Apple M1 vs Phenom II X3 715 BE
Primary details
Comparing Phenom II X3 715 BE and Apple M1 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | not rated | 1194 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Market segment | Desktop processor | Laptop |
| Series | no data | Apple Apple M-Series |
| Architecture codename | Heka (2009−2010) | no data |
| Release date | 1 October 2010 (14 years ago) | 10 November 2020 (4 years ago) |
Detailed specifications
Phenom II X3 715 BE and Apple M1 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 3 (Tri-Core) | 8 (Octa-Core) |
| Threads | 3 | 8 |
| Base clock speed | 2.8 GHz | 2.064 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 2.8 GHz | 3.2 GHz |
| L1 cache | 128 KB (per core) | 2 MB |
| L2 cache | 512 KB (per core) | 16 MB |
| L3 cache | 6 MB (shared) | 16 MB |
| Chip lithography | 45 nm | 5 nm |
| Die size | 258 mm2 | no data |
| Number of transistors | 758 million | 16000 Million |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | - |
| Unlocked multiplier | + | - |
Compatibility
Information on Phenom II X3 715 BE and Apple M1 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | no data |
| Socket | AM2+ | no data |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 95 Watt | no data |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Phenom II X3 715 BE and Apple M1. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | unknown Dual-channel | no data |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | no data | Apple M1 8-Core GPU |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Phenom II X3 715 BE and Apple M1.
| PCIe version | 2.0 | no data |
Pros & cons summary
| Recency | 1 October 2010 | 10 November 2020 |
| Physical cores | 3 | 8 |
| Threads | 3 | 8 |
| Chip lithography | 45 nm | 5 nm |
Apple M1 has an age advantage of 10 years, 166.7% more physical cores and 166.7% more threads, and a 800% more advanced lithography process.
We couldn't decide between Phenom II X3 715 BE and Apple M1. We've got no test results to judge.
Note that Phenom II X3 715 BE is a desktop processor while Apple M1 is a notebook one.
Should you still have questions on choice between Phenom II X3 715 BE and Apple M1, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.
