Atom C3958 vs Phenom II X6 1090T BE
Primary details
Comparing Phenom II X6 1090T BE and Atom C3958 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in performance ranking | not rated | 1633 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Cost-effectiveness evaluation | no data | 0.54 |
| Market segment | Desktop processor | Server |
| Series | no data | Intel Atom |
| Architecture codename | Thuban (2010) | Goldmont (2016−2017) |
| Release date | 27 April 2010 (14 years ago) | 15 August 2017 (6 years ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | no data | $449 |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation
Performance per price, higher is better.
Detailed specifications
Phenom II X6 1090T BE and Atom C3958 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 6 (Hexa-Core) | 16 (Hexadeca-Core) |
| Threads | 6 | 16 |
| Base clock speed | 3.2 GHz | no data |
| Boost clock speed | 3.6 GHz | 2 GHz |
| L1 cache | 128 KB (per core) | 896 KB |
| L2 cache | 512 KB (per core) | 16 MB |
| L3 cache | 6 MB (shared) | no data |
| Chip lithography | 45 nm | 14 nm |
| Die size | 346 mm2 | no data |
| Maximum core temperature | no data | 83 °C |
| Number of transistors | 904 million | no data |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | - |
| Unlocked multiplier | Yes | No |
Compatibility
Information on Phenom II X6 1090T BE and Atom C3958 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | 1 (Uniprocessor) |
| Socket | AM3 | no data |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 125 Watt | 31 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Phenom II X6 1090T BE and Atom C3958. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| AES-NI | no data | + |
| Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | no data | + |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Phenom II X6 1090T BE and Atom C3958 are enumerated here.
| VT-d | no data | + |
| VT-x | no data | + |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Phenom II X6 1090T BE and Atom C3958. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR3 | DDR3L-1600 |
| Maximum memory size | no data | 256 GB |
| Max memory channels | no data | 2 |
| Maximum memory bandwidth | no data | 38.397 GB/s |
| ECC memory support | no data | + |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) | no data |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Phenom II X6 1090T BE and Atom C3958.
| PCIe version | 2.0 | no data |
| PCI Express lanes | no data | 16 |
Pros & cons summary
| Recency | 27 April 2010 | 15 August 2017 |
| Physical cores | 6 | 16 |
| Threads | 6 | 16 |
| Chip lithography | 45 nm | 14 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 125 Watt | 31 Watt |
Atom C3958 has an age advantage of 7 years, 166.7% more physical cores and 166.7% more threads, a 221.4% more advanced lithography process, and 303.2% lower power consumption.
We couldn't decide between Phenom II X6 1090T BE and Atom C3958. We've got no test results to judge.
Note that Phenom II X6 1090T BE is a desktop processor while Atom C3958 is a server/workstation one.
Should you still have questions on choice between Phenom II X6 1090T BE and Atom C3958, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.
