Celeron M 420 vs Turion 64 ML-28

VS

Primary details

Comparing Turion 64 ML-28 and Celeron M 420 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the rankingnot ratednot rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
SeriesTurion 64Celeron M
Architecture codenameLancaster (2005−2006)Yonah (2005−2006)
Release dateJune 2005 (19 years ago)no data (2024 years ago)

Detailed specifications

Turion 64 ML-28 and Celeron M 420 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores1 (Single-Core)1 (Single-Core)
Threads11
Base clock speedno data1.6 GHz
Boost clock speed1.6 GHz1.6 GHz
Bus rate800 MHz533 MHz
L1 cache128 KBno data
L2 cache512 KBno data
L3 cache0 KB1 MB L2 KB
Chip lithography90 nm65 nm
Die size125 mm2no data
Maximum core temperatureno data100 °C
Number of transistors114 millionno data
64 bit support+-
Windows 11 compatibility--
VID voltage rangeno data1.0V-1.3V

Compatibility

Information on Turion 64 ML-28 and Celeron M 420 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1no data
Socket754PPGA478
Power consumption (TDP)35 Watt27 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Turion 64 ML-28 and Celeron M 420. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

PowerNow+-
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)no data-
Turbo Boost Technologyno data-
Hyper-Threading Technologyno data-
Idle Statesno data-
Demand Based Switchingno data-
FSB parityno data-

Security technologies

Turion 64 ML-28 and Celeron M 420 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXTno data-
EDBno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Turion 64 ML-28 and Celeron M 420 are enumerated here.

VT-xno data-

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.



Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Turion 64 ML-28 254
+82.7%
Celeron M 420 139

Cinebench 10 32-bit single-core

Cinebench R10 is an ancient ray tracing benchmark for processors by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. Its single core version uses just one CPU thread to render a futuristic looking motorcycle.

Turion 64 ML-28 1201
Celeron M 420 1277
+6.3%

Pros & cons summary


Chip lithography 90 nm 65 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 35 Watt 27 Watt

Celeron M 420 has a 38.5% more advanced lithography process, and 29.6% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Turion 64 ML-28 and Celeron M 420. We've got no test results to judge.


Should you still have questions on choice between Turion 64 ML-28 and Celeron M 420, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD Turion 64 ML-28
Turion 64 ML-28
Intel Celeron M 420
Celeron M 420

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3 2 votes

Rate Turion 64 ML-28 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.2 80 votes

Rate Celeron M 420 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Turion 64 ML-28 or Celeron M 420, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.