Celeron M 353 vs Pro A8-8600B

VS

Primary details

Comparing Pro A8-8600B and Celeron M 353 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking2219not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
SeriesAMD CarrizoCeleron M
Power efficiency3.73no data
Architecture codenameCarrizo (2015−2018)Dothan (2004−2005)
Release date3 June 2015 (9 years ago)no data (2024 years ago)

Detailed specifications

Pro A8-8600B and Celeron M 353 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)1 (Single-Core)
Threads41
Base clock speed1.6 GHzno data
Boost clock speed3 GHz0.9 GHz
Bus rateno data400 MHz
L2 cache2048 KBno data
Chip lithography28 nm90 nm
Number of transistors3100 Millionno data
64 bit support+-
Windows 11 compatibility--

Compatibility

Information on Pro A8-8600B and Celeron M 353 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

SocketFP4no data
Power consumption (TDP)12-35 Watt5 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Pro A8-8600B and Celeron M 353. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsHSA 1.0no data
AES-NI+-
FMAFMA4-
AVXAVX-
FRTC+-
FreeSync+-
TrueAudio+-
PowerNow+-
PowerGating+-
Out-of-band client management+-
VirusProtect+-
RAID+-
HSA+-

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Pro A8-8600B and Celeron M 353 are enumerated here.

AMD-V+-
IOMMU 2.0+-

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Pro A8-8600B and Celeron M 353. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3/DDR3L-2133no data
Max memory channels2no data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardAMD Radeon R6 Graphicsno data
iGPU core count6no data
Number of pipelines384no data
Enduro+-
Switchable graphics+-
UVD+-
VCE+-

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Pro A8-8600B and Celeron M 353 integrated GPUs.

DisplayPort+-
HDMI+-

Graphics API support

APIs supported by Pro A8-8600B and Celeron M 353 integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectXDirectX® 12no data
Vulkan+-

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Pro A8-8600B and Celeron M 353.

PCIe version3.0no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.



Cinebench 10 32-bit single-core

Cinebench R10 is an ancient ray tracing benchmark for processors by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. Its single core version uses just one CPU thread to render a futuristic looking motorcycle.

Pro A8-8600B 2111
+399%
Celeron M 353 423

Pros & cons summary


Physical cores 4 1
Threads 4 1
Chip lithography 28 nm 90 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 12 Watt 5 Watt

Pro A8-8600B has 300% more physical cores and 300% more threads, and a 221.4% more advanced lithography process.

Celeron M 353, on the other hand, has 140% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Pro A8-8600B and Celeron M 353. We've got no test results to judge.


Should you still have questions on choice between Pro A8-8600B and Celeron M 353, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD Pro A8-8600B
Pro A8-8600B
Intel Celeron M 353
Celeron M 353

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.3 48 votes

Rate Pro A8-8600B on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.2 22 votes

Rate Celeron M 353 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Pro A8-8600B or Celeron M 353, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.