.50
Recency 13 May 2020 24 October 2024
Physical cores 8 14
Threads 16 14
Chip lithography 14 nm 3 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 45 Watt 125 Watt

Xeon W-10885M has 14.3% more threads, and 177.8% lower power consumption.

Ultra 5 245K, on the other hand, has a 177.5% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 4 years, 75% more physical cores, and a 366.7% more advanced lithography process.

The Core Ultra 5 245K is our recommended choice as it beats the Xeon W-10885M in performance tests.

Be aware that Xeon W-10885M is a mobile workstation processor while Core Ultra 5 245K is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon W-10885M and Core Ultra 5 245K, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Xeon W-10885M
Xeon W-10885M
Intel Core Ultra 5 245K
Core Ultra 5 245K

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.3 44 votes

Rate Xeon W-10885M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.3 20 votes

Rate Core Ultra 5 245K on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Xeon W-10885M or Core Ultra 5 245K, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.