Ryzen 3 PRO 3300U vs Celeron M 380

Primary details

Comparing Celeron M 380 and Ryzen 3 PRO 3300U processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the rankingnot rated1470
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
SeriesCeleron MAMD Ryzen 3
Power efficiencyno data23.65
Architecture codenameDothan (2004−2005)Picasso (2019−2022)
Release dateno data (2024 years ago)8 April 2019 (5 years ago)

Detailed specifications

Celeron M 380 and Ryzen 3 PRO 3300U basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores1 (Single-Core)4 (Quad-Core)
Threads14
Base clock speed1.6 GHz2.1 GHz
Boost clock speed1.6 GHz3.5 GHz
Bus typeno dataPCIe 3.0
Bus rate400 MHzno data
Multiplierno data21
L1 cacheno data384 KB
L2 cacheno data2 MB
L3 cache1 MB L2 KB4 MB (shared)
Chip lithography90 nm12 nm
Die sizeno data209.78 mm2
Maximum core temperature100 °Cno data
Number of transistorsno data4940 Million
64 bit support-+
Windows 11 compatibility-+
VID voltage range1.004V-1.292Vno data

Compatibility

Information on Celeron M 380 and Ryzen 3 PRO 3300U compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configurationno data1 (Uniprocessor)
SocketPPGA478, H-PBGA479FP5
Power consumption (TDP)21 Watt15 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Celeron M 380 and Ryzen 3 PRO 3300U. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsno dataXFR, FMA3, SSE 4.2, AVX2, SMT
AES-NI-+
AVX-+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)-no data
Turbo Boost Technology-no data
Hyper-Threading Technology-no data
Idle States-no data
Demand Based Switching-no data
PAE32 Bitno data
FSB parity-no data

Security technologies

Celeron M 380 and Ryzen 3 PRO 3300U technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT-no data
EDB+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Celeron M 380 and Ryzen 3 PRO 3300U are enumerated here.

AMD-V-+
VT-x-no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Celeron M 380 and Ryzen 3 PRO 3300U. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesno dataDDR4 Dual-channel
Maximum memory sizeno data32 GB
Maximum memory bandwidthno data38.397 GB/s

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataAMD Radeon RX Vega 6 (Ryzen 2000/3000)

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Celeron M 380 and Ryzen 3 PRO 3300U.

PCIe versionno data3.0
PCI Express lanesno data12

Pros & cons summary


Physical cores 1 4
Threads 1 4
Chip lithography 90 nm 12 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 21 Watt 15 Watt

Ryzen 3 PRO 3300U has 300% more physical cores and 300% more threads, a 650% more advanced lithography process, and 40% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Celeron M 380 and Ryzen 3 PRO 3300U. We've got no test results to judge.


Should you still have questions on choice between Celeron M 380 and Ryzen 3 PRO 3300U, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Celeron M 380
Celeron M 380
AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 3300U
Ryzen 3 PRO 3300U

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.6 9 votes

Rate Celeron M 380 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.6 28 votes

Rate Ryzen 3 PRO 3300U on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Celeron M 380 or Ryzen 3 PRO 3300U, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.