Microsoft SQ1 vs Sempron 145
Primary details
Comparing Sempron 145 and Microsoft SQ1 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | not rated | 1484 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Market segment | Desktop processor | Laptop |
| Series | no data | Qualcomm Snapdragon |
| Power efficiency | no data | 0.12 |
| Architecture codename | Sargas (2009−2011) | Cortex-A76 / A55 (Kryo 495) (2019) |
| Release date | 1 September 2010 (14 years ago) | 2 October 2019 (5 years ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $95 | no data |
Detailed specifications
Sempron 145 and Microsoft SQ1 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 1 (Single-Core) | 8 (Octa-Core) |
| Threads | 1 | 8 |
| Base clock speed | 2.8 GHz | no data |
| Boost clock speed | 2.8 GHz | 3 GHz |
| L1 cache | 128 KB (per core) | no data |
| L2 cache | 1 MB (per core) | no data |
| L3 cache | 0 KB | 2 MB |
| Chip lithography | 45 nm | 7 nm |
| Die size | 117 mm2 | no data |
| Number of transistors | 234 million | no data |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | - |
Compatibility
Information on Sempron 145 and Microsoft SQ1 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | no data |
| Socket | AM3 | no data |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 45 Watt | 3000 Watt |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Sempron 145 and Microsoft SQ1. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR3 | no data |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | no data | Qualcomm Adreno 685 |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Sempron 145 and Microsoft SQ1.
| PCIe version | 2.0 | no data |
Synthetic benchmark performance
Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.
Passmark
Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.
Pros & cons summary
| Recency | 1 September 2010 | 2 October 2019 |
| Physical cores | 1 | 8 |
| Threads | 1 | 8 |
| Chip lithography | 45 nm | 7 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 45 Watt | 3000 Watt |
Sempron 145 has 6566.7% lower power consumption.
Microsoft SQ1, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 9 years, 700% more physical cores and 700% more threads, and a 542.9% more advanced lithography process.
We couldn't decide between Sempron 145 and Microsoft SQ1. We've got no test results to judge.
Note that Sempron 145 is a desktop processor while Microsoft SQ1 is a notebook one.
Should you still have questions on choice between Sempron 145 and Microsoft SQ1, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.
