E-300 vs V-Series V140

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

V-Series V140
2010
1 core / 1 thread, 25 Watt
0.27
+28.6%

V-Series V140 outperforms E-300 by a significant 29% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing V-Series V140 and E-300 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking31253199
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
SeriesAMD V-SeriesAMD E-Series
Power efficiency1.021.10
Architecture codenameChamplain (2010−2011)Zacate (2011−2013)
Release date4 October 2010 (14 years ago)22 August 2011 (13 years ago)

Detailed specifications

V-Series V140 and E-300 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores1 (Single-Core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads12
Boost clock speed2.3 GHz1.3 GHz
Bus rate3200 MHzno data
L1 cache128 KB64K (per core)
L2 cache512 KB512K (per core)
L3 cacheno data0 KB
Chip lithography45 nm40 nm
Die sizeno data75 mm2
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--

Compatibility

Information on V-Series V140 and E-300 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configurationno data1
SocketS1FT1
Power consumption (TDP)25 Watt18 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by V-Series V140 and E-300. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsMMX, 3DNow, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSE4A, AMD64, Enhanced Virus Protection, VirtualizationMMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4A, SVM
VirusProtect+-

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by V-Series V140 and E-300 are enumerated here.

AMD-V++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by V-Series V140 and E-300. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR3

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataAMD Radeon HD 6310

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

V-Series V140 0.27
+28.6%
E-300 0.21

Cinebench 10 32-bit single-core

Cinebench R10 is an ancient ray tracing benchmark for processors by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. Its single core version uses just one CPU thread to render a futuristic looking motorcycle.

V-Series V140 1913
+124%
E-300 853

3DMark06 CPU

3DMark06 is a discontinued DirectX 9 benchmark suite from Futuremark. Its CPU part contains two scenarios, one dedicated to artificial intelligence pathfinding, another to game physics using PhysX package.

V-Series V140 990
+18%
E-300 839

wPrime 32

wPrime 32M is a math multi-thread processor test, which calculates square roots of first 32 million integer numbers. Its result is measured in seconds, so that the less is benchmark result, the faster the processor.

V-Series V140 68.3
+15.7%
E-300 79

Cinebench 11.5 64-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 11.5 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R11.5 which uses all the processor threads. A maximum of 64 threads is supported in this version.

V-Series V140 1
+25%
E-300 0

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.27 0.21
Recency 4 October 2010 22 August 2011
Physical cores 1 2
Threads 1 2
Chip lithography 45 nm 40 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 25 Watt 18 Watt

V-Series V140 has a 28.6% higher aggregate performance score.

E-300, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 10 months, 100% more physical cores and 100% more threads, a 12.5% more advanced lithography process, and 38.9% lower power consumption.

The V-Series V140 is our recommended choice as it beats the E-300 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between V-Series V140 and E-300, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD V-Series V140
V-Series V140
AMD E-300
E-300

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


2.6 37 votes

Rate V-Series V140 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.4 303 votes

Rate E-300 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about V-Series V140 or E-300, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.