Xeon D-2896TER vs Apple M1 Pro
Primary details
Comparing Apple M1 Pro and Xeon D-2896TER processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | 711 | not rated |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Market segment | Laptop | Server |
| Series | Apple M-Series | no data |
| Release date | 18 October 2021 (3 years ago) | 1 October 2023 (1 year ago) |
Detailed specifications
Apple M1 Pro and Xeon D-2896TER basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 10 (Deca-Core) | 20 (Icosa-Core) |
| Threads | 10 | 40 |
| Base clock speed | 2.064 GHz | 2 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 3.22 GHz | 3.2 GHz |
| L1 cache | 2.9 MB | no data |
| L2 cache | 28 MB | no data |
| L3 cache | 24 MB | 30 MB |
| Chip lithography | 5 nm | no data |
| Number of transistors | 33700 Million | no data |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
Compatibility
Information on Apple M1 Pro and Xeon D-2896TER compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Socket | no data | FCBGA2579 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 2064 ‑ 3220 Watt | 110 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Apple M1 Pro and Xeon D-2896TER. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| Instruction set extensions | no data | Intel® AVX-512 |
| AES-NI | - | + |
| Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | no data | + |
| QuickAssist | no data | - |
| Turbo Boost Technology | no data | 2.0 |
| Hyper-Threading Technology | no data | + |
| Thermal Monitoring | - | + |
| Deep Learning Boost | - | + |
Security technologies
Apple M1 Pro and Xeon D-2896TER technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
| TXT | no data | + |
| EDB | no data | + |
| SGX | no data | Yes with Intel® SPS |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Apple M1 Pro and Xeon D-2896TER are enumerated here.
| VT-d | no data | + |
| VT-x | no data | + |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Apple M1 Pro and Xeon D-2896TER. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | no data | DDR4 |
| Maximum memory size | no data | 1 TB |
| Max memory channels | no data | 4 |
| ECC memory support | - | + |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | Apple M1 Pro 16-Core GPU | no data |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Apple M1 Pro and Xeon D-2896TER.
| PCIe version | no data | 4.0 |
| PCI Express lanes | no data | 32 |
| USB revision | no data | 3.0 |
| Max number of SATA 6 Gb/s Ports | no data | 24 |
| Number of USB ports | no data | 4 |
| Integrated LAN | no data | + |
Pros & cons summary
| Recency | 18 October 2021 | 1 October 2023 |
| Physical cores | 10 | 20 |
| Threads | 10 | 40 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 2064 Watt | 110 Watt |
Xeon D-2896TER has an age advantage of 1 year, 100% more physical cores and 300% more threads, and 1776.4% lower power consumption.
We couldn't decide between Apple M1 Pro and Xeon D-2896TER. We've got no test results to judge.
Be aware that Apple M1 Pro is a notebook processor while Xeon D-2896TER is a server/workstation one.
Should you still have questions on choice between Apple M1 Pro and Xeon D-2896TER, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.
