Ryzen 7 PRO 3700 vs Ryzen Threadripper 1950

Aggregate performance score

Ryzen Threadripper 1950
2017
16 cores / 32 threads, 180 Watt
13.90
Ryzen 7 PRO 3700
2019
8 cores / 16 threads, 65 Watt
14.42
+3.7%

Ryzen 7 PRO 3700 outperforms Ryzen Threadripper 1950 by a minimal 4% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Ryzen Threadripper 1950 and Ryzen 7 PRO 3700 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking526496
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentDesktop processorDesktop processor
Seriesno dataAMD Ryzen 7
Power efficiency7.3120.99
Architecture codenameZen (2017−2020)Matisse (2019−2020)
Release date29 July 2017 (7 years ago)30 September 2019 (5 years ago)

Detailed specifications

Ryzen Threadripper 1950 and Ryzen 7 PRO 3700 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores16 (Hexadeca-Core)8 (Octa-Core)
Threads3216
Base clock speed3.2 GHz3.6 GHz
Boost clock speed3.2 GHz4.4 GHz
L1 cache96K (per core)64 KB (per core)
L2 cache512 KB (per core)512 KB (per core)
L3 cache32 MB32 MB
Chip lithography14 nm7 nm
Die size213 mm274 mm2
Maximum case temperature (TCase)no data95 °C
Number of transistors9,600 million3,800 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-+
Unlocked multiplier++

Compatibility

Information on Ryzen Threadripper 1950 and Ryzen 7 PRO 3700 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11 (Uniprocessor)
SocketSP3r2AM4
Power consumption (TDP)180 Watt65 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Ryzen Threadripper 1950 and Ryzen 7 PRO 3700. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI++
AVX++
Precision Boost 2no data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Ryzen Threadripper 1950 and Ryzen 7 PRO 3700 are enumerated here.

AMD-V++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Ryzen Threadripper 1950 and Ryzen 7 PRO 3700. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4 Quad-channelDDR4-3200
Maximum memory sizeno data128 GB
Max memory channelsno data2
Maximum memory bandwidthno data51.196 GB/s

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataN/A

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Ryzen Threadripper 1950 and Ryzen 7 PRO 3700.

PCIe versionno data4.0
PCI Express lanesno data24

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Ryzen Threadripper 1950 13.90
Ryzen 7 PRO 3700 14.42
+3.7%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Ryzen Threadripper 1950 22077
Ryzen 7 PRO 3700 22899
+3.7%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 13.90 14.42
Recency 29 July 2017 30 September 2019
Physical cores 16 8
Threads 32 16
Chip lithography 14 nm 7 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 180 Watt 65 Watt

Ryzen Threadripper 1950 has 100% more physical cores and 100% more threads.

Ryzen 7 PRO 3700, on the other hand, has a 3.7% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 2 years, a 100% more advanced lithography process, and 176.9% lower power consumption.

Given the minimal performance differences, no clear winner can be declared between Ryzen Threadripper 1950 and Ryzen 7 PRO 3700.


Should you still have questions on choice between Ryzen Threadripper 1950 and Ryzen 7 PRO 3700, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1950
Ryzen Threadripper 1950
AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 3700
Ryzen 7 PRO 3700

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.4 20 votes

Rate Ryzen Threadripper 1950 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.4 401 vote

Rate Ryzen 7 PRO 3700 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Ryzen Threadripper 1950 or Ryzen 7 PRO 3700, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.