Ryzen 3 3250U vs Pentium M 738

VS

Aggregate performance score

Pentium M 738
1 core / 1 thread, 10 Watt
0.13
Ryzen 3 3250U
2020
2 cores / 4 threads, 15 Watt
2.40
+1746%

Ryzen 3 3250U outperforms Pentium M 738 by a whopping 1746% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Pentium M 738 and Ryzen 3 3250U processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking33401783
Place by popularitynot in top-10080
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
SeriesPentium MAMD Ryzen 3
Power efficiency1.2315.14
Architecture codenameDothan (2004−2005)Picasso (2019−2022)
Release dateno data6 January 2020 (4 years ago)

Detailed specifications

Pentium M 738 and Ryzen 3 3250U basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores1 (Single-Core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads14
Base clock speedno data2.6 GHz
Boost clock speed1.4 GHz3.5 GHz
Bus rate400 MHzno data
Multiplierno data26
L1 cacheno data192 KB
L2 cacheno data1 MB
L3 cacheno data4 MB (shared)
Chip lithography90 nm14 nm
Die sizeno data246 mm2
Maximum core temperatureno data95 °C
Number of transistorsno data4500 Million
64 bit support-+
Windows 11 compatibility-+

Compatibility

Information on Pentium M 738 and Ryzen 3 3250U compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configurationno data1
Socketno dataFP5
Power consumption (TDP)10 Watt15 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Pentium M 738 and Ryzen 3 3250U. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsno dataMMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4A, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX, AVX2, BMI2, ABM, FMA, ADX, SMEP, SMAP, SMT, CPB, AES-NI, RDRAND, RDSEED, SHA, SME
AES-NI-+
FMA-+
AVX-+
Precision Boost 2no data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Pentium M 738 and Ryzen 3 3250U are enumerated here.

AMD-V-+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Pentium M 738 and Ryzen 3 3250U. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesno dataDDR4
Maximum memory sizeno data32 GB
Max memory channelsno data2
Maximum memory bandwidthno data38.397 GB/s

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataAMD Radeon RX Vega 3 ( - 1200 MHz)

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Pentium M 738 and Ryzen 3 3250U.

PCIe versionno data3.0
PCI Express lanesno data12

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Pentium M 738 0.13
Ryzen 3 3250U 2.40
+1746%

wPrime 32

wPrime 32M is a math multi-thread processor test, which calculates square roots of first 32 million integer numbers. Its result is measured in seconds, so that the less is benchmark result, the faster the processor.

Pentium M 738 128
Ryzen 3 3250U 14.5
+783%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.13 2.40
Physical cores 1 2
Threads 1 4
Chip lithography 90 nm 14 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 10 Watt 15 Watt

Pentium M 738 has 50% lower power consumption.

Ryzen 3 3250U, on the other hand, has a 1746.2% higher aggregate performance score, 100% more physical cores and 300% more threads, and a 542.9% more advanced lithography process.

The Ryzen 3 3250U is our recommended choice as it beats the Pentium M 738 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Pentium M 738 and Ryzen 3 3250U, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Pentium M 738
Pentium M 738
AMD Ryzen 3 3250U
Ryzen 3 3250U

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


1 3 votes

Rate Pentium M 738 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.9 2148 votes

Rate Ryzen 3 3250U on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Pentium M 738 or Ryzen 3 3250U, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.