Xeon Phi 3120A vs Ryzen Threadripper 1940X
Primary details
Comparing Ryzen Threadripper 1940X and Xeon Phi 3120A processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | not rated | not rated |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Market segment | Desktop processor | Server |
| Architecture codename | Zen (2017−2020) | Knights Corner (2012−2014) |
| Release date | 29 July 2017 (7 years ago) | 17 June 2013 (11 years ago) |
Detailed specifications
Ryzen Threadripper 1940X and Xeon Phi 3120A basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 14 (Tetradeca-Core) | 57 (Heptapentaconta-Core) |
| Threads | 28 | 228 |
| Base clock speed | 3.5 GHz | no data |
| Boost clock speed | 4 GHz | 1.1 GHz |
| L1 cache | 96K (per core) | 32 KB (per core) |
| L2 cache | 512 KB (per core) | 512 KB (per core) |
| L3 cache | 32 MB | 0 KB (shared) |
| Chip lithography | 14 nm | 22 nm |
| Die size | 213 mm2 | 350 mm2 |
| Number of transistors | 9,600 million | 5,000 million |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | - |
| Unlocked multiplier | + | - |
Compatibility
Information on Ryzen Threadripper 1940X and Xeon Phi 3120A compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | 1 |
| Socket | SP3r2 | PCIe x16 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 180 Watt | 300 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Ryzen Threadripper 1940X and Xeon Phi 3120A. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| AES-NI | + | + |
| AVX | + | + |
| vPro | no data | + |
| Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | no data | + |
Security technologies
Ryzen Threadripper 1940X and Xeon Phi 3120A technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
| TXT | no data | + |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Ryzen Threadripper 1940X and Xeon Phi 3120A are enumerated here.
| AMD-V | + | - |
| VT-d | no data | + |
| VT-x | no data | + |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Ryzen Threadripper 1940X and Xeon Phi 3120A. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR4 Quad-channel | DDR3, DDR4 |
Pros & cons summary
| Recency | 29 July 2017 | 17 June 2013 |
| Physical cores | 14 | 57 |
| Threads | 28 | 228 |
| Chip lithography | 14 nm | 22 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 180 Watt | 300 Watt |
Ryzen Threadripper 1940X has an age advantage of 4 years, a 57.1% more advanced lithography process, and 66.7% lower power consumption.
Xeon Phi 3120A, on the other hand, has 307.1% more physical cores and 714.3% more threads.
We couldn't decide between Ryzen Threadripper 1940X and Xeon Phi 3120A. We've got no test results to judge.
Note that Ryzen Threadripper 1940X is a desktop processor while Xeon Phi 3120A is a server/workstation one.
Should you still have questions on choice between Ryzen Threadripper 1940X and Xeon Phi 3120A, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.
