i7-3517UE vs Pro A8-8600B

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Pro A8-8600B
2015
4 cores / 4 threads, 12 Watt
1.42
Core i7-3517UE
2012
2 cores / 4 threads, 17 Watt
1.55
+9.2%

i7-3517UE outperforms Pro A8-8600B by a small 9% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Pro A8-8600B and Core i7-3517UE processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance ranking21882108
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
SeriesAMD Carrizono data
Architecture codenameCarrizo (2015−2018)Ivy Bridge (2012−2013)
Release date3 June 2015 (9 years ago)3 June 2012 (12 years ago)

Detailed specifications

Pro A8-8600B and Core i7-3517UE basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads44
Base clock speed1.6 GHz1.7 GHz
Boost clock speed3 GHz2.8 GHz
L1 cacheno data64 KB (per core)
L2 cache2048 KB256 KB (per core)
L3 cacheno data4 MB (shared)
Chip lithography28 nm22 nm
Die sizeno data118 mm2
Number of transistors3100 Millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--

Compatibility

Information on Pro A8-8600B and Core i7-3517UE compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configurationno data1
SocketFP4Intel BGA1023
Power consumption (TDP)12-35 Watt17 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Pro A8-8600B and Core i7-3517UE. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsHSA 1.0no data
AES-NI++
FMAFMA4-
AVXAVX+
FRTC+-
FreeSync+-
TrueAudio+-
PowerNow+-
PowerGating+-
Out-of-band client management+-
VirusProtect+-
RAID+-
HSA+-
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)no data+
Hyper-Threading Technologyno data+

Security technologies

Pro A8-8600B and Core i7-3517UE technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXTno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Pro A8-8600B and Core i7-3517UE are enumerated here.

AMD-V+-
VT-dno data+
VT-xno data+
IOMMU 2.0+-

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Pro A8-8600B and Core i7-3517UE. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3/DDR3L-2133unknown Dual-channel
Max memory channels2no data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardAMD Radeon R6 GraphicsIntel HD 4000
iGPU core count6no data
Number of pipelines384no data
Enduro+-
Switchable graphics+-
UVD+-
VCE+-

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Pro A8-8600B and Core i7-3517UE integrated GPUs.

DisplayPort+-
HDMI+-

Graphics API support

APIs supported by Pro A8-8600B and Core i7-3517UE integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectXDirectX® 12no data
Vulkan+-

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Pro A8-8600B and Core i7-3517UE.

PCIe version3.0no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Pro A8-8600B 1.42
i7-3517UE 1.55
+9.2%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Pro A8-8600B 2190
i7-3517UE 2384
+8.9%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 1.42 1.55
Recency 3 June 2015 3 June 2012
Physical cores 4 2
Chip lithography 28 nm 22 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 12 Watt 17 Watt

Pro A8-8600B has an age advantage of 3 years, 100% more physical cores, and 41.7% lower power consumption.

i7-3517UE, on the other hand, has a 9.2% higher aggregate performance score, and a 27.3% more advanced lithography process.

Given the minimal performance differences, no clear winner can be declared between Pro A8-8600B and Core i7-3517UE.


Should you still have questions on choice between Pro A8-8600B and Core i7-3517UE, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD Pro A8-8600B
Pro A8-8600B
Intel Core i7-3517UE
Core i7-3517UE

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.3 47 votes

Rate Pro A8-8600B on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.7 3 votes

Rate Core i7-3517UE on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Pro A8-8600B or Core i7-3517UE, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.