Pentium M 765 vs Pro A8-8600B

VS

Aggregate performance score

Pro A8-8600B
2015
4 cores / 4 threads, 12 Watt
1.38
+527%
Pentium M 765
2004
1 core / 1 thread, 7 Watt
0.22

Pro A8-8600B outperforms Pentium M 765 by a whopping 527% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Pro A8-8600B and Pentium M 765 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking22353195
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
SeriesAMD CarrizoPentium M
Power efficiency3.730.99
Architecture codenameCarrizo (2015−2018)Dothan (2004−2005)
Release date3 June 2015 (9 years ago)20 October 2004 (20 years ago)

Detailed specifications

Pro A8-8600B and Pentium M 765 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)1 (Single-Core)
Threads41
Base clock speed1.6 GHz2.1 GHz
Boost clock speed3 GHz2.1 GHz
Bus rateno data400 MHz
L1 cacheno data32 KB
L2 cache2048 KB2 MB
L3 cacheno data0 KB
Chip lithography28 nm90 nm
Die sizeno data87 mm2
Maximum core temperatureno data100 °C
Number of transistors3100 Million144 million
64 bit support+-
Windows 11 compatibility--
VID voltage rangeno data0.988-1.356V

Compatibility

Information on Pro A8-8600B and Pentium M 765 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configurationno data1
SocketFP4PPGA478, H-PBGA479
Power consumption (TDP)12-35 Watt7.5 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Pro A8-8600B and Pentium M 765. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsHSA 1.0no data
AES-NI+-
FMAFMA4-
AVXAVX-
FRTC+-
FreeSync+-
TrueAudio+-
PowerNow+-
PowerGating+-
Out-of-band client management+-
VirusProtect+-
RAID+-
HSA+-
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)no data+
Turbo Boost Technologyno data-
Hyper-Threading Technologyno data-
Idle Statesno data-
Demand Based Switchingno data-
PAEno data32 Bit
FSB parityno data-

Security technologies

Pro A8-8600B and Pentium M 765 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXTno data-
EDBno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Pro A8-8600B and Pentium M 765 are enumerated here.

AMD-V+-
VT-xno data-
IOMMU 2.0+-

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Pro A8-8600B and Pentium M 765. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3/DDR3L-2133DDR2
Max memory channels2no data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardAMD Radeon R6 GraphicsOn certain motherboards (Chipset feature)
iGPU core count6no data
จำนวนพาธไลน์384no data
Enduro+-
Switchable graphics+-
UVD+-
VCE+-

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Pro A8-8600B and Pentium M 765 integrated GPUs.

DisplayPort+-
HDMI+-

Graphics API support

APIs supported by Pro A8-8600B and Pentium M 765 integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectXDirectX® 12no data
Vulkan+-

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Pro A8-8600B and Pentium M 765.

PCIe version3.0no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Pro A8-8600B 1.38
+527%
Pentium M 765 0.22

Cinebench 10 32-bit single-core

Cinebench R10 is an ancient ray tracing benchmark for processors by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. Its single core version uses just one CPU thread to render a futuristic looking motorcycle.

Pro A8-8600B 2111
+15.1%
Pentium M 765 1834

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 1.38 0.22
Recency 3 June 2015 20 October 2004
Physical cores 4 1
Threads 4 1
Chip lithography 28 nm 90 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 12 Watt 7 Watt

Pro A8-8600B has a 527.3% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 10 years, 300% more physical cores and 300% more threads, and a 221.4% more advanced lithography process.

Pentium M 765, on the other hand, has 71.4% lower power consumption.

The Pro A8-8600B is our recommended choice as it beats the Pentium M 765 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Pro A8-8600B and Pentium M 765, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD Pro A8-8600B
Pro A8-8600B
Intel Pentium M 765
Pentium M 765

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.3 48 votes

Rate Pro A8-8600B on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.1 7 votes

Rate Pentium M 765 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Pro A8-8600B or Pentium M 765, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.