EPYC 7643P vs Xeon Platinum 8368Q

VS

Aggregate performance score

Xeon Platinum 8368Q
2021
38 cores / 76 threads, 270 Watt
29.39
EPYC 7643P
2023
48 cores / 96 threads, 225 Watt
43.23
+47.1%

EPYC 7643P outperforms Xeon Platinum 8368Q by a considerable 47% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Xeon Platinum 8368Q and EPYC 7643P processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking14850
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data13.71
Market segmentServerServer
Power efficiency10.3018.18
Architecture codenameIce Lake-SP (2021)Milan (2021−2023)
Release date6 April 2021 (3 years ago)5 September 2023 (1 year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$2,722

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Xeon Platinum 8368Q and EPYC 7643P basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores3848 (Octatetraconta-Core)
Threads7696
Base clock speed2.6 GHz2.3 GHz
Boost clock speed3.7 GHz3.6 GHz
L1 cache64K (per core)64 KB (per core)
L2 cache1 MB (per core)512 KB (per core)
L3 cache57 MB (shared)256 MB (shared)
Chip lithography10 nm7 nm
Die sizeno data8x 81 mm2
Maximum case temperature (TCase)85 °Cno data
Number of transistorsno data33,200 million
64 bit support+-
Windows 11 compatibility+no data

Compatibility

Information on Xeon Platinum 8368Q and EPYC 7643P compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration21
SocketFCLGA4189SP3
Power consumption (TDP)270 Watt225 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon Platinum 8368Q and EPYC 7643P. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX, Intel® AVX2, Intel® AVX-512no data
AES-NI++
AVX++
vPro+no data
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
Speed Shift+no data
Turbo Boost Technology2.0no data
Hyper-Threading Technology+no data
TSX+-
Precision Boost 2no data+
Deep Learning Boost+-

Security technologies

Xeon Platinum 8368Q and EPYC 7643P technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT+no data
EDB+no data
SGXYes with Intel® SPSno data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon Platinum 8368Q and EPYC 7643P are enumerated here.

AMD-V-+
VT-d+no data
VT-x+no data
EPT+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon Platinum 8368Q and EPYC 7643P. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4-3200DDR4
Maximum memory size6 TBno data
Max memory channels8no data
ECC memory support+-

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataN/A

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon Platinum 8368Q and EPYC 7643P.

PCIe version4.04.0
PCI Express lanes64128

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Xeon Platinum 8368Q 29.39
EPYC 7643P 43.23
+47.1%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Xeon Platinum 8368Q 46681
EPYC 7643P 68675
+47.1%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 29.39 43.23
Recency 6 April 2021 5 September 2023
Physical cores 38 48
Threads 76 96
Chip lithography 10 nm 7 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 270 Watt 225 Watt

EPYC 7643P has a 47.1% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 2 years, 26.3% more physical cores and 26.3% more threads, a 42.9% more advanced lithography process, and 20% lower power consumption.

The EPYC 7643P is our recommended choice as it beats the Xeon Platinum 8368Q in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon Platinum 8368Q and EPYC 7643P, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Xeon Platinum 8368Q
Xeon Platinum 8368Q
AMD EPYC 7643P
EPYC 7643P

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.3 4 votes

Rate Xeon Platinum 8368Q on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate EPYC 7643P on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Xeon Platinum 8368Q or EPYC 7643P, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.