Ryzen 3 PRO 7330U vs Ryzen 5 4600G

Aggregate performance score

Ryzen 5 4600G
2020
6 cores / 12 threads, 65 Watt
10.12
+31.4%
Ryzen 3 PRO 7330U
2023
4 cores / 8 threads, 15 Watt
7.70

Ryzen 5 4600G outperforms Ryzen 3 PRO 7330U by a substantial 31% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Ryzen 5 4600G and Ryzen 3 PRO 7330U processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking764952
Place by popularity26not in top-100
Market segmentDesktop processorLaptop
SeriesAMD Ryzen 5no data
Power efficiency14.7348.58
Architecture codenameRenoir (2020−2023)Barcelo-R (2023)
Release date21 July 2020 (4 years ago)4 January 2023 (1 year ago)

Detailed specifications

Ryzen 5 4600G and Ryzen 3 PRO 7330U basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores6 (Hexa-Core)4 (Quad-Core)
Threads128
Base clock speed3.7 GHz2.3 GHz
Boost clock speed4.2 GHz4.3 GHz
Multiplier37no data
L1 cache384 KB64K (per core)
L2 cache3 MB512K (per core)
L3 cache8 MB (shared)8 MB (shared)
Chip lithography7 nm7 nm
Die size156 mm2180 mm2
Maximum case temperature (TCase)95 °Cno data
Number of transistors9800 Million10,700 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility++
Unlocked multiplier+-

Compatibility

Information on Ryzen 5 4600G and Ryzen 3 PRO 7330U compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketAM4FP6
Power consumption (TDP)65 Watt15 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Ryzen 5 4600G and Ryzen 3 PRO 7330U. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI++
AVX++
Precision Boost 2no data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Ryzen 5 4600G and Ryzen 3 PRO 7330U are enumerated here.

AMD-V++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Ryzen 5 4600G and Ryzen 3 PRO 7330U. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4-3200DDR4-3200
Maximum memory size128 GBno data
Maximum memory bandwidth51.196 GB/sno data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics card
Compare
AMD Radeon Vega 7AMD Radeon Graphics

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Ryzen 5 4600G and Ryzen 3 PRO 7330U.

PCIe version3.03.0
PCI Express lanesno data16

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Ryzen 5 4600G 10.12
+31.4%
Ryzen 3 PRO 7330U 7.70

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Ryzen 5 4600G 16072
+31.4%
Ryzen 3 PRO 7330U 12233

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

Ryzen 5 4600G 1582
+0.1%
Ryzen 3 PRO 7330U 1581

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

Ryzen 5 4600G 6135
+44.1%
Ryzen 3 PRO 7330U 4257

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 10.12 7.70
Integrated graphics card 7.46 1.98
Recency 21 July 2020 4 January 2023
Physical cores 6 4
Threads 12 8
Power consumption (TDP) 65 Watt 15 Watt

Ryzen 5 4600G has a 31.4% higher aggregate performance score, 276.8% faster integrated GPU, and 50% more physical cores and 50% more threads.

Ryzen 3 PRO 7330U, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 2 years, and 333.3% lower power consumption.

The Ryzen 5 4600G is our recommended choice as it beats the Ryzen 3 PRO 7330U in performance tests.

Note that Ryzen 5 4600G is a desktop processor while Ryzen 3 PRO 7330U is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Ryzen 5 4600G and Ryzen 3 PRO 7330U, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD Ryzen 5 4600G
Ryzen 5 4600G
AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 7330U
Ryzen 3 PRO 7330U

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.2 2693 votes

Rate Ryzen 5 4600G on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
5 1 vote

Rate Ryzen 3 PRO 7330U on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Ryzen 5 4600G or Ryzen 3 PRO 7330U, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.