C-70 vs Mobile Pentium 4 532
Aggregate performance score
Mobile Pentium 4 532 outperforms C-70 by a significant 20% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Primary details
Comparing Mobile Pentium 4 532 and C-70 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
Place in the ranking | 3165 | 3222 |
Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
Market segment | Laptop | Laptop |
Series | Mobile Pentium 4 | AMD C-Series |
Power efficiency | 0.26 | 2.10 |
Architecture codename | Prescott (2001−2005) | Ontario (2011−2012) |
Release date | no data (2024 years ago) | 1 September 2012 (12 years ago) |
Detailed specifications
Mobile Pentium 4 532 and C-70 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
Physical cores | 1 (Single-Core) | 2 (Dual-core) |
Threads | 1 | 2 |
Base clock speed | no data | 1 GHz |
Boost clock speed | 3.06 GHz | 1.33 GHz |
Bus rate | 533 MHz | no data |
L1 cache | no data | 64K (per core) |
L2 cache | no data | 512K (per core) |
L3 cache | no data | 0 KB |
Chip lithography | 90 nm | 40 nm |
Die size | no data | 75 mm2 |
64 bit support | - | + |
Windows 11 compatibility | - | - |
Compatibility
Information on Mobile Pentium 4 532 and C-70 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
Number of CPUs in a configuration | no data | 1 |
Socket | no data | FT1 BGA 413-Ball |
Power consumption (TDP) | 88 Watt | 9 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Mobile Pentium 4 532 and C-70. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
Instruction set extensions | no data | MMX(+), SSE(1,2,3,3S,4A), AMD-V, Radeon HD 6290 (276-400 MHz) |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Mobile Pentium 4 532 and C-70 are enumerated here.
AMD-V | - | + |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Mobile Pentium 4 532 and C-70. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
Supported memory types | no data | DDR3 Single-channel |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
Integrated graphics card | no data | AMD Radeon HD 6290 (280 - 400 MHz) |
Synthetic benchmark performance
Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.
Combined synthetic benchmark score
This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.
3DMark06 CPU
3DMark06 is a discontinued DirectX 9 benchmark suite from Futuremark. Its CPU part contains two scenarios, one dedicated to artificial intelligence pathfinding, another to game physics using PhysX package.
Pros & cons summary
Performance score | 0.24 | 0.20 |
Physical cores | 1 | 2 |
Threads | 1 | 2 |
Chip lithography | 90 nm | 40 nm |
Power consumption (TDP) | 88 Watt | 9 Watt |
Mobile Pentium 4 532 has a 20% higher aggregate performance score.
C-70, on the other hand, has 100% more physical cores and 100% more threads, a 125% more advanced lithography process, and 877.8% lower power consumption.
The Mobile Pentium 4 532 is our recommended choice as it beats the C-70 in performance tests.
Should you still have questions on choice between Mobile Pentium 4 532 and C-70, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.