i5-12400F vs Ryzen 5 3580U

Aggregate performance score

Ryzen 5 3580U
2019
4 cores / 8 threads, 15 Watt
4.57
Core i5-12400F
2022
6 cores / 12 threads, 65 Watt
12.34
+170%

Core i5-12400F outperforms Ryzen 5 3580U by a whopping 170% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Ryzen 5 3580U and Core i5-12400F processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking1297619
Place by popularitynot in top-1004
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data43.60
Market segmentLaptopDesktop processor
SeriesAMD Ryzen 5no data
Power efficiency28.7117.89
Architecture codenamePicasso-U (Zen+) (2019−2020)Alder Lake-S (2022)
Release date6 January 2019 (5 years ago)4 January 2022 (2 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$180

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Ryzen 5 3580U and Core i5-12400F basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)6 (Hexa-Core)
Threads812
Base clock speed2.1 GHz2.5 GHz
Boost clock speed3.7 GHz4.4 GHz
Multiplier21no data
L1 cache384 KB80K (per core)
L2 cache2 MB1.25 MB (per core)
L3 cache4 MB (shared)18 MB (shared)
Chip lithography12 nmIntel 7 nm
Die size209.78 mm2163 mm2
Maximum core temperature105 °C100 °C
Number of transistors4940 Millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-+

Compatibility

Information on Ryzen 5 3580U and Core i5-12400F compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketFP5FCLGA1700
Power consumption (TDP)15 Watt65 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Ryzen 5 3580U and Core i5-12400F. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsMMX (+), SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, SSE4A, AES, AVX, AVX2, FMA3, SHAIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2
AES-NI++
AVX++
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)no data+
Speed Shiftno data+
Turbo Boost Technologyno data2.0
Hyper-Threading Technologyno data+
TSX-+
Idle Statesno data+
Thermal Monitoring-+
Turbo Boost Max 3.0no data-
Deep Learning Boost-+

Security technologies

Ryzen 5 3580U and Core i5-12400F technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXTno data+
EDBno data+
Secure Keyno data+
OS Guardno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Ryzen 5 3580U and Core i5-12400F are enumerated here.

AMD-V++
VT-dno data+
VT-xno data+
EPTno data+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Ryzen 5 3580U and Core i5-12400F. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4DDR5-4800, DDR4-3200
Maximum memory size32 GB128 GB
Max memory channels22
Maximum memory bandwidth38.397 GB/s76.8 GB/s

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardAMD Radeon RX Vega 9no data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Ryzen 5 3580U and Core i5-12400F.

PCIe version3.05.0 and 4.0
PCI Express lanes1220

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Ryzen 5 3580U 4.57
i5-12400F 12.34
+170%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Ryzen 5 3580U 7236
i5-12400F 19526
+170%

Cinebench 10 32-bit single-core

Cinebench R10 is an ancient ray tracing benchmark for processors by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. Its single core version uses just one CPU thread to render a futuristic looking motorcycle.

Ryzen 5 3580U 4525
i5-12400F 8389
+85.4%

Cinebench 10 32-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 10 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R10 using all the processor threads. Possible number of threads is limited by 16 in this version.

Ryzen 5 3580U 18307
i5-12400F 40690
+122%

3DMark06 CPU

3DMark06 is a discontinued DirectX 9 benchmark suite from Futuremark. Its CPU part contains two scenarios, one dedicated to artificial intelligence pathfinding, another to game physics using PhysX package.

Ryzen 5 3580U 5545
i5-12400F 11892
+114%

wPrime 32

wPrime 32M is a math multi-thread processor test, which calculates square roots of first 32 million integer numbers. Its result is measured in seconds, so that the less is benchmark result, the faster the processor.

Ryzen 5 3580U 7.17
i5-12400F 4.08
+75.7%

Cinebench 11.5 64-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 11.5 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R11.5 which uses all the processor threads. A maximum of 64 threads is supported in this version.

Ryzen 5 3580U 8
i5-12400F 20
+161%

Cinebench 15 64-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 15 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R15 which uses all the processor threads.

Ryzen 5 3580U 693
i5-12400F 1759
+154%

Cinebench 15 64-bit single-core

Cinebench R15 (standing for Release 15) is a benchmark made by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. It was superseded by later versions of Cinebench, which use more modern variants of Cinema 4D engine. The Single Core version (sometimes called Single-Thread) only uses a single processor thread to render a room full of reflective spheres and light sources.

Ryzen 5 3580U 139
i5-12400F 244
+75.5%

Cinebench 11.5 64-bit single-core

Cinebench R11.5 is an old benchmark by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. It was superseded by later versions of Cinebench, which use more modern variants of Cinema 4D engine. The Single Core version loads a single thread with ray tracing to render a glossy room full of crystal spheres and light sources.

Ryzen 5 3580U 1.65
i5-12400F 2.95
+78.8%

TrueCrypt AES

TrueCrypt is a discontinued piece of software that was widely used for on-the-fly-encryption of disk partitions, now superseded by VeraCrypt. It contains several embedded performance tests, one of them being TrueCrypt AES, which measures data encryption speed using AES algorithm. Result is encryption speed in gigabytes per second.

Ryzen 5 3580U 3.5
i5-12400F 9.3
+166%

x264 encoding pass 2

x264 Pass 2 is a slower variant of x264 video compression that produces a variable bit rate output file, which results in better quality since the higher bit rate is used when it is needed more. Benchmark result is still measured in frames per second.  

Ryzen 5 3580U 40
i5-12400F 101
+153%

x264 encoding pass 1

x264 version 4.0 is a video encoding benchmark uses MPEG 4 x264 compression method to compress a sample HD (720p) video. Pass 1 is a faster variant that produces a constant bit rate output file. Its result is measured in frames per second, which means how many frames of the source video file were encoded per second.  

Ryzen 5 3580U 135
i5-12400F 253
+86.6%

WinRAR 4.0

WinRAR 4.0 is an outdated version of a popular file archiver. It contains an internal speed test, using 'Best' setting of RAR compression on large chunks of randomly generated data. Its results are measured in kilobytes per second.

Ryzen 5 3580U 2924
i5-12400F 7816
+167%

Geekbench 5.5 Multi-Core

Ryzen 5 3580U 2990
i5-12400F 9517
+218%

Blender(-)

Ryzen 5 3580U 710
+164%
i5-12400F 269

Geekbench 5.5 Single-Core

Ryzen 5 3580U 900
i5-12400F 1742
+93.6%

7-Zip Single

Ryzen 5 3580U 3572
i5-12400F 5476
+53.3%

7-Zip

Ryzen 5 3580U 15209
i5-12400F 45043
+196%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 4.57 12.34
Recency 6 January 2019 4 January 2022
Physical cores 4 6
Threads 8 12
Power consumption (TDP) 15 Watt 65 Watt

Ryzen 5 3580U has 333.3% lower power consumption.

i5-12400F, on the other hand, has a 170% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 2 years, and 50% more physical cores and 50% more threads.

The Core i5-12400F is our recommended choice as it beats the Ryzen 5 3580U in performance tests.

Be aware that Ryzen 5 3580U is a notebook processor while Core i5-12400F is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Ryzen 5 3580U and Core i5-12400F, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD Ryzen 5 3580U
Ryzen 5 3580U
Intel Core i5-12400F
Core i5-12400F

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.8 34 votes

Rate Ryzen 5 3580U on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.1 13422 votes

Rate Core i5-12400F on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Ryzen 5 3580U or Core i5-12400F, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.