Celeron N5095 vs N5105

VS

Aggregate performance score

Celeron N5105
2021
4 cores / 4 threads, 10 Watt
2.60
Celeron N5095
2021
4 cores / 4 threads, 15 Watt
2.62
+0.8%

Celeron N5095 outperforms Celeron N5105 by a minimal 1% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Celeron N5105 and Celeron N5095 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking17341728
Place by popularitynot in top-10030
Market segmentDesktop processorDesktop processor
Seriesno dataIntel Jasper Lake
Power efficiency24.1516.22
Architecture codenameJasper Lake (2021)Jasper Lake (2021)
Release date11 January 2021 (3 years ago)11 January 2021 (3 years ago)

Detailed specifications

Celeron N5105 and Celeron N5095 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)4 (Quad-Core)
Threads44
Base clock speed2 GHz2 GHz
Boost clock speed2.9 GHz2.9 GHz
L2 cache1.5 MB1.5 MB
L3 cache4 MB4 MB
Chip lithography10 nm10 nm
Maximum core temperature105 °C105 °C
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility+-

Compatibility

Information on Celeron N5105 and Celeron N5095 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketFCBGA1338FCBGA1338
Power consumption (TDP)10 Watt15 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Celeron N5105 and Celeron N5095. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.2Intel® SSE4.2
AES-NI++
vProno data-
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Speed Shift++
Turbo Boost Technology--
Hyper-Threading Technology--
Idle States++
Thermal Monitoring++
Smart Response--
GPIO++
Turbo Boost Max 3.0--

Security technologies

Celeron N5105 and Celeron N5095 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT--
Identity Protection++
SGX--
OS Guard++

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Celeron N5105 and Celeron N5095 are enumerated here.

VT-d++
VT-x++
EPT++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Celeron N5105 and Celeron N5095. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4DDR4
Maximum memory size16 GB16 GB
Max memory channels22

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardIntel UHD GraphicsIntel UHD Graphics
Quick Sync Video++
Graphics max frequency800 MHz750 MHz
Execution Units2416

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Celeron N5105 and Celeron N5095 integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supported33
eDP++
DisplayPort++
HDMI++
MIPI-DSI++

Graphics image quality

Maximum display resolutions supported by Celeron N5105 and Celeron N5095 integrated GPUs, including resolutions over different interfaces.

4K resolution support++
Max resolution over HDMI 1.44096x2160@60Hz4096x2160@60Hz
Max resolution over eDP4096x2160@60Hz4096x2160@60Hz
Max resolution over DisplayPort4096x2160@60Hz4096x2160@60Hz

Graphics API support

APIs supported by Celeron N5105 and Celeron N5095 integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectX1212
OpenGL4.54.5

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Celeron N5105 and Celeron N5095.

PCI Express lanes88
USB revision2.0/3.22.0/3.2
Max number of SATA 6 Gb/s Ports22
Number of USB ports1414
Integrated LAN--
UART++

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Celeron N5105 2.60
Celeron N5095 2.62
+0.8%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Celeron N5105 4054
Celeron N5095 4080
+0.6%

Cinebench 15 64-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 15 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R15 which uses all the processor threads.

Celeron N5105 368
+1.1%
Celeron N5095 364

Cinebench 15 64-bit single-core

Cinebench R15 (standing for Release 15) is a benchmark made by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. It was superseded by later versions of Cinebench, which use more modern variants of Cinema 4D engine. The Single Core version (sometimes called Single-Thread) only uses a single processor thread to render a room full of reflective spheres and light sources.

Celeron N5105 108
+2%
Celeron N5095 106

Geekbench 5.5 Multi-Core

Celeron N5105 2080
+2.6%
Celeron N5095 2028

Blender(-)

Celeron N5105 1573
+1.7%
Celeron N5095 1547

Geekbench 5.5 Single-Core

Celeron N5105 653
+0.4%
Celeron N5095 651

7-Zip Single

Celeron N5105 3108
+0.3%
Celeron N5095 3100

7-Zip

Celeron N5105 11153
+1.3%
Celeron N5095 11013

WebXPRT 3

Celeron N5105 134
+7.1%
Celeron N5095 125

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 2.60 2.62
Power consumption (TDP) 10 Watt 15 Watt

Celeron N5105 has 50% lower power consumption.

Celeron N5095, on the other hand, has a 0.8% higher aggregate performance score.

Given the minimal performance differences, no clear winner can be declared between Celeron N5105 and Celeron N5095.


Should you still have questions on choice between Celeron N5105 and Celeron N5095, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Celeron N5105
Celeron N5105
Intel Celeron N5095
Celeron N5095

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.7 694 votes

Rate Celeron N5105 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.5 1439 votes

Rate Celeron N5095 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Celeron N5105 or Celeron N5095, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.