Ultra 7 258V vs Ryzen Threadripper 1950

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Ryzen Threadripper 1950
2017
16 cores / 32 threads, 180 Watt
13.90
+10.8%
Core Ultra 7 258V
2024
8 cores / 8 threads, 17 Watt
12.55

Ryzen Threadripper 1950 outperforms Core Ultra 7 258V by a moderate 11% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Ryzen Threadripper 1950 and Core Ultra 7 258V processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking535619
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentDesktop processorLaptop
Power efficiency7.3169.86
Architecture codenameZen (2017−2020)Lunar Lake (2024)
Release date29 July 2017 (7 years ago)24 September 2024 (less than a year ago)

Detailed specifications

Ryzen Threadripper 1950 and Core Ultra 7 258V basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores16 (Hexadeca-Core)8 (Octa-Core)
Threads328
Base clock speed3.2 GHz2.2 GHz
Boost clock speed3.2 GHz4.8 GHz
Bus rateno data37 MHz
L1 cache96K (per core)192 KB (per core)
L2 cache512 KB (per core)2.5 MB (per core)
L3 cache32 MB12 MB (shared)
Chip lithography14 nm3 nm
Die size213 mm2no data
Maximum core temperatureno data100 °C
Number of transistors9,600 millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-no data
Unlocked multiplier+-

Compatibility

Information on Ryzen Threadripper 1950 and Core Ultra 7 258V compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketSP3r2Intel BGA 2833
Power consumption (TDP)180 Watt17 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Ryzen Threadripper 1950 and Core Ultra 7 258V. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI++
AVX++
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)no data+
TSX-+

Security technologies

Ryzen Threadripper 1950 and Core Ultra 7 258V technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXTno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Ryzen Threadripper 1950 and Core Ultra 7 258V are enumerated here.

AMD-V+-
VT-dno data+
VT-xno data+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Ryzen Threadripper 1950 and Core Ultra 7 258V. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4 Quad-channelDDR5

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataArc 140V

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Ryzen Threadripper 1950 and Core Ultra 7 258V.

PCIe versionno data5.0
PCI Express lanesno data4

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Ryzen Threadripper 1950 13.90
+10.8%
Ultra 7 258V 12.55

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Ryzen Threadripper 1950 22077
+10.7%
Ultra 7 258V 19937

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 13.90 12.55
Recency 29 July 2017 24 September 2024
Physical cores 16 8
Threads 32 8
Chip lithography 14 nm 3 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 180 Watt 17 Watt

Ryzen Threadripper 1950 has a 10.8% higher aggregate performance score, and 100% more physical cores and 300% more threads.

Ultra 7 258V, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 7 years, a 366.7% more advanced lithography process, and 958.8% lower power consumption.

The Ryzen Threadripper 1950 is our recommended choice as it beats the Core Ultra 7 258V in performance tests.

Note that Ryzen Threadripper 1950 is a desktop processor while Core Ultra 7 258V is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Ryzen Threadripper 1950 and Core Ultra 7 258V, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1950
Ryzen Threadripper 1950
Intel Core Ultra 7 258V
Core Ultra 7 258V

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.4 20 votes

Rate Ryzen Threadripper 1950 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.9 14 votes

Rate Core Ultra 7 258V on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Ryzen Threadripper 1950 or Core Ultra 7 258V, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.