Xeon E5-1428L vs Celeron 3765U

VS

Aggregate performance score

Celeron 3765U
2015
2 cores / 2 threads, 15 Watt
0.80
Xeon E5-1428L
2012
6 cores / 12 threads, 60 Watt
4.01
+401%

Xeon E5-1428L outperforms Celeron 3765U by a whopping 401% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Celeron 3765U and Xeon E5-1428L processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking26131430
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopServer
SeriesIntel Celeronno data
Power efficiency4.956.21
Architecture codenameBroadwell (2015−2019)Sandy Bridge-EN (2012)
Release date1 June 2015 (9 years ago)14 May 2012 (12 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$107no data

Detailed specifications

Celeron 3765U and Xeon E5-1428L basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)6 (Hexa-Core)
Threads212
Base clock speed1.9 GHz1.8 GHz
Boost clock speed1.9 GHz1.8 GHz
Bus rate5 GT/s0 GT/s
L1 cache128 KB64 KB (per core)
L2 cache512 KB256 KB (per core)
L3 cache2 MB15360 KB (shared)
Chip lithography14 nm32 nm
Die size82 mm2294 mm2
Maximum core temperature105 °Cno data
Number of transistors1300 Million1,270 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--

Compatibility

Information on Celeron 3765U and Xeon E5-1428L compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketFCBGA1168FCLGA1356
Power consumption (TDP)15 Watt60 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Celeron 3765U and Xeon E5-1428L. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2Intel® AVX
AES-NI++
AVX++
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Turbo Boost Technology--
Hyper-Threading Technology-+
Idle Statesno data+
Thermal Monitoring++
Flex Memory Access+-
Smart Response-no data
Demand Based Switchingno data+
FDI+no data
Fast Memory Access+no data

Security technologies

Celeron 3765U and Xeon E5-1428L technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT-+
EDB++
Secure Key+no data
Identity Protection+-
OS Guard-no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Celeron 3765U and Xeon E5-1428L are enumerated here.

AMD-V+-
VT-d++
VT-x++
EPT++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Celeron 3765U and Xeon E5-1428L. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR3
Maximum memory size16 GBno data
Max memory channels23
Maximum memory bandwidth25.6 GB/s32 GB/s
ECC memory support-+

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardIntel® HD Graphics for 5th Generation Intel® Processorsno data
Quick Sync Video+-
Clear Video+no data
Graphics max frequency850 MHzno data
InTru 3D+no data

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Celeron 3765U and Xeon E5-1428L integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supported3no data
eDP+no data
DisplayPort+-
HDMI+-

Graphics API support

APIs supported by Celeron 3765U and Xeon E5-1428L integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectX11.2/12no data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Celeron 3765U and Xeon E5-1428L.

PCIe version2.03.0
PCI Express lanes1224

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Celeron 3765U 0.80
Xeon E5-1428L 4.01
+401%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Celeron 3765U 1252
Xeon E5-1428L 6255
+400%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.80 4.01
Recency 1 June 2015 14 May 2012
Physical cores 2 6
Threads 2 12
Chip lithography 14 nm 32 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 15 Watt 60 Watt

Celeron 3765U has an age advantage of 3 years, a 128.6% more advanced lithography process, and 300% lower power consumption.

Xeon E5-1428L, on the other hand, has a 401.3% higher aggregate performance score, and 200% more physical cores and 500% more threads.

The Xeon E5-1428L is our recommended choice as it beats the Celeron 3765U in performance tests.

Be aware that Celeron 3765U is a notebook processor while Xeon E5-1428L is a server/workstation one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Celeron 3765U and Xeon E5-1428L, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Celeron 3765U
Celeron 3765U
Intel Xeon E5-1428L
Xeon E5-1428L

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


No user ratings yet.

Rate Celeron 3765U on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate Xeon E5-1428L on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Celeron 3765U or Xeon E5-1428L, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.