Duron 1000 vs Xeon 3.0
Primary details
Comparing Xeon 3.0 and Duron 1000 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
Place in the ranking | not rated | not rated |
Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
Market segment | Server | Desktop processor |
Series | no data | AMD Duron |
Architecture codename | Irwindale (2004) | K7 (2000−2004) |
Release date | June 2004 (20 years ago) | 17 December 2001 (22 years ago) |
Detailed specifications
Xeon 3.0 and Duron 1000 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
Physical cores | 1 (Single-Core) | 1 (Single-Core) |
Threads | 1 | 1 |
Boost clock speed | 3 GHz | 1 GHz |
Bus type | no data | FSB |
Bus rate | no data | 200 MT/s |
Multiplier | no data | 10 |
L1 cache | 16 KB | no data |
L2 cache | 2 MB | 64 KB |
L3 cache | 0 KB | no data |
Chip lithography | 90 nm | 180 nm |
Die size | 169 mm2 | 105.68 mm2 |
Number of transistors | 178 million | 25 Million |
64 bit support | + | - |
Windows 11 compatibility | - | - |
Compatibility
Information on Xeon 3.0 and Duron 1000 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | 1 (Uniprocessor) |
Socket | 604 | no data |
Power consumption (TDP) | 135 Watt | 25 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon 3.0 and Duron 1000. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | + | no data |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon 3.0 and Duron 1000. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
Maximum memory size | no data | 4 GB |
Pros & cons summary
Chip lithography | 90 nm | 180 nm |
Power consumption (TDP) | 135 Watt | 25 Watt |
Xeon 3.0 has a 100% more advanced lithography process.
Duron 1000, on the other hand, has 440% lower power consumption.
We couldn't decide between Xeon 3.0 and Duron 1000. We've got no test results to judge.
Be aware that Xeon 3.0 is a server/workstation processor while Duron 1000 is a desktop one.
Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon 3.0 and Duron 1000, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.