Processor N95 vs 3015e

VS

Aggregate performance score

3015e
2020
2 cores / 4 threads, 6 Watt
1.69
Processor N95
2023
4 cores / 4 threads, 15 Watt
3.18
+88.2%

Processor N95 outperforms 3015e by an impressive 88% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing 3015e and Processor N95 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking20651616
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
SeriesAMD Raven Ridge (Ryzen 2000 APU)Intel Alder Lake-N
Power efficiency26.6420.05
Architecture codenamePollock (Zen) (2020)Alder Lake-N (2023)
Release date4 August 2020 (4 years ago)3 January 2023 (1 year ago)

Detailed specifications

3015e and Processor N95 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)4 (Quad-Core)
Threads44
Base clock speed1.2 GHz0.1 GHz
Boost clock speed2.3 GHz3.4 GHz
L1 cache192 KB96 KB (per core)
L2 cache1 MB2 MB (shared)
L3 cache4 MB6 MB (shared)
Chip lithography14 nm10 nm
Maximum core temperature105 °C105 °C
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-+

Compatibility

Information on 3015e and Processor N95 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configurationno data1
SocketFT5Intel BGA 1264
Power consumption (TDP)6 Watt15 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by 3015e and Processor N95. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsMMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4A, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX, AVX2, BMI2, ABM, FMA, ADX, SMEP, SMAP, SMT, CPB, AES-NI, RDRAND, RDSEED, SHA, SMEno data
AES-NI++
FMA++
AVX++
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)no data+

Security technologies

3015e and Processor N95 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXTno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by 3015e and Processor N95 are enumerated here.

VT-dno data+
VT-xno data+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by 3015e and Processor N95. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4DDR4, DDR5

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics card
Compare
AMD Radeon RX Vega 3 ( - 600 MHz)Intel UHD Graphics Xe 16EUs (Tiger Lake-H) ( - 1200 MHz)

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by 3015e and Processor N95.

PCIe versionno data3.0
PCI Express lanesno data9

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

3015e 1.69
Processor N95 3.18
+88.2%

Geekbench 5.5 Multi-Core

3015e 860
Processor N95 2566
+198%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 1.69 3.18
Integrated graphics card 2.98 2.30
Recency 4 August 2020 3 January 2023
Physical cores 2 4
Chip lithography 14 nm 10 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 6 Watt 15 Watt

3015e has 29.6% faster integrated GPU, and 150% lower power consumption.

Processor N95, on the other hand, has a 88.2% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 2 years, 100% more physical cores, and a 40% more advanced lithography process.

The Processor N95 is our recommended choice as it beats the 3015e in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between 3015e and Processor N95, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD 3015e
3015e
Intel Processor N95
Processor N95

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


2.6 30 votes

Rate 3015e on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.5 717 votes

Rate Processor N95 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about 3015e or Processor N95, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.