Xeon E5-4617 vs E5-2640

VS

Aggregate performance score

Xeon E5-2640
2012
6 cores / 12 threads, 95 Watt
4.04
Xeon E5-4617
2012
6 cores / 6 threads, 130 Watt
4.04

Primary details

Comparing Xeon E5-2640 and Xeon E5-4617 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking14251424
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation3.710.17
Market segmentServerServer
Power efficiency3.952.89
Architecture codenameSandy Bridge-EP (2012)Sandy Bridge-EP (2012)
Release date6 March 2012 (12 years ago)14 May 2012 (12 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$162$90

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

Xeon E5-2640 has 2082% better value for money than Xeon E5-4617.

Detailed specifications

Xeon E5-2640 and Xeon E5-4617 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores6 (Hexa-Core)6 (Hexa-Core)
Threads126
Base clock speed2.5 GHz2.9 GHz
Boost clock speed3 GHz3.4 GHz
Bus rate7.2 GT/s7.2 GT/s
L1 cache64 KB (per core)64 KB (per core)
L2 cache256 KB (per core)256 KB (per core)
L3 cache15360 KB (shared)15360 KB (shared)
Chip lithography32 nm32 nm
Die size435 mm2435 mm2
Maximum core temperature73 °Cno data
Number of transistors2,270 million2,270 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--

Compatibility

Information on Xeon E5-2640 and Xeon E5-4617 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration24
SocketFCLGA2011FCLGA2011
Power consumption (TDP)95 Watt130 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon E5-2640 and Xeon E5-4617. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® AVXIntel® AVX
AES-NI++
AVX++
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Turbo Boost Technology1.02.0
Hyper-Threading Technology++
Idle States++
Thermal Monitoring++
Flex Memory Access--
Demand Based Switching++

Security technologies

Xeon E5-2640 and Xeon E5-4617 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT++
EDB++

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon E5-2640 and Xeon E5-4617 are enumerated here.

VT-d++
VT-x++
EPT++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon E5-2640 and Xeon E5-4617. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR3
Maximum memory size384 GB384 GB
Max memory channels44
Maximum memory bandwidth42.6 GB/s51.2 GB/s
ECC memory support++

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon E5-2640 and Xeon E5-4617.

PCIe version3.03.0
PCI Express lanes4040

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Xeon E5-2640 4.04
Xeon E5-4617 4.04

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Xeon E5-2640 6294
Xeon E5-4617 6298
+0.1%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Recency 6 March 2012 14 May 2012
Threads 12 6
Power consumption (TDP) 95 Watt 130 Watt

Xeon E5-2640 has 100% more threads, and 36.8% lower power consumption.

Xeon E5-4617, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 2 months.

Given the minimal performance differences, no clear winner can be declared between Xeon E5-2640 and Xeon E5-4617.


Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon E5-2640 and Xeon E5-4617, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Xeon E5-2640
Xeon E5-2640
Intel Xeon E5-4617
Xeon E5-4617

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.2 1094 votes

Rate Xeon E5-2640 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.9 7 votes

Rate Xeon E5-4617 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Xeon E5-2640 or Xeon E5-4617, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.