A9-9425 vs Athlon X2 QL-65

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

Comparing Athlon X2 QL-65 and A9-9425 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the rankingnot rated2007
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Series2x AMD AthlonAMD Bristol Ridge
Power efficiencyno data10.92
Architecture codenameLion (2008−2009)Stoney Ridge (2016−2019)
Release date1 September 2009 (15 years ago)31 May 2016 (8 years ago)

Detailed specifications

Athlon X2 QL-65 and A9-9425 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads22
Base clock speedno data3.1 GHz
Boost clock speed2.1 GHz3.7 GHz
Bus rate3600 MHzno data
L1 cache256 KB128K (per core)
L2 cache1 MB1 MB (per core)
L3 cache0 KBno data
Chip lithography65 nm28 nm
Die sizeno data124.5 mm2
Maximum core temperature100 °C90 °C
Maximum case temperature (TCase)no data74 °C
Number of transistorsno data1,200 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--

Compatibility

Information on Athlon X2 QL-65 and A9-9425 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketS1g2FT4
Power consumption (TDP)35 Watt15 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Athlon X2 QL-65 and A9-9425. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensions65 nm, 1.075 - 1.125MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4A, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX, AVX2, BMI2, ABM, TBM, FMA4, XOP, SMEP, CPB, AES-NI, RDRAND
AES-NI-+
FMA-+
AVX-+
PowerNow+-

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Athlon X2 QL-65 and A9-9425 are enumerated here.

AMD-V++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Athlon X2 QL-65 and A9-9425. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesno dataDDR4

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataAMD Radeon R5 (Stoney Ridge)

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Athlon X2 QL-65 609
A9-9425 1511
+148%

Cinebench 10 32-bit single-core

Cinebench R10 is an ancient ray tracing benchmark for processors by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. Its single core version uses just one CPU thread to render a futuristic looking motorcycle.

Athlon X2 QL-65 1630
A9-9425 2686
+64.8%

Cinebench 10 32-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 10 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R10 using all the processor threads. Possible number of threads is limited by 16 in this version.

Athlon X2 QL-65 3213
A9-9425 4338
+35%

3DMark06 CPU

3DMark06 is a discontinued DirectX 9 benchmark suite from Futuremark. Its CPU part contains two scenarios, one dedicated to artificial intelligence pathfinding, another to game physics using PhysX package.

Athlon X2 QL-65 1489
A9-9425 2314
+55.4%

wPrime 32

wPrime 32M is a math multi-thread processor test, which calculates square roots of first 32 million integer numbers. Its result is measured in seconds, so that the less is benchmark result, the faster the processor.

Athlon X2 QL-65 39
A9-9425 25.83
+51%

Pros & cons summary


Recency 1 September 2009 31 May 2016
Chip lithography 65 nm 28 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 35 Watt 15 Watt

A9-9425 has an age advantage of 6 years, a 132.1% more advanced lithography process, and 133.3% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Athlon X2 QL-65 and A9-9425. We've got no test results to judge.


Should you still have questions on choice between Athlon X2 QL-65 and A9-9425, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD Athlon X2 QL-65
Athlon X2 QL-65
AMD A9-9425
A9-9425

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


1.4 127 votes

Rate Athlon X2 QL-65 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.5 1516 votes

Rate A9-9425 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Athlon X2 QL-65 or A9-9425, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.