Ryzen 7 7735U vs Xeon E5-4617

VS

Aggregate performance score

Xeon E5-4617
2012
6 cores / 6 threads, 130 Watt
4.04
Ryzen 7 7735U
2023
8 cores / 16 threads, 28 Watt
13.58
+236%

Ryzen 7 7735U outperforms Xeon E5-4617 by a whopping 236% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Xeon E5-4617 and Ryzen 7 7735U processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking1424555
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation0.17no data
Market segmentServerLaptop
Power efficiency2.8945.05
Architecture codenameSandy Bridge-EP (2012)Rembrandt-U Refresh (2023)
Release date14 May 2012 (12 years ago)4 January 2023 (1 year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$90no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Xeon E5-4617 and Ryzen 7 7735U basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores6 (Hexa-Core)8 (Octa-Core)
Threads616
Base clock speed2.9 GHz2.7 GHz
Boost clock speed3.4 GHz4.75 GHz
Bus rate7.2 GT/sno data
L1 cache64 KB (per core)64K (per core)
L2 cache256 KB (per core)512K (per core)
L3 cache15360 KB (shared)16 MB (shared)
Chip lithography32 nm6 nm
Die size435 mm2208 mm2
Maximum core temperatureno data95 °C
Number of transistors2,270 millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-+

Compatibility

Information on Xeon E5-4617 and Ryzen 7 7735U compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration41
SocketFCLGA2011FP7
Power consumption (TDP)130 Watt28 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon E5-4617 and Ryzen 7 7735U. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® AVXMMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4A, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX, AVX2, BMI2, ABM, FMA, ADX, SMEP, SMAP, SMT, CPB, AES-NI, RDRAND, RDSEED, SHA, SME
AES-NI++
FMA-+
AVX++
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
Turbo Boost Technology2.0no data
Hyper-Threading Technology+no data
Idle States+no data
Thermal Monitoring+-
Flex Memory Access-no data
Demand Based Switching+no data
Precision Boost 2no data+

Security technologies

Xeon E5-4617 and Ryzen 7 7735U technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT+no data
EDB+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon E5-4617 and Ryzen 7 7735U are enumerated here.

AMD-V-+
VT-d+no data
VT-x+no data
EPT+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon E5-4617 and Ryzen 7 7735U. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR5
Maximum memory size384 GBno data
Max memory channels4no data
Maximum memory bandwidth51.2 GB/sno data
ECC memory support+-

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataAMD Radeon 680M

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon E5-4617 and Ryzen 7 7735U.

PCIe version3.04.0
PCI Express lanes4020

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Xeon E5-4617 4.04
Ryzen 7 7735U 13.58
+236%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Xeon E5-4617 6298
Ryzen 7 7735U 21169
+236%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 4.04 13.58
Recency 14 May 2012 4 January 2023
Physical cores 6 8
Threads 6 16
Chip lithography 32 nm 6 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 130 Watt 28 Watt

Ryzen 7 7735U has a 236.1% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 10 years, 33.3% more physical cores and 166.7% more threads, a 433.3% more advanced lithography process, and 364.3% lower power consumption.

The Ryzen 7 7735U is our recommended choice as it beats the Xeon E5-4617 in performance tests.

Be aware that Xeon E5-4617 is a server/workstation processor while Ryzen 7 7735U is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon E5-4617 and Ryzen 7 7735U, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Xeon E5-4617
Xeon E5-4617
AMD Ryzen 7 7735U
Ryzen 7 7735U

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


2.9 7 votes

Rate Xeon E5-4617 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.3 103 votes

Rate Ryzen 7 7735U on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Xeon E5-4617 or Ryzen 7 7735U, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.