i7-13705H vs Turion II Neo K625
Aggregate performance score
Core i7-13705H outperforms Turion II Neo K625 by a whopping 3721% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Primary details
Comparing Turion II Neo K625 and Core i7-13705H processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
Place in the ranking | 3009 | 469 |
Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
Market segment | Laptop | Laptop |
Series | AMD Turion II Neo | no data |
Power efficiency | 2.46 | 31.34 |
Architecture codename | Geneva (2010) | Raptor Lake-H (2023) |
Release date | 12 May 2010 (14 years ago) | 4 January 2023 (1 year ago) |
Launch price (MSRP) | no data | $502 |
Detailed specifications
Turion II Neo K625 and Core i7-13705H basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
Physical cores | 2 (Dual-core) | 14 (Tetradeca-Core) |
Threads | 2 | 20 |
Base clock speed | no data | 2.4 GHz |
Boost clock speed | 1.5 GHz | 5 GHz |
Bus rate | 3200 MHz | no data |
L1 cache | no data | 80K (per core) |
L2 cache | 1 MB | 2 MB (per core) |
L3 cache | no data | 24 MB (shared) |
Chip lithography | 45 nm | Intel 7 nm |
Die size | no data | 257 mm2 |
Maximum core temperature | no data | 100 °C |
Maximum case temperature (TCase) | no data | 72 °C |
64 bit support | + | + |
Windows 11 compatibility | - | + |
Compatibility
Information on Turion II Neo K625 and Core i7-13705H compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
Number of CPUs in a configuration | no data | 1 |
Socket | S1 | FCBGA1792 |
Power consumption (TDP) | 15 Watt | 45 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Turion II Neo K625 and Core i7-13705H. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
Instruction set extensions | no data | Intel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2 |
AES-NI | - | + |
AVX | - | + |
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | no data | + |
Speed Shift | no data | + |
Hyper-Threading Technology | no data | + |
TSX | - | + |
Thermal Monitoring | - | + |
Flex Memory Access | no data | + |
Turbo Boost Max 3.0 | no data | + |
Deep Learning Boost | - | + |
Security technologies
Turion II Neo K625 and Core i7-13705H technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
TXT | no data | + |
OS Guard | no data | + |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Turion II Neo K625 and Core i7-13705H are enumerated here.
VT-d | no data | + |
VT-x | no data | + |
EPT | no data | + |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Turion II Neo K625 and Core i7-13705H. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
Supported memory types | no data | DDR5-5200, DDR4-3200, LPDDR4x-4267 |
Maximum memory size | no data | 64 GB |
Max memory channels | no data | 2 |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
Integrated graphics card | no data | Intel® Iris® Xe Graphics eligible |
Quick Sync Video | - | + |
Graphics max frequency | no data | 1.5 GHz |
Execution Units | no data | 96 |
Graphics interfaces
Available interfaces and connections of Turion II Neo K625 and Core i7-13705H integrated GPUs.
Number of displays supported | no data | 4 |
Graphics image quality
Maximum display resolutions supported by Turion II Neo K625 and Core i7-13705H integrated GPUs, including resolutions over different interfaces.
Max resolution over HDMI 1.4 | no data | 4096 x 2304 @ 60Hz |
Max resolution over eDP | no data | 4096 x 2304 @ 120Hz |
Max resolution over DisplayPort | no data | 7680 x 4320 @ 60Hz |
Graphics API support
APIs supported by Turion II Neo K625 and Core i7-13705H integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.
DirectX | no data | 12.1 |
OpenGL | no data | 4.6 |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Turion II Neo K625 and Core i7-13705H.
PCIe version | no data | 5.0 |
PCI Express lanes | no data | 8 |
Synthetic benchmark performance
Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.
Combined synthetic benchmark score
This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.
Passmark
Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.
Cinebench 10 32-bit single-core
Cinebench R10 is an ancient ray tracing benchmark for processors by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. Its single core version uses just one CPU thread to render a futuristic looking motorcycle.
Cinebench 10 32-bit multi-core
Cinebench Release 10 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R10 using all the processor threads. Possible number of threads is limited by 16 in this version.
wPrime 32
wPrime 32M is a math multi-thread processor test, which calculates square roots of first 32 million integer numbers. Its result is measured in seconds, so that the less is benchmark result, the faster the processor.
Cinebench 11.5 64-bit multi-core
Cinebench Release 11.5 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R11.5 which uses all the processor threads. A maximum of 64 threads is supported in this version.
Pros & cons summary
Performance score | 0.39 | 14.90 |
Recency | 12 May 2010 | 4 January 2023 |
Physical cores | 2 | 14 |
Threads | 2 | 20 |
Power consumption (TDP) | 15 Watt | 45 Watt |
Turion II Neo K625 has 200% lower power consumption.
i7-13705H, on the other hand, has a 3720.5% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 12 years, and 600% more physical cores and 900% more threads.
The Core i7-13705H is our recommended choice as it beats the Turion II Neo K625 in performance tests.
Should you still have questions on choice between Turion II Neo K625 and Core i7-13705H, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.