M-5Y71 vs A8-7200P
Aggregate performance score
A8-7200P outperforms M-5Y71 by a small 6% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Primary details
Comparing A8-7200P and Core M-5Y71 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
Place in performance ranking | 2197 | 2238 |
Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
Market segment | Laptop | Laptop |
Series | AMD Kaveri | Intel Core M |
Architecture codename | Kaveri (2014−2015) | Broadwell (2014−2019) |
Release date | 4 June 2014 (10 years ago) | 27 October 2014 (9 years ago) |
Launch price (MSRP) | no data | $281 |
Detailed specifications
A8-7200P and Core M-5Y71 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
Physical cores | 4 (Quad-Core) | 2 (Dual-core) |
Threads | 4 | 4 |
Base clock speed | 2.4 GHz | 1.2 GHz |
Boost clock speed | 3.3 GHz | 2.9 GHz |
L1 cache | no data | 64K (per core) |
L2 cache | 4096 KB | 256K (per core) |
L3 cache | no data | 4 MB (shared) |
Chip lithography | 28 nm | 14 nm |
Die size | 245 mm2 | 50 mm2 |
Maximum core temperature | 102 °C | 95 °C |
Number of transistors | 2410 Million | 1300 Million |
64 bit support | + | + |
Windows 11 compatibility | - | - |
Compatibility
Information on A8-7200P and Core M-5Y71 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
Number of CPUs in a configuration | no data | 1 |
Socket | FP3 | FCBGA1234 |
Power consumption (TDP) | 35 Watt | 4.5 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by A8-7200P and Core M-5Y71. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
Instruction set extensions | 86x SSE (1, 2, 3, 3S, 4.1, 4.2, 4A),-64, AES, AVX, FMA | Intel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2 |
AES-NI | + | + |
FMA | + | - |
AVX | + | + |
FRTC | + | - |
TrueAudio | + | - |
PowerNow | + | - |
PowerGating | + | - |
Out-of-band client management | + | - |
VirusProtect | + | - |
HSA | + | - |
vPro | no data | + |
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | no data | + |
Turbo Boost Technology | no data | 2.0 |
Hyper-Threading Technology | no data | + |
TSX | - | + |
Idle States | no data | + |
Thermal Monitoring | - | + |
Flex Memory Access | no data | + |
SIPP | - | + |
Smart Response | no data | + |
FDI | no data | + |
Fast Memory Access | no data | + |
Status | no data | Discontinued |
Security technologies
A8-7200P and Core M-5Y71 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
TXT | no data | + |
EDB | no data | + |
Secure Key | no data | + |
Identity Protection | - | + |
OS Guard | no data | + |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by A8-7200P and Core M-5Y71 are enumerated here.
AMD-V | + | + |
VT-d | no data | + |
VT-x | no data | + |
EPT | no data | + |
IOMMU 2.0 | + | - |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by A8-7200P and Core M-5Y71. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
Supported memory types | DDR3-1866 | DDR3 |
Maximum memory size | no data | 16 GB |
Max memory channels | 2 | 2 |
Maximum memory bandwidth | no data | 25.6 GB/s |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
Integrated graphics card Compare | AMD Radeon R5 Graphics | Intel HD Graphics 5300 |
iGPU core count | 4 | no data |
Max video memory | no data | 16 GB |
Quick Sync Video | - | + |
Clear Video HD | no data | + |
Enduro | + | - |
Switchable graphics | + | - |
UVD | + | - |
VCE | + | - |
Graphics max frequency | no data | 900 MHz |
InTru 3D | no data | + |
Graphics interfaces
Available interfaces and connections of A8-7200P and Core M-5Y71 integrated GPUs.
Number of displays supported | no data | 3 |
eDP | no data | + |
DisplayPort | + | + |
HDMI | + | + |
Graphics image quality
Maximum display resolutions supported by A8-7200P and Core M-5Y71 integrated GPUs, including resolutions over different interfaces.
Max resolution over HDMI 1.4 | no data | 2560x1600@60Hz |
Max resolution over DisplayPort | no data | 2560x1600@60Hz |
Graphics API support
APIs supported by A8-7200P and Core M-5Y71 integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.
DirectX | DirectX® 12 | 11.2/12 |
OpenGL | no data | 4.3 |
Vulkan | + | - |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by A8-7200P and Core M-5Y71.
PCIe version | 3.0 | 2.0 |
PCI Express lanes | no data | 12 |
Synthetic benchmark performance
Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.
Combined synthetic benchmark score
This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.
Passmark
Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.
Pros & cons summary
Performance score | 1.39 | 1.31 |
Recency | 4 June 2014 | 27 October 2014 |
Physical cores | 4 | 2 |
Chip lithography | 28 nm | 14 nm |
Power consumption (TDP) | 35 Watt | 4 Watt |
A8-7200P has a 6.1% higher aggregate performance score, and 100% more physical cores.
M-5Y71, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 4 months, a 100% more advanced lithography process, and 775% lower power consumption.
Given the minimal performance differences, no clear winner can be declared between A8-7200P and Core M-5Y71.
Should you still have questions on choice between A8-7200P and Core M-5Y71, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.