i9-11900F vs Ryzen Threadripper 1950

Aggregate performance score

Ryzen Threadripper 1950
2017
16 cores / 32 threads, 180 Watt
14.43
Core i9-11900F
2021
8 cores / 16 threads, 65 Watt
14.56
+0.9%

Core i9-11900F outperforms Ryzen Threadripper 1950 by a minimal 1% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Ryzen Threadripper 1950 and Core i9-11900F processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking522515
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentDesktop processorDesktop processor
Power efficiency7.3120.43
Architecture codenameZen (2017−2020)Rocket Lake (2021)
Release date29 July 2017 (7 years ago)16 March 2021 (3 years ago)

Detailed specifications

Ryzen Threadripper 1950 and Core i9-11900F basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores16 (Hexadeca-Core)8 (Octa-Core)
Threads3216
Base clock speed3.2 GHz2.5 GHz
Boost clock speed3.2 GHz5.1 GHz
Bus rateno data8 GT/s
L1 cache96K (per core)64K (per core)
L2 cache512 KB (per core)256K (per core)
L3 cache32 MB16 MB (shared)
Chip lithography14 nm14 nm
Die size213 mm2no data
Maximum core temperatureno data100 °C
Maximum case temperature (TCase)no data72 °C
Number of transistors9,600 millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-+
Unlocked multiplier+-

Compatibility

Information on Ryzen Threadripper 1950 and Core i9-11900F compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketSP3r2FCLGA1200
Power consumption (TDP)180 Watt65 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Ryzen Threadripper 1950 and Core i9-11900F. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsno dataIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2, Intel® AVX-512
AES-NI++
AVX++
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)no data+
Turbo Boost Technologyno data2.0
Hyper-Threading Technologyno data+
TSX-+
Idle Statesno data+
Thermal Monitoring-+
Turbo Boost Max 3.0no data+
Deep Learning Boost-+

Security technologies

Ryzen Threadripper 1950 and Core i9-11900F technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXTno data+
EDBno data+
Secure Keyno data+
Identity Protection-+
SGXno data-
OS Guardno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Ryzen Threadripper 1950 and Core i9-11900F are enumerated here.

AMD-V+-
VT-dno data+
VT-xno data+
EPTno data+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Ryzen Threadripper 1950 and Core i9-11900F. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4 Quad-channelDDR4-3200
Maximum memory sizeno data128 GB
Max memory channelsno data2
Maximum memory bandwidthno data50 GB/s

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Ryzen Threadripper 1950 and Core i9-11900F.

PCIe versionno data4.0
PCI Express lanesno data20

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Ryzen Threadripper 1950 14.43
i9-11900F 14.56
+0.9%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Ryzen Threadripper 1950 22077
i9-11900F 22281
+0.9%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 14.43 14.56
Recency 29 July 2017 16 March 2021
Physical cores 16 8
Threads 32 16
Power consumption (TDP) 180 Watt 65 Watt

Ryzen Threadripper 1950 has 100% more physical cores and 100% more threads.

i9-11900F, on the other hand, has a 0.9% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 3 years, and 176.9% lower power consumption.

Given the minimal performance differences, no clear winner can be declared between Ryzen Threadripper 1950 and Core i9-11900F.


Should you still have questions on choice between Ryzen Threadripper 1950 and Core i9-11900F, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1950
Ryzen Threadripper 1950
Intel Core i9-11900F
Core i9-11900F

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.4 20 votes

Rate Ryzen Threadripper 1950 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.9 296 votes

Rate Core i9-11900F on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Ryzen Threadripper 1950 or Core i9-11900F, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.