Ryzen 7 PRO 2700U vs Ryzen 5 3500

Aggregate performance score

Ryzen 5 3500
6 cores / 6 threads, 65 Watt
8.20
+79.4%
Ryzen 7 PRO 2700U
2018
4 cores / 8 threads, 15 Watt
4.57

Ryzen 5 3500 outperforms Ryzen 7 PRO 2700U by an impressive 79% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Ryzen 5 3500 and Ryzen 7 PRO 2700U processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking9281314
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentDesktop processorLaptop
SeriesAMD Ryzen 5AMD Ryzen 7
Power efficiency11.7228.30
Architecture codenameZen 2 (2017−2020)Raven Ridge (2017−2018)
Release dateno data (2024 years ago)8 January 2018 (6 years ago)

Detailed specifications

Ryzen 5 3500 and Ryzen 7 PRO 2700U basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores6 (Hexa-Core)4 (Quad-Core)
Threads68
Base clock speed3.6 GHz2.2 GHz
Boost clock speed4.1 GHz2.2 GHz
Multiplierno data22
L1 cache384 KB384 KB
L2 cache3 MB2 MB
L3 cache16 MB4 MB (shared)
Chip lithography7 nm, 12 nm14 nm
Die sizeno data209.78 mm2
Number of transistorsno data4950 Million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--
Unlocked multiplier+-

Compatibility

Information on Ryzen 5 3500 and Ryzen 7 PRO 2700U compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1 (Uniprocessor)1 (Uniprocessor)
SocketSocket AM4FP5
Power consumption (TDP)65 Watt15 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Ryzen 5 3500 and Ryzen 7 PRO 2700U. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsno dataXFR, FMA3, SSE 4.2, AVX2, SMT
AES-NI++
AVX++
Precision Boost 2+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Ryzen 5 3500 and Ryzen 7 PRO 2700U are enumerated here.

AMD-V++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Ryzen 5 3500 and Ryzen 7 PRO 2700U. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4-3200DDR4 Dual-channel
Maximum memory size128 GB32 GB
Max memory channels22
Maximum memory bandwidth51.196 GB/s38.397 GB/s
ECC memory support-+

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics card-AMD Radeon RX Vega 10

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Ryzen 5 3500 and Ryzen 7 PRO 2700U.

PCIe versionno data3.0
PCI Express lanesno data12

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Ryzen 5 3500 8.20
+79.4%
Ryzen 7 PRO 2700U 4.57

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Ryzen 5 3500 12788
+79.6%
Ryzen 7 PRO 2700U 7121

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

Ryzen 5 3500 1514
+82.4%
Ryzen 7 PRO 2700U 830

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

Ryzen 5 3500 5375
+119%
Ryzen 7 PRO 2700U 2453

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 8.20 4.57
Physical cores 6 4
Threads 6 8
Chip lithography 7 nm 14 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 65 Watt 15 Watt

Ryzen 5 3500 has a 79.4% higher aggregate performance score, 50% more physical cores, and a 100% more advanced lithography process.

Ryzen 7 PRO 2700U, on the other hand, has 33.3% more threads, and 333.3% lower power consumption.

The Ryzen 5 3500 is our recommended choice as it beats the Ryzen 7 PRO 2700U in performance tests.

Note that Ryzen 5 3500 is a desktop processor while Ryzen 7 PRO 2700U is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Ryzen 5 3500 and Ryzen 7 PRO 2700U, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD Ryzen 5 3500
Ryzen 5 3500
AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 2700U
Ryzen 7 PRO 2700U

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.1 757 votes

Rate Ryzen 5 3500 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.9 43 votes

Rate Ryzen 7 PRO 2700U on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Ryzen 5 3500 or Ryzen 7 PRO 2700U, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.