EPYC 7573X vs Xeon Platinum 8368

VS

Aggregate performance score

Xeon Platinum 8368
2021
38 cores / 76 threads, 270 Watt
57.95
+32.6%
EPYC 7573X
2022
32 cores / 64 threads, 280 Watt
43.71

Xeon Platinum 8368 outperforms EPYC 7573X by a substantial 33% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Xeon Platinum 8368 and EPYC 7573X processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking1949
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentServerServer
Power efficiency20.3114.77
Architecture codenameIce Lake-SP (2021)Milan-X (2022)
Release date6 April 2021 (3 years ago)22 March 2022 (2 years ago)

Detailed specifications

Xeon Platinum 8368 and EPYC 7573X basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores3832 (Dotriaconta-Core)
Threads7664
Base clock speed2.4 GHz2.8 GHz
Boost clock speed3.4 GHz3.6 GHz
L1 cache64K (per core)64K (per core)
L2 cache1 MB (per core)512K (per core)
L3 cache57 MB (shared)768 MB (shared)
Chip lithography10 nm7 nm
Die sizeno data8x 81 mm2
Maximum case temperature (TCase)83 °Cno data
Number of transistorsno data33,200 million
64 bit support+-
Windows 11 compatibility+no data

Compatibility

Information on Xeon Platinum 8368 and EPYC 7573X compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration21
SocketFCLGA4189SP3
Power consumption (TDP)270 Watt280 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon Platinum 8368 and EPYC 7573X. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX, Intel® AVX2, Intel® AVX-512no data
AES-NI++
AVX++
vPro+no data
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
Speed Shift+no data
Turbo Boost Technology2.0no data
Hyper-Threading Technology+no data
TSX+-
Precision Boost 2no data+
Deep Learning Boost+-

Security technologies

Xeon Platinum 8368 and EPYC 7573X technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT+no data
EDB+no data
SGXYes with Intel® SPSno data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon Platinum 8368 and EPYC 7573X are enumerated here.

AMD-V-+
VT-d+no data
VT-x+no data
EPT+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon Platinum 8368 and EPYC 7573X. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4-3200DDR4-3200
Maximum memory size6 TBno data
Max memory channels8no data
ECC memory support+-

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon Platinum 8368 and EPYC 7573X.

PCIe version4.04.0
PCI Express lanes64128

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Xeon Platinum 8368 57.95
+32.6%
EPYC 7573X 43.71

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Xeon Platinum 8368 92054
+32.6%
EPYC 7573X 69432

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 57.95 43.71
Recency 6 April 2021 22 March 2022
Physical cores 38 32
Threads 76 64
Chip lithography 10 nm 7 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 270 Watt 280 Watt

Xeon Platinum 8368 has a 32.6% higher aggregate performance score, 18.8% more physical cores and 18.8% more threads, and 3.7% lower power consumption.

EPYC 7573X, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 11 months, and a 42.9% more advanced lithography process.

The Xeon Platinum 8368 is our recommended choice as it beats the EPYC 7573X in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon Platinum 8368 and EPYC 7573X, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Xeon Platinum 8368
Xeon Platinum 8368
AMD EPYC 7573X
EPYC 7573X

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.7 100 votes

Rate Xeon Platinum 8368 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate EPYC 7573X on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Xeon Platinum 8368 or EPYC 7573X, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.