Celeron N5105 vs Ryzen Embedded V1605B

VS

Aggregate performance score

Ryzen Embedded V1605B
2018
4 cores / 8 threads, 15 Watt
4.20
+64.7%
Celeron N5105
2021
4 cores / 4 threads, 10 Watt
2.55

Ryzen Embedded V1605B outperforms Celeron N5105 by an impressive 65% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Ryzen Embedded V1605B and Celeron N5105 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking13771737
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentDesktop processorDesktop processor
SeriesAMD Ryzen Embeddedno data
Power efficiency26.5024.13
Architecture codenameZen (2017−2020)Jasper Lake (2021)
Release date21 February 2018 (6 years ago)11 January 2021 (3 years ago)

Detailed specifications

Ryzen Embedded V1605B and Celeron N5105 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)4 (Quad-Core)
Threads84
Base clock speed2 GHz2 GHz
Boost clock speed3.6 GHz2.9 GHz
Multiplier20no data
L1 cache128K (per core)no data
L2 cache512K (per core)1.5 MB
L3 cache2 MB (shared)4 MB
Chip lithography14 nm10 nm
Die size210 mm2no data
Maximum core temperature105 °C105 °C
Number of transistors4,950 millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-+

Compatibility

Information on Ryzen Embedded V1605B and Celeron N5105 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1 (Uniprocessor)1
SocketFP5FCBGA1338
Power consumption (TDP)15 Watt10 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Ryzen Embedded V1605B and Celeron N5105. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsXFR, FMA3, SSE 4.2, AVX2, SMTIntel® SSE4.2
AES-NI++
AVX+-
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)no data+
Speed Shiftno data+
Turbo Boost Technologyno data-
Hyper-Threading Technologyno data-
Idle Statesno data+
Thermal Monitoring-+
Smart Responseno data-
GPIOno data+
Turbo Boost Max 3.0no data-
Precision Boost 2+no data

Security technologies

Ryzen Embedded V1605B and Celeron N5105 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXTno data-
Identity Protection-+
SGXno data-
OS Guardno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Ryzen Embedded V1605B and Celeron N5105 are enumerated here.

AMD-V+-
VT-dno data+
VT-xno data+
EPTno data+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Ryzen Embedded V1605B and Celeron N5105. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4 Dual-channelDDR4
Maximum memory size32 GB16 GB
Max memory channels22
Maximum memory bandwidth38.397 GB/sno data
ECC memory support+-

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics card
Compare
AMD Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 2000/3000) ( - 1100 MHz)Intel UHD Graphics
Quick Sync Video-+
Graphics max frequencyno data800 MHz
Execution Unitsno data24

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Ryzen Embedded V1605B and Celeron N5105 integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supportedno data3
eDPno data+
DisplayPort-+
HDMI-+
MIPI-DSIno data+

Graphics image quality

Maximum display resolutions supported by Ryzen Embedded V1605B and Celeron N5105 integrated GPUs, including resolutions over different interfaces.

4K resolution supportno data+
Max resolution over HDMI 1.4no data4096x2160@60Hz
Max resolution over eDPno data4096x2160@60Hz
Max resolution over DisplayPortno data4096x2160@60Hz

Graphics API support

APIs supported by Ryzen Embedded V1605B and Celeron N5105 integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectXno data12
OpenGLno data4.5

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Ryzen Embedded V1605B and Celeron N5105.

PCI Express lanesno data8
USB revisionno data2.0/3.2
Max number of SATA 6 Gb/s Portsno data2
Number of USB portsno data14
Integrated LANno data-
UARTno data+

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Ryzen Embedded V1605B 4.20
+64.7%
Celeron N5105 2.55

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Ryzen Embedded V1605B 6677
+64.7%
Celeron N5105 4053

Cinebench 15 64-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 15 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R15 which uses all the processor threads.

Ryzen Embedded V1605B 654
+77.7%
Celeron N5105 368

Cinebench 15 64-bit single-core

Cinebench R15 (standing for Release 15) is a benchmark made by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. It was superseded by later versions of Cinebench, which use more modern variants of Cinema 4D engine. The Single Core version (sometimes called Single-Thread) only uses a single processor thread to render a room full of reflective spheres and light sources.

Ryzen Embedded V1605B 128
+18.4%
Celeron N5105 108

Geekbench 5.5 Multi-Core

Ryzen Embedded V1605B 3184
+53.1%
Celeron N5105 2080

Blender(-)

Ryzen Embedded V1605B 791
Celeron N5105 1573
+98.9%

Geekbench 5.5 Single-Core

Ryzen Embedded V1605B 819
+25.4%
Celeron N5105 653

7-Zip Single

Ryzen Embedded V1605B 3374
+8.6%
Celeron N5105 3108

7-Zip

Ryzen Embedded V1605B 16708
+49.8%
Celeron N5105 11153

WebXPRT 3

Ryzen Embedded V1605B 149
+11%
Celeron N5105 134

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 4.20 2.55
Integrated graphics card 4.50 5.58
Recency 21 February 2018 11 January 2021
Threads 8 4
Chip lithography 14 nm 10 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 15 Watt 10 Watt

Ryzen Embedded V1605B has a 64.7% higher aggregate performance score, and 100% more threads.

Celeron N5105, on the other hand, has 24% faster integrated GPU, an age advantage of 2 years, a 40% more advanced lithography process, and 50% lower power consumption.

The Ryzen Embedded V1605B is our recommended choice as it beats the Celeron N5105 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Ryzen Embedded V1605B and Celeron N5105, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD Ryzen Embedded V1605B
Ryzen Embedded V1605B
Intel Celeron N5105
Celeron N5105

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.4 21 vote

Rate Ryzen Embedded V1605B on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.7 696 votes

Rate Celeron N5105 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Ryzen Embedded V1605B or Celeron N5105, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.